>trans gets to be part of lgbt despite not being a sexual

>>8577581
got pills got purp got weed got white in the the trap all night

>only trannies hate pedophiles
Poor bait, kill yourself pedoscum. None of us want you.

>sister who
What the fuck is this semi-ironic new age meme garbage?

Is this the hottest new meme?

>>8577581
but us trannies are automatically at least a little gay regardless of who we hook up with, so we kinda can't not be a little bit LGB too...

>implying I want to be associated with gays
nothing against them but bundling trans and gay together only affects us negatively

Even if trans people are removed from the acronym, pedophiles (yes, that is the word for you, not pedosexual, which isn't a word) will never be accepted and should never be accepted. Many trannies are suicidal and depressed, but the only group that deserves to be suicidal are pedophiles. You want to have sex with a goddamn child. Do you have any idea how morally and ethically wrong that is? Put a knife into your throat and leave it there as you reflect on why the hell you think this is okay.

>>8577581
Pedophilia is a fetish. Pedophiles can be sexually attracted to normal aged people just fine while also being sexually attracted to children. It is not a sexuality but a preference.
People who want to fuck kids should not be accepted into society because dud you even read this sentence

>>8578065
So is bisexuality is a fetish?

>>8578065
>homosexuality is a fetish. Gays can be sexually attracted to women just fine while also being sexually attracted to men. It is not a sexuality but a preference. People who want to fuck men should not be accepted into society because dud you even read this sentence

>>8577960
Does it not bother you that that's the exact same rhetoric that was used and gays and transgender in the past? Why does it only become okay when it's a rank below you?

>>8578092
children can't consent how do people still not get this

File: kicking ass.jpg (148KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 490x490px

HEY RITA!

>>8578100
It's not that straight people don't get that. It's that to them consent is an evil thing. Children being unable to consent is precisely what makes children appealing to them.

>>8578077
No. Bisexuals are sexually attracted to both sexes. Males and females.
>>8578092
Homosexuality is sexual attraction to the same sex. Homosexuals are not sexually attracted to women, because they are homosexual. You actual retard.

File: 1476139150478.png (228KB, 400x514px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 400x514px

>>8577581
What do you know, the freak that spams nuns is a pedo.

This is a complete surprise to nobody.

>>8577960
>Do you have any idea how morally and ethically wrong that is? Put a knife into your throat and leave it there as you reflect on why the hell you think this is okay.

There are a lot of pedophiles who know how bad that is and hate themselves for having these feelings towards children. It's not their choice you retard.

People like you are the reason why they are too afraid to get help and end up losing control.

>>8578143
>Homosexuals are not sexually attracted to women
>what is a homosexual woman

You retard you forgot lesbians exist again!

File: IMG_0169.png (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>8577581
>pedosexuals
I honestly agree with the trannies on this one. Pedophilia is not ok, and those who commit need to die. I do find their lumping with us homos a bit weird considering they are drastically different, but I would rather be lumped in with trannies than pedos.

>>8577581
Trans is a sexual orientation though. Autogynephilia/autoandrophilia.

>>8577581
Reminder to sage and report the ban evading pedophile. He's starting to spam pedophilia and he's about to escalate to posting CP

>>8578951
>meanwhile, in the retard's imagination...

>>8578971
You admit to pedodphile actions and get mad when people call you a pedo

>>8577960
I don't think gay sex is OK but I do it anyways

>>8577960
Thoughts are not illegal or immoral, and pedophilia is a brain miswiring, not a voluntary choice.

http://www.virped.org exists for people who are pedophiles and want a support group of understanding people who agree it's wrong to watch CP or touch kids.

Child molestation is the crime, pedophilia is the disorder.

Get it straight, ffs.

>>8578065
Pedophiles can be sexually attracted to normal aged people just fine while also being sexually attracted to children.
It's not a fetish, it's a brain disorder.

"Inclusive" pedophiles can be attracted secondarily to adults. "Exclusive" or "fixated" pedophiles are ONLY attracted to children.

>>8578109
This is more of that "rape is about power, not sex," meme. No, it's also frequently and primarily about sex. Child molestation (on the part of preferential offenders, anyway) is mostly about sexual attraction, only rarely about "power." Non-preferential offenders (people who molest for reasons other than sexual attraction to children) are generally in it for a power trip and out of lack of self-control, but then we're not talking about pedophiles anymore.

