>conservative/right-wing/libertaria n >and trans/femboy/agp/ftm

>>8701016
Traps/femboys/agp/ftm are all different variants of being a total man.

people too young or privileged or blind to the fact the "free market" hates them and has hated them and still hates them

I am not more important than the proud, traditional institutions of my civilization, but I also don't see how they contradict me trying to live the best life I can within them. The only *real* barrier is this myth on all sides that being trans means you're left.

That's just what you turn into if you spend too much time on 4chan.

File: C9tjctIXUAMTFkG.jpg (22KB, 500x306px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x306px

>>8701016
>>8698289
>Implying I don't defend my own rights.

The capitalist fascist class is openly promoting transgenderism. Right wing trannies make perfect sense to me. Transgender activists are all basically MRAs anyway

File: polgbt_propaganda_invite.png (269KB, 353x400px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 353x400px

>>8701016
https://discord.gg/B4adyQr

/polgbt/ for real right-wing gays/bi/trannys. No kikes, chasers and pedos like (((other))) server.

>If you're not a straight, white, cis you are REQUIRED to be a leftist on pain of ridicule and erasure

Fuck OFF. I swear to god you people end up causing more problems than the 'alt right' and 'hate groups'.

>>8702498
It's the stuck-up authoritarian attitude, it endears counter-cultural behavior as a reaction.

Leftists are literally growing the alt-right when they act like this because they make third parties angry at the sheer smugness.

>>8701016
Have brain of my own.

>>8701016
If you're into ideologies which have always hated you for existing you're a sellout and a cuck.

It's time to admit you just have a "fuck me nazi dad" fetish instead of actually being gay or whatever

Just because modern Liberals and Democrats are shitty doesn't mean you have to have a knee-jerk response and slingshot the other way. Only retards think two political ideas exist.

superior ideology and I'm tired of the left using us as a bargaining chip

>liberalism is so radical and fucked up now that libertarians are considered conservative
What a time to be alive.

>>8702583
they wont tolerate anyone who has any ideas that fall right of center and so libertarians = conservative

File: Smug+anime+faces_95aba7_5762907.jpg (10KB, 237x212px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 237x212px

>>8701976
>transgender activists are all bascially MRAs anyway
>implying that's a bad thing
Up the MRM

>>8702583
>liberals
>radical
kek
>right libertarians being conservative is new
APEX KEK

the only thing that matters is the economy and standard of living. the show must go on at all costs. government controlled marriage is a spook. organized religion is a necessary evil for controlling the masses. your own desires matter little. provide value to society, even if that value is a latent capability should the apocalypse arrive. your people must be protected. life is always been and will always be us vs them. liberalism is too synonymous with globalism to have any merit nowadays.

>>8701976
>Transgender activists are all basically MRAs anyway
explain this?!

File: 00roem1.jpg (7KB, 160x256px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 160x256px

>>8701016
what do I have to explain? I'm not the first nor the last

If you look at it honestly being homosexual is nothing but a defect. The only reason to encourage it is because there is no reliable way to reverse it so people might as well indulge instead of killing themselves. But no gay will lead a life half as fulfilling as your average happy straight. The sex itself is even nasty to MANY homosexuals.


That this is a valid perfectly natural sexual orientation is just feel good nonsense we tell ourselves.

>>8701050
>Privileged.
A buzzword that describes some ones lack of ability to understand some one elses viewpoint and attempt to make their opinion invalid.
Privileged? Yeah Im white, but I'm also from a black Memphis neighborhood and experienced the fuck out of racism. Capitalism can get you out of poverty if you're smart.
Just most people that bash capitalism? They just want jobs with better wages, they never attempt to do their own business or barter for stuff. It's always! "Waaah! Late stage Capitalism! Why won't some one make my wages higher!?"

Which this system of corporatocracy does need to be changed, as it attempts to prevent the poor folk from doing business and you have to do it in an off the books manner until you can put it on the books.


