How likely will there be a push in the future for adding pedophilia

>>8694771
There will not. Members of the LGBT community strongly oppose it.

Two adults can consent to having sex with other, regardless of their sex

Animals can't consent
Children can't consent

Fuck off

pedosexual buttangry because EVERY LAST PERSON IN THE WORLD despises his fetish and there is NOTHING he can do about it

enjoy fed fuck me in the ass prison

PS: stop latching onto bestialityfags because they're a SLIGHT more socially acceptable then your degeneracy

>>8694771
Pedophilia is a muslim thing, and it's being pushed as a muslim thing.

>>8694771
You really shouldn't be judging LGBT+ people and the legitimacy of their interests by what you *think* they *might* advocate for *at some unknown point in the future*
At that point you're treating your own imagination like an objective information source.
It is not a good way of understanding or forming a position on other groups or causes, particularly those you don't fully understand or agree with.

>>8694771
who cares most of us will be dead

>>8694777
But children can consent to transitioning ?

>>8695195
Children can't consent to transitioning without their parents say so or an emancipation. They can't consent to ANY medical treatment, in fact, your legal guardian has to sign the disclaimer form.

Count on a pedosexual not to know how psychiatric practice works. It's okay to abuse kids, but not rehabilitate them, right? Scum. Get raped in prison.

File: uE5VZir.jpg (103KB, 700x697px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 700x697px

>>8694771
I think Fat Acceptance is the next great civil rights battle.

Pedos and Furries are gonna have to wait since most of us find them disgusting and children and animals can't consent and so technically there is no way for their perversion to ever become legal.

File: fJmAfDP.png (582KB, 802x930px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 802x930px

>>8695195
Transitioning doesn't involve some old man sticking his dick in your little girl, so it is easier for parents and lawmakers to acquiesce to it.

The law is just a collection of people's opinions, which is why it changes over time.

>>8694777
Are you a vegetarian?

File: NwXHz3n.jpg (19KB, 612x365px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 612x365px

>>8695286
So you're saying that because we can kill animals and eat them, then we should be able to fuck them.

Seems logical, but people make the laws to match their feelings/intuition and fucking animals just seems gross.

You're probably going to have to have a furry pride parade and march in the streets in your wolf costume for 40 years before people give up and let you fuck your dog legally.

Or you could just keep that shit to yourself and have some discretion, like most sexual deviants.

Once the trans movement succeeds the next big push will be for polyamorous people, and we'll be seeing a lot more of those relationships in teens and there'll be a giant wave of YouTubers declaring the death of western civilization has finally occurred. There'll also be dozens of "POLYAMORY CRINGE COMPILATIONS" and a subreddit dedicated to hating on these types of people, created after a subreddit dedicated for the poly community grows exponentially.