/thread cluelessness

>>8579239
*missed the green text on "Pedophiles can be sexually attracted to normal aged people just fine while also being sexually attracted to children," obviously, hope it's still clear.

>>8577960
Please stop making this world a worse place by stigmatizing pedophiles like that. Being a pedophile means they're attracted to children; plenty people have that attraction and never act on it. I can't imagine anybody wanting to be like that and people like you isolate them the until they lash out. Only person that deserves to be suicidal is you.

>>8578579
Retarded meme terms, Blanchard is a quack you faggot

>>8578100
Yeah but they can consent to changing there gender right????

>>8577581
Kill yourself.

>>8578343
The cognitive dissonance in this thread is stong as fuck. Sex is not inherently harmful in anyway seeing as how every person in this thread started masturbating at like 12. Rape =/= consensual sex you hypocritical fucks. Everyone on this board was in the very same position that pedos were a few decades ago. If I could jerk my little ding dong at 12 how does it make any logical sense for me to have been mind broken for the rest of my life if someone else had done it for me.

>>8579258
Note the pedophiles are usually the ones pushing this typology the most.

Divide and conquer, anyone?

>>8580329
Only pedophiles wanting to get their dick wet argue that children can consent. I know how I was at 12, I couldn't consent to getting my fucking feet rubbed. Most of the world's population is the same.

Pedophiles desperately want to relive the shota fantasies they never experienced in youth so they trick themselves into thinking they could've consented at that age to justify the projection of their childhood fantasies onto the world.

Hang yourself.

>>8580335
Why would we want to destroy anything. latching unto this movement is the only hope of us being accepted. Think about it

>>8580344
There is no hope you'll ever be accepted, might as well join the axe murderers and rapists on Death Row now.

>>8577581
Just stop talking to >>8577581

He's taking advantage of the mods being away. Report him and don't bother discussing anything with the pedophile

>>8580354
The more he spews the more sane people will want to avoid his cause, though. I say give him his voice - he's only hurting himself in the long run. Nobody on Earth is ever going to defend a pedophile, we inherently equate them with the literal scum on our bootheels.

>>8580343
What negative aspect does sex hold that it requires a special level of knowledge in order to participate in.

Here is an example to bring societies cognitive dissonance into the light. BY LAW children can consent to sex with each other and and will not be penalized for doing so, if the special knowledge necessary for children to be able to make the decision to have sex was say pregnancy, stds and limits how can society think that the knowledge between two children is greather than that of an adult and a child? Can you see the cognitive dissonance now? Dont be a sheep think about it.

>>8580360
>wah wah wah why didn't anyone rail my shota hole at 12

Because you were too ugly of a child. Looks like you didn't even need to get fiddled to end up fucked in the head though.

>>8580355
He's posted cp before. You're better off purging him quick.

>>8580368
I hope he spams pizza again, I want him to groan scratch his grotesque hairy stomach and reset his router for the 39230923th time.

>>8580347
The exact same was said for the inhabitants of this board and as usual you cant come with any logical reasons for your hate because its the same thing as the religious dogma that kept lgbt down for the longest time just societal dog piling.

>>8580355
Nobody on earth would have defended a homosexual a few years ago. The instinct is to protect children due to the huge sex negativity present in society sex is seen as something inherently bad so wanting to have sex with a child is seen as wanting to hurt that child which is ludicrous.

>>8580382
>no you we're just like *insert scapegoat here*

No you're not, you're a disgusting pedophile. Castrate yourself before you hurt a kid.

>>8580382
John Wayne gaycey is not okay. He will never be okay.

>>8580360
>how can society think that the knowledge between two children is greather than that of an adult and a child?
It's not about knowledge, you mongoloid, it's about a power imbalance and a betrayal of trust.

I was molested as a kid, and the greatest damage doesn't come from the act itself; it comes from the fact that someone who is supposed to protect you from harm used you for their own gratification. The betrayal is deep and instinctive - you don't have to know what sex is to realize immediately that something is wrong and they did something bad to you.

On top of that, being able to masturbate YOUR OWN BODY is a far cry from being prepared for more adult sexual relations. I got into my parent's porn as a kid and was really upset by it - that has nothing to do with what I did with my own body.