I've lived a god damn rough life and the only ones that tell me I have privilege? Bitter poor SJWs, Middle Class SJWs that can't do any thing else but wage slave, people that extend their experience to every one else and believe their anecdote is the objective view of reality.


To those saying Libertarianism takes away rights? Rights are given by Nature and or God. They're natural, however to keep them, you must be willing to defend them yourself. They're not given by any human. They're some thing you take for yourself.

>>8702510
>Leftists are literally growing the alt-right when they act like this because they make third parties angry at the sheer smugness.
Do you also think Islamophobia is contributing to the growth of Islamic terrorism?

>>8702583
>>8702593
The literal, etymological meaning of libertarian is someone who believes in individual freedom. However, there's a major divide between right and left individualists, mainly over the issue of whether the institution of private property is a form of coercion. As a result, "anarchist" usually implies left individualists and "libertarian" (especially in the US) implies right individualists.

>>8703573
>thread about conservative/right-wing/libertarian LGBT people
>posts a socialist who was killed by right-wingers

>>8703630
>Capitalism can get you out of poverty if you're smart.
That is a classic example of survivorship bias, just so you know.

>They just want jobs with better wages, they never attempt to do their own business or barter for stuff.
They lack the practical ability to start their own businesses, because they lack the capital needed to do so. That's really the central aspect of socialism, it's not "higher wages" or "make everything free", it's that ownership of capital should not be concentrated in the hands of a wealthy elite.

>>8703630
>To those saying Libertarianism takes away rights? Rights are given by Nature and or God. They're natural, however to keep them, you must be willing to defend them yourself. They're not given by any human. They're some thing you take for yourself.
Couldn't that definition to be used to create an essentially arbitrary definition of rights? If something is a right because one can take it and defend it successfully, wouldn't that mean someone has a "right" to their neighbor's property if they have the ability to take it by force and prevent them from taking it back? What about the right to freedom from violence? It can only be defended by having the ability to use defensive violence on others, which means that one who is unable to defend themselves does not have a right to be free from violence. Hence why many people define rights in terms of what the law says one's rights are. And legal rights as we understand them in many cases do constitute positive rights (i.e the government is compelled to perform a certain action in certain circumstances) rather than negative rights (i.e. the government is compelled NOT to perform a certain action in certain circumstances).

The right to bear arms and the right to freedom of expression are legal rights that are predominantly negative rights, as in the right consists solely of a promise from the government to not prevent you from engaging in certain actions. For example, the right to bear arms would be violated if the government made it illegal for you to buy guns. If every gun shop owner in the world simply decided to refuse to sell you a gun, your right to bear arms wouldn't be violated. Same deal with free speech; it's violated if the government jails you for what you say, but not if no one wants to buy your books, for example.

>>8704736


However, the society that we live in, and which makes those rights possible, does depend on positive rights. Rights to freedom from violence and freedom from theft are essentially positive rights, as they are not just a promise from the state to not deprive you of your freedom, but a promise from the state to prevent other private individuals from depriving you of your freedom as well. Rights to freedom from violence and theft are NOT natural rights for everyone, because in the absence of a state, many would be unable to personally protect themselves and their property. So those rights, which are generally regarded as essential to a functioning society, do require some form of state, or other organization that enforces the law (regardless of whether those laws are written down or are just a set of general moral principles that a society shares). In the state of nature, your rights are really no different than might makes right, essentially, anything you possess the ability to do is a "right". As such, your claim to a right to property, for example, depends on your relative ability to defend it.

>>8702488
>chasers and pedos
who are you kidding? your server is filled with them, thats all pol is you retard

"libertarian"
but this have nothing to do with LGBT. Do you even know what is libertarianism?
If no: you own your own body, no one gives a fuck about who you fuck.

File: (You).jpg (21KB, 374x395px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 374x395px

>>8703606
>no gay will lead a life half as fulfilling as your average happy straight.

being tied down to a fat hausfrau for the rest of your life who refuses sex

or

fucking all the hot dudes you want when you want whenever you want however you want

you're an idiot.

>>8704790
>refuses sex
As if a fucking man cares? She's getting the dick whether she likes it or not. A good woman is always submissive.

