how does /lgbt/ feel about obvious pandering in different forms

>>8681042
>dream daddy
>pandering

The game was basically made as a joke that was taken seriously.

>>8681042
This really isn't any more pandering than a dating sim of all straight people is

also, it's like 80% a joke

>>8681113
>>8681103

''ironic'' pandering is still pandering. the gay community are basic bitch consumers who don't realise they are being exploited by corporations. next thing i know, you are gonna be talking about how lockheed martin and apple accept you and care for you because they get floats at pride parades.

>>8681122
>exploited by corporations

Yes.

Making a product or service that appeals to me, in such a way that I willingly exchange my own money for it, is certainly exploitation.

Certainly.

>>8681128
Don’t you know that EVERYTHING is pandering, and that when you show support to something that you like you're being exploited? And that no matter what it is or what the reason is for you're a simple sheep with no awareness of your actions?

>>8681148
Agree with your sarcasm.

Communist propaganda talking points are just fucking crazy though.

if the game grumps didn't have any part in this no one would've cared

they knew if they made a "game" centered round lgbt topics and characters people would eat that shit up

>>8681223
I think it was more they knew ironic dad jokes and use of "daddy" in sexual situations is a hot topic right now