And finally, you're incorrect that children cannot abuse each other. "Sex" between children is a complicated issue, but it ISN'T always legal. There are pre-teen kids on sex registries for molesting even younger kids.

My first molester was only a few years older than me, but she abused that age difference and how easily she could manipulate me into doing what she wanted. She did this to all the younger children in our neighbourhood. If she had been caught, she probably would have faced legal consequences.

>>8580367
I think your examples are gravitating towards an adult giver and child receiver due to the homosexual nature of this board but you neglect the other side of the coin, the side that also helps to display the strong cognitive dissonance. In this society an older woman with a younger male is only disparaged in public due to the need for 'equality,' behind closed doors these male are given high accolades for such an accomplishment with many saying that they wish the were in the same position at their age. These males do not grow up to be scarred for life, infact it gives a boost to the ego that improves their self esteem. In the opposing scenario the female is told that they are a victim, repeatedly, so they are. The act itself is not the determining factor but what the child is told after the fact, as it relates to consensual sex. The same is shown with slut shaming for example which I am sure you are against. Its literally the same thing, think about it

>>8580399
Why did you bother feeding a mongoloid any of this? He's just going to claim your problems don't matter because they don't involve getting his dick wet.

You don't get it. When you have ONE FETISH and you NEED to get off to that ONE FETISH, you will do or say anything to get to that ONE FETISH. It's always the same. Pedophiles get consumed by their own degeneracy just like the AGPs...

>muh why is pedophilia not accepted among lgbt
To the Middle East with you.
Or Canada.
Your pick.

>>8580416
>wah wah wah why didn't anyone rail me in the shotahole when I was 12 I was soooooooo lonely ;_;

It's not getting any better for you

>>8580416
Hi, I'm >>8580399. I'm a bisexual male, two of my molesters were female, and it fucked me up for years.

Additionally, my first boyfriend (also bisexual) was abused by his female nanny and he is practically a walking copy of the DSM as a result.

The double standard surrounding male abusers of girls versus female abusers of boys infuriates me, and the people saying, "wish I was him," were not abused and have no conception of how terrible it is.

>>8580424
Most people have no comprehension of what abuse does to you, hence why sheltered suburbanites developed shotacon fetishes that evolved into full blown pedophilia over time. The honest ones admit they're sadists that get off to emotional abuse.

>>8580418
It's not so much for the pro-contact piece of shit as it is for anyone who might be swayed by what he has to say.

In undergrad, I spent several months doing a study of "child lover" forums and their subculture. I was really struck by how many young guys went to those sites thinking that child molestation was wrong and determined to abstain from touching kids. They just wanted company, socialization with people who they could say, "I'm a pedophile" to and not be hated immediately. And then the pro-contact scum drag them down - first it's rationalizing pro-contact as a political stance ("the law is wrong, but I don't want to go to prison so I won't really do it") to actually molesting a child ("the law is wrong so it's fine so long as I don't get caught").

Pro-contacters who are ignored just scurry off to some other part of the internet and say the same shit, and young guys will sometimes listen.

Don't ignore, push back on their rhetoric directly.

>When you have ONE FETISH and you NEED to get off to that ONE FETISH, you will do or say anything to get to that ONE FETISH.
I have a fetish, and this is utterly untrue. I do not hurt people who can't or don't consent.

Pedophilia is a miswiring of the limbic system and it is NOT a fetish.

>>8579410

voluntarily expressing a gender is different to consenting to a sexual request.

Kids don't ask for medical treatment, but kids will identify with a gender and asked to be recognized as such.

Keep in mind that transgender children are usually the most solidly transgender individuals and the most successful at effecting a gender transition.

the reason why kids can't consent to sex is that children do not experience sexual attraction in the same way that adults do, they consent to sex due to some form of pressure, and the experience is uniformly traumatic.

Of course... once puberty begins at 11-13, these lines begin to blur.

>>8580399
>It's not about knowledge, you mongoloid, it's about a power imbalance and a betrayal of trust

All relationships no matter what have a degree of power imbalances its the reason we have alimony and child support laws sex should not be outlawed because of that.