>>8704802
russian virgins actually believe this!

>>8704899
You have no idea what it's like to be a man with total dominance over a woman.

>>8704912
>tfw wnb this woman

>>8701016
Trannies are all batshit crazy

Femboys are also batshit crazy but in a different way. Femboys are pathetic broken people who are completely empty inside and need to compensate for how worthless and rejected by others they are. They crave external validation from others, but since they're terrible people the only way they can get any attention at all is by turning themselves into a fetishistic sex object readily available for as many fetishists as possible to use and throw away.

Femboys know that no one will ever love or care for them as a person so they desperately try to get anything even slightly close to positive attention by turning themselves into something meant to be used by others.

>>8707565
You just described trannies.

File: traps for trump.png (347KB, 500x543px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 500x543px

I love /ourtraps/. Cute feminine penis. Fierce masculine brain.

>>8707592
>Fierce masculine brain.
:^)

File: 1502424338983.png (39KB, 335x260px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 335x260px

>>8707594

You're losing your own game. :^)

>>8701016
I like how you listed trans and ftm separately

>>8707719
What did OP mean by that?

>>8707719
>implying listing trans and agp separately isn't the real problem

>>8703606
>If you look at it honestly being homosexual is nothing but a defect.
depends what you mean by 'defect'. we're human beings, darwinism doesn't matter on our level.

>>8701016
Libertarian trannie is the only kind that makes sense. Lefties just take you in to grow their block and erode the rights of other people enough that you won't notice you're next on the chopping block. The right is up-front about eroding your rights, but that just means they shit down your throat rather than slowly drowning you. A march directly towards freedom, without exception, is the only way to open the drain.

>>8701050
idk m8, I'm an MtF and I've never had trouble being successful in the private sector

maybe because I'm more useful than some manual laborer with a chip on their shoulder lmao

>>8711324
I like you.

>>8711029
social darwinfags worship the concept of evolution without understanding its ins and out, they just spam HURR DURR ORIGIN OF DA SPECIE SON ME SIDE without ever reading it. It's an icon, in order words, a Christ figure to proselytize with.

If you get down to actual evolutionary biology with these fuckwads they scatter every time, especially when it starts contradicting the narrative.

File: crayon_melt_canvas_piece_by_athennya-dbiu7n7.jpg (354KB, 1280x1673px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1280x1673px

>>8701016

File: DHC8vf4XkAAKQVJ.jpg:large.jpg (135KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1024x682px

I love Richard Senpai and like white communities

>>8704697
>they lack the capital needed to do so

In a day and a half with thrift store suits you could walk into a private equity form and talk them into signing you a loan if you know what the fuck you're doing.

The smart will prevail no matter the system, the idiots will flounder no matter the system. The hard truth of capitalism is that its laws still apply to you even if you dislike them, and when your economy has collapsed because you kept the idiots above water for too long, well, I guess it is just capitalism's fault.

>>8715702
didnt you hear him whining at the riot cops

the guy is a major beta male

>>8715739
dont insult my husbando

File: 1460514365248.jpg (41KB, 480x468px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x468px

>>8701016
Conservatism in anyone who is not a swm is inherently submissive and therefore feminine. Its the reason why pussy gay dudes, pussy niggers, and pretty feminine women are conservatives. While dykes, angry thug niggers and high testosterone straight women are left wing. They have enough testosterone to stand up for themselves

File: fhc.jpg (2MB, 1500x1466px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1466px

>>8701016
I think their haircut is super cute. I'd love to muss it up a little and watch them get sour about it but then I give him a little peck on the cheek and comb it back into place while reciting the 14 words to him.

>>8715706
>if you know what the fuck you're doing.
Where exactly does one acquire this knowledge?

>>8715836
Wasn't he arrested earlier?

>>8711293
I think this is the most true statement in the group The left will stop protecting your rights the second it becomes inconvenient. Heck, just look at their unwillingness to denounce Islam in the face of its violence towards the LGBT community.

