I feel something needs to be clarified, that my good friend Max Stirner pointed out.
"The community" does not actually exist. It's an abstraction. Each individual gay man, lesbian woman, tranny or any other type of sexual/gendered misfit is not really 'bond together'.
The concept of a community is only created and used because it is expedient or practical for those involved at any given time.
As a result arguments about who is "really" or "truely" part of the community. Whether a certain group should "leave the community. Or appeals that someone is indepted to others due to this community. All of them are factitious and empty.
>>8701314
>>8701347
That's not what I'm saying at all. Did you even read it?
Stirner believed the only legitimate form of hum,an cooperation was the union of egoists, in which everyone continually positively confirms they want to be involved, and can leave or dissolve it at anytime. The best example of a union of egoists is children coming together to play a game.
He believed all other forms of relationship were oppressive. So yes, the LGBT "comminity" is oppressive from his perspective. Only a union of egoists composed of LGBT people would legitimate.
>>8701314
Except that most trannies, bisexuals, and "asexuals" are repressed gay men.
>>8701314
>>8703097
>>8701314
Stirner helped me realise it's within my self-interest to transition, and to shed the spooks preventing me from doing it.
Thanks ole' big forehead, you've saved my life.
>>8703371
Is Stirner the ultimate philosopher for transgirls?
>>8701347
wtf I love blanchard now