>>8701016

Gay is not a fucking political identity. The left doesn't own us. Believing in a small gov, respect for western values, and despise for PC culture is something everyone should preach.

>>8715739
He is a bit of a fairy, but he's cute and endearing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxfDOOY2H28

>>8715898
>The left will stop protecting your rights the second it becomes inconvenient. Heck, just look at their unwillingness to denounce Islam in the face of its violence towards the LGBT community.

That's because the goal of the left isn't women's rights, or lgbt rights, or black, or mexican rights. The goal of the left, above all else, is the destruction of the white race. Everything else is a means to an end.

>i have to vote a certain way in order to mutilate my genitals or take hormonal poisons

Actually, I just have to be a victim of modernity. Sir.

>>8715924

you're VERY right

File: isisfuntimes.jpg (49KB, 634x354px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 634x354px

Because I'm safer without Muslims in my country than with them

File: Pic.jpg (363KB, 957x1024px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 957x1024px

>>8701016
https://discord.gg/e9pe6Cv

>>8715966
>believing the fake news

wow, how gullible are you?

>>8701016
bump

File: 32883fd1eec357e4e626948841aaa8ba--men-hairstyles-mens-haircuts.jpg (26KB, 350x525px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 350x525px

>>8715854
idk who that is I just googled fashy haircut

>>8715966
persia has accepted gay people for along time. the queen of england killed alan turing for being gay
bro can u even shia vs sunni
so yeah

File: IMG_0988.jpg (392KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 900x1200px

>>8715836

Wonder how cute he is getting gangbanged.

File: donny the punk.jpg (73KB, 559x370px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 559x370px

>>8716542

He's out already and shitposting on Twitter. And Spencer would do alright in jail anyway. Weev survived alright because he was WN aligned and the AB looked after him even if he was a soft fat computer nerd.

Commies don't do so well in jail though :(

http://www.jimgoad.net/pdf/prison/donny.pdf

>>8716715
>Commies don't do so well in jail though
Okay, that's pretty funny.

>>8715702
Same. I didn't give a shit about him before but I watched a video he posted on twitter and he looked really cute and sounded very well spoken and now I love him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62WXBkDdImg
i don't even care if richard spencer is controlled opposition i want him

File: huh.jpg (25KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x512px

>>8701016
why would it be strange for an lgbt person to be libertarian????? the whole point is to let people do whatever the fuck they want without regulation!!!! Just cause you cant be a nazi hate speech supporter??

guise.. neo liberalism is fascism

classical libralism is libertarianism

>>8716820
Some people in this thread are uncomfortable with the idea of someone being able to decide who they bake cakes for.

>>8715988
This post in undeserving of those dubs. Server is trash, beyond all the pedo stuff that goes on. Admin is both a hooknosed jew and a huge diva.

Being a man with XX chromosomes has nothing to do with my belief in small government and low taxes.

File: alt_cuck.png (290KB, 497x732px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 497x732px

>>8716879
You know the obvious reason for this is? The liberal media has brainwashed kids to love authoritarianism for this reason and believe that a strong central government is necessary to protect minorities from evil state governmnets. Meanwhile theyre butthurt about trumpo.

FUCKING KIDS THESE DAYS

We've got a solid social base and people are about as accepting as they can be without trying to force social progress. We need to move on to economic issues because that's the most pressing issue at the moment.

>>8716879
You can just say you don't serve liberal or pro-LGBT people, you can easily make up something to refuse service, most hicks are just too stupid to know to do so.

>>8716977
the point is they shouldnt have to make up an excuse

businesses should be able to refuse service for any reason

File: heh.png (151KB, 860x758px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 860x758px

>>8717003
yeah so what happens when centralized authority changes with the swing of the pendulum and trannies and gays get fucked over by someone like TRUMP?

MAYBE DECENTRALIZING AUTHORITY WASNT SUCH A BAD IDEA HMMMM?

>>8716542
Spencer survived Euro prison full of muslims, so he can survive US prison easily.

File: fashwave.png (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>8716805

Oh wow. That choice in music... it suits him and the whole alt-right thing. I guess fashwave really is a thing.

Maybe fashwave will also be a bridge for gay people to get into right-wing politics.

>>8717158
It will serve the authoritarian left right when the pendulum swings.

If they want to use the state as a weapon then they legitimize us doing the same by giving us no alternative.

File: BRAINLET.png (925KB, 996x3150px) Image search: [Google]

925KB, 996x3150px

>>8717955
yeah or split up the power structure and give states more rights so that you can choose to live in california if youre a fago or texas if you like infowars

winner takes all means we all lose

>>8717966
Thanks to them choosing where to live if you want a different culture isn't on the table. They made it winner takes all, we should aim to win.

>>8716967
Greater emphasis on "states' rights" wouldn't really do anything good for LGBT people, considering how many states are still full of backwards homophobes. So for the time being, the federal government is kind of necessary to protect equality for LGBT people. Letting a state government rule over you rather than a federal one isn't really "freedom" anyway, so until stateless society becomes viable, people's best option is to simply support whichever state agrees with them the most.

>>8717158
So by that logic we shouldn't have ANY laws at all, because what if "the bad people" end up in charge of the laws. And "decentralizing authority" is no real improvement, you're still living under an oppressive authority. Just because the authority is geographically closer to you doesn't mean it's any more friendly.

>>8718569
>So by that logic we shouldn't have ANY laws at all, because what if "the bad people" end up in charge of the laws
So just take away the ability of the government to discriminate at all. The government shouldn't even be involved in marriage, or telling business owners who they can serve. If the government doesn't have the power to oppress you, it can't oppress you.

I don't really see how any of this contradicts.

>>8702593

No, they aren't conservative. The Right wing isn't just conservationism. Economically, they're right wing and socially they're mostly anarchists, not believing the state should play any role in interpersonal relationships or culture.

>>8704697
>>posts a socialist who was killed by right-wingers
he was a national socialist, maybe even a strasserist, that's far from the type of socialist you talk about

>>8718597
>If the government doesn't have the power to oppress you, it can't oppress you.
Conversely, if you want to use the government to oppress others, you deserve it when others use it to oppress you.

>>8718656
It's my understanding that the Strasserists were actual socialists, but nationalists as well. Whereas the later "national socialists" were pretty much just nationalists who kept the socialist name to appeal to the working class.

>>8718597
The government isn't the only one who can oppress though. If bigots can't use the government as a weapon, they'll find another one.

File: Mackensen.jpg (101KB, 751x1049px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 751x1049px

>>8718808
>Whereas the later "national socialists" were pretty much just nationalists who kept the socialist name to appeal to the working class.
wrong, Hitler enacted a lot of reforms that helped the working class and promoted animals right and other good things, nat soc means nat soc, Röhm was not far from that point and the same the strasserites, the main difference between nat socs/strasserites and commies is that they do not try to push cultural marxism and the destruction of the society and the state while also exposing the international jewry (some other socialist thinkers did already like Sorel and some fascists were at first commies like Mussolini or Doriot), the main point of separation between Röhm and Hilter was the role of the SA, Röhm wanted it to replace the wehrmacht and Hitler did not want to replace it to appease some more conservative (aristocrats) factions within the NSDAP (most of the sons of the Kaiser Wilhelm II were nazis)
>pic related, Mackensen, one of the conservative elements that supported the NSDAP

>>8701016
>libertarian
>mtf
because i support freedom and everyone's right to do whatever they want dog

>>8718808
>If bigots can't use the government as a weapon, they'll find another one.
Murder and assault is still illegal, regardless of who it is done to.

>>8718952
You can harm people without physically assaulting them. And there's a long history of physical violence (even murder) against trans people being ignored and not punished, even though it's technically illegal.

>>8719038
>You can harm people without physically assaulting them
Meanly shouting at people shouldn't be illegal.

>And there's a long history of physical violence (even murder) against trans people being ignored and not punished, even though it's technically illegal.
And that ought to be fixed, although I don't see how more laws are going to prevent that.

File: EMPEROR HADRIAN.jpg (35KB, 288x426px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 288x426px

>>8701016
Being gay and burning kikes is inseparable.

>>8701016
It's called being a cuck

>>8718926
>the main point of separation between Röhm and Hilter was the role of the SA
There was also Himmler being jealous of Röhm's position.

File: himmler_meme.jpg (148KB, 500x549px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 500x549px

>>8719788
yes he was, Himmler was such a nasty bitch, he wasted lots of money searching for a vacuous stupidities, I think in the end when Himmler betrayed Hitler and opened communications with the allies, Hitler saw his error

>>8701016
>Explain to me why you choose to align yourself with political positions that have a long track record of success vs the alternative
Uh

>>8704697
Models exist that have worked for decades where you require 0 startup capital. Take subscription based models. Pay in advance models. Matchmaker models.

3 of many types of business models in which you get your customers money upfront to run the business or don't even need to own supply at all.

Its not about resources its about a lack of resourcefulness. Stupid people will never have it so fuck do they matter. They're the wageslaves in capitalism. But even a wageslave who saves accordingly can retire early with a substantial sum of money.

Stupid people will always be stupid and no system in the world can fix that.

>>8704912
Thats just rape you manchild virgin

>>8707565
This is true
>cries internally

File: 1484255605590.png (100KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 500x281px

>>8701050
this is literally the dumbest thing i've ever seen on this board

File: ree.png (710KB, 469x630px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 469x630px

>>8716542

File: 1502654899433m.jpg (51KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1024x683px

>>8701016
Materialism is retarded, denying biological determinism is retarded, Hobbes > Rousseau.

Any questions fuckbois?

>>8701016
>tfw very left and very anti-authority
>tfw i want a femboy i can dominate and have authority over

my dicks a fascist

File: download (4).jpg (12KB, 206x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 206x245px

>>8725743
Anarchists are fascist desu
>It's not an internal police force, it's just a "counter revolutionary control squad"
>*Kills unarmed civilians and priests*

>>8707565
This.
Lgb not lgb(((t)))

>>8722797
its ok ill be ur neckbeard whiteknight bf

>>8725749
I dont know that I qualify as an anarchist, I would never desire the overthrow of the us govt, I just have a different idea of what they should be doing and how they should be doing it (and im optimistic we can do that without violent revolution)

>>8701016


Well, if you are a man and live a life roleplaying as a woman, why wouldn't you also roleplay as nazis every once in a while too?

After Orlando, the left has proven untrustworthy and lots of trannies are into militaria and such.

File: oh_smug.jpg (8KB, 246x205px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 246x205px

>>8725749
yeah cuz anarchy is ALWAYS SOMETHING YOU JUST DECLARE AT ONCE (no)

practical anarchists are those who want to undermine centralized authoritarian institutions by replacing them with equally effective (counts for ethics as well) decentralized solutions

uber and lyft are the best examples of this because they undermined the taxi certificate goon squad and let everyone become their own taxi company

>>8726240
please GTFO what the CNT FAI did to Barcelona was worse than the italians bombings, they reconverted several buildings to checas and other type of prisons and interrogatory areas that make 1984 and guantanamo bay look like children tales. Anarchists are as shitty as any other commies and all your ideological dialectic will not change that both of you are equally oppressive and a cancer to society which should be extirpated

I have more to my identity than sucking random mens dicks. I have my ancestry, my family history, my genetic heritage, my emotional and spiritual ties to the land around me.

No im not a nazi. Im also not a leftist and definitely not a retarded fucking commie

>>8715814
absolutely retarded perspective

File: db8.gif (288KB, 500x297px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 500x297px

>>8726240
>practical anarchists are those who want to undermine centralized authoritarian institutions by replacing them with equally effective (counts for ethics as well) decentralized solutions
More practical anarchists resort to violence when they can't decentralize everything they want as History has already shown
>Lyft and Uber
>Decentralized
>Mfw

File: down_smugi.jpg (30KB, 300x338px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 300x338px

>>8727142
yeah lyft and uber arent perfect but if they used blockchain for reviews and crypto for payment then it would be and its a good first step towards breaking the regulation goon squad

and yeah faggot anarchists smash starbucks but im talking about practical anarchy which doenst condone that, ironically antifa does, and the extremes of every political ideology are similar.

your logic is fukken retarded

>yeah but these other people who rep the same mildly related ideology are doing bad things so your ideology is stupid which posits the exact opposite behavior

>your example isnt perfect and i completely missed the point

what better ideas do you have? keep appealing to authoritarianism so that ur at mercy of the political pendulum and someone like trump can undue nearly a decade of "progress" and psychiatrists control if you get HRT or not?

I don't have to explain shit given how obnoxious leftist gays and other trannies behave reminder some of you are why we're hated you know who you are

File: lgbt.jpg (324KB, 529x577px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 529x577px

>>8729584
thnx +1 (like)

File: ancap.png (586KB, 650x1350px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 650x1350px

>>8727767
Lyft and Uber are capitalist institutions, I don't really see how any left-wing anarchist can support them.

Right Wing Libertarian who loves the military here. Bi, possible trap at some point.
People have the right to be and do whatever the hell they want so long as they don't infringe upon the rights of others, if I want boobs big brother shouldn't tell me no, I believe in serving my country, protecting my fellow people and their ability to dowhatever makes them happy in life. Free market is ultimately the best for the economy because voluntary exchanges are the only just ones as long as monopolies cannot be formed. To quote daddy aka Austin Petersen,"I want to live in a world where gay married couples can defend their marijuana fields with fully automatic machineguns."

File: hehhheh_smug.jpg (66KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 500x500px

>>8729686
omg holy fucking shit

Theyre not perfect but they show that decentralized models CAN work which is a good first step. The next step is for someone to come up with a crypto version of uber or lyft. Patreon is also an imperfect decentralized model for the future that is begging for cryptofication. Both models allow someone to work for another person and get paid but they use a corporate model to ensure trust but trust itself can be decentralized through crypto aka blockchain. Ever heard of cypher punks or crypto anarchists?

And i have nothing against capitalist institutions except i dont like working in the classic 9-5 kind but that doesnt mean they shouldnt exist. There can also be marxist institutions competing in a free market. No one is stopping anyone from organizing a firm where the workers control production. The problem is that millennials are too stuck up their own asses to create one to show that marxism works and just complain and want a big scary government to tell everyone what to do for them which is retarded.

Anyway I know this is a lot for someone like you to process so i will summarize my post as simply as a i can.

Lyft and uber allow people to work for themselves but take a cut but in the future crypto can eliminate the imperfect corporate part. And I support freedom in general so I think that corporations and firms of all kinds should be allowed to exist and compete on the open market. I want everyone to be happy and get a chance to work in the way that suits them the best.

>>8730010
(yes)

>>8730010
Except the marriage isn't based on a government contract, but more of a social agreement.

>>8730010
wtf is with all the bi and/or trans libertarians?

>>8733261
even better!

>>8732157
>And i have nothing against capitalist institutions except i dont like working in the classic 9-5 kind but that doesnt mean they shouldnt exist. There can also be marxist institutions competing in a free market
So you're like a voluntarist then? Okay, I was just confused cause most anarchists tend to be violently opposed to most corporations.

>>8734191
could be mutualist as well, or a market anarchist

File: milo.jpg (1MB, 1618x1214px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1618x1214px

>>8733273
>>8733273
wtf is up with all the gay authoritarians?

oh yeah cause theyre literal faggots

milo's not a fgt tho

>>8734191
>>8734199
>>8734191
>>8734199
>puting urself into a box
i thought u guys were supposed to get out of closets

>>8733261
the government needs to get out of telling people who they can or can't marry

>>8733273
because the government needs to get the fuck out of my bedroom, my gun closet, and my life, along with everyone else"s

>>8737363
marriage is a government contract.
if you're libertarian, why do you even need one?

>>8737406
>Libertarian
>government invasion into what is a private matter between individuals
>for "tax breaks" when the libertarian believes in abolishing 90% of the tax code anyway
>even passively in support of marriage contracts

>>8701050
>I don't know anything about economics: the post

>>8737370
protip: they aren't there to make you happy.
they are there because it benefits them and they are more powerful than you.

>>8704790
Hot dude? I’ve been online there’s a lot of guys, but few I’d call hot. Also I’m ugly.

>>8737406
"Libertarians" who support gay marriage aren't libertarians.

Homosexuality is the last bastion of implicit whiteness.

>>8701016
>tfw conservative at heart but pretty much always vote straight ticket dem because of how fucked republicucks are right now

The US political system is pretty fucked at this point. Voting for economics (just about the most important role of the government) is pointless because politicians on either side do the same shit and then siphon a bunch of money into pork barrel projects to get themselves reelected. The only thing that your votes will affect are the relatively unimportant issues like abortion and gay marriage the parties parade around because they don't want you to look to closely at the real issues both parties have failed to solve. So being lgbt voting democratic is obviously in my best interest.

It's funny because what most appeals to me the most about conservatism is individualism, independence, using common sense and best practice rather than having the government micromanage everything. But it just turns out that republicans just want to ban everyone who's not a straight white male and just want to get ride of the government programs so it's easier for them to line their pockets. Dems aren't looking too bright but at least they're not pushing bathroom laws and at least tried some sort of healthcare reform (unlike republicans who campaigned on healthcare reform for 8+ years, and suddenly now they hold the potus, house, senate, no reform because after 8 years everyone realizes they don't give a shit about healthcare they just needed to fuel their campaign off the hatred of Obama, a black man).

I honestly don't see much of a future for our country unless citizens decide to remind politicians that they represent us not their own fat, lazy behinds. Not even an edgy anarch just pointing out the obvious, peaceful protest is a meme and these fucks deserve the guillotine.

>>8703630
>Survivorship bias, the post

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1827/

Also privilege has nothing do do with race or gender like the fat first-world SJWs like to complain. Okay it has a little bit to do with it, I guess, but by far the biggest distinguisher is simply economic class at birth. Plain and simple. You were resourceful, hardworking, and lucky. You made it good. That's great for you. But for the vast majority of people born in poverty they will stay in poverty because they don't have the same resources, the same education, they have more hurdles, they don't have money. Some others have every comfort and have everything set on the plate for them to reach out and grab. Meritocracy is a sham.

A race is not a fair race if some people start scattered across the length of the race. Sure, some people at the back may overtake some people at the front if they work extra extra hard, but the rules are still bad and got to be changed.

>>8737722
>it just turns out that republicans just want to ban everyone who's not a straight white male
[citation needed]

>>8703606
It's only a defect if you subscribe to the idea that the only purpose of life is to produce offspring. Human civilization has long since passed the point where we need everyone to reproduce or risk dying out as a species, and now life can be about so many more things than just reproducing, to the point where you can live a happy, fulfilling life without ever needing to produce your own kids. If you still fuck it up its not because your gay, it's because you failed, just like all the straight people who fuck up and have shit lives.

>>8738694
I was born poor but ended up doing well. I think this is because success is caused by intelligence and talent which correlates with economic class at birth, and when the race is so long the starting positions don't make much difference.

File: Deutch.jpg (313KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1600x900px

>>8701016
Nope. You queers aren't gonna steal the Swastika too.

File: 1474525621522.jpg (80KB, 450x298px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 450x298px

There's nothing wrong with being patriotic and freedom-loving, though.

You can be a conservative and not hate gays. Libertarians, real ones, believe in liberty and will fight for everyone's rights. It's only when you get to the far end of either side, right or left, that people start advocating to take away people's rights.

I consider myself a libertarian for the most part. The vast majority of libertarians I know couldn't care less what people do in their own homes as long as it's not harming someone that isn't into that. Most libertarians are constitutional literalists. Most of us don't like laws that are open to interpretation. If a law can be interpreted, it's a bad law.

>>8725749
What's wrong with killing priests?