>I was molested as a kid, and the greatest damage doesn't come from the act itself; it comes from the fact that someone who is supposed to protect you from harm used you for their own gratification. The betrayal is deep and instinctive - you don't have to know what sex is to realize immediately that something is wrong and they did something bad to you.

I cant really comment on this point without knowing more but I am assuming that the 'molestation' was not violent and will address the point from that frame.

I am in agreement with you that this person was most likely using you which was wrong and as i child you could perceive that and it did harm you but I have to disagree that it ws the sex in and of itself a simple illustration of this are child stars who were in no way physically abused by their parents but were pushed and used due to how wealthy it would make said parents without much concern for the child the same mental damage occurs and once again it is not inherent to sex.


>On top of that, being able to masturbate YOUR OWN BODY is a far cry from being prepared for more adult sexual relations. I got into my parent's porn as a kid and was really upset by it - that has nothing to do with what I did with my own body.


I did not bring up masturbation to say that they were the same, The are obviously different but that is not the problem here. What i wanted was for someone to explain in detail why masturbation would cause less harm when done by oneself than if someone else were to masturbate you, in otherwords they helped you to get something without gaining anything themselves. To the point on finding porn i dont want to disregard it but i believe you would find yourself in the minority.

>>8580458
>Kids don't ask for medical treatment
Kids can and will as soon as they know medical treatment is necessary to be recognized as their gender. I was asking for medical treatment around 9-10ish.

>>8580455
>miswiring of the limbic system

All fetishes are linked with the limbic system.

>suffix -philia
>not a fetish

Okay armchair enjoy disagreeing with the DSM like the typical blanchard autists on here, I'm surrreee you'll be coming up with a groundbreaking new theory that'll change everything because you're special! Like copernicus! overthrow the system! stop caring about any knowledge you're taught and just make up bullshit all day long because that's in now.

>>8580399
Post was becoming too long

>And finally, you're incorrect that children cannot abuse each other. "Sex" between children is a complicated issue, but it ISN'T always legal. There are pre-teen kids on sex registries for molesting even younger kids.

There will be differences in regions but this is the case more than often and you are ignoring the point i was trying make which is: If children can have sex with each other without consequence(not all) why would the same not be true for adults and children

>My first molester was only a few years older than me, but she abused that age difference and how easily she could manipulate me into doing what she wanted. She did this to all the younger children in our neighbourhood. If she had been caught, she probably would have faced legal consequences.

This type of manipulation is another example of the power imbalance I was referring to that is present in all relationships adults can just as easily be manipulated by someone more experienced. You can see this in the PUA communities where people are literally taught how to manipulate women into having sex. Once again the manipulation and not sex inherently.

>>8580466
>All relationships no matter what have a degree of power imbalances
But as a society, we recognize that some relationships have MUCH bigger power imbalances than others. That's why your workplace probably bans your supervisor from having a relationship with you.

There are few LARGER power imbalances than between adults and children.

>ou could perceive that and it did harm you but I have to disagree that it ws the sex in and of itself
That is literally what I said.

Problem here is that you are not going to separate the adult seeking gratification from the sexual act. There's no way adult-child sex exists that is not a betrayal of trust.

.What i wanted was for someone to explain in detail why masturbation would cause less harm when done by oneself than if someone else were to masturbate you, in otherwords they helped you to get something without gaining anything themselves.
And that's just it. They DO gain something. You are utterly deluded if you think a child does not perceive the pedophile's own interest in the act.

>>8580418
The proposition I am making is that us 'getting off' to our fetish can be done such that it is mutually beneficial to both parties, Do you disagree?

>>8580494
>If children can have sex with each other without consequence(not all) why would the same not be true for adults and children

>This type of manipulation is another example of the power imbalance I was referring to that is present in all relationships adults can just as easily be manipulated by someone more experienced.

Noting here that I've explained all this. The power imbalance between a 13-year-old and 9-year-old is many, many times greater than that between an experienced adult and a less experienced adult.

The difference between anyone 18+ and anyone below 12 is many times greater than that.

This isn't hard.

>>8580419
>canada
Where it is illegal to even own loli doujinshi

>middle east
where homosexuals are thrown off roofs and women are second class citizens. I am satisfied being in clandestine relationships with children i meet of facebook thank you very much.

>>8580421

>It's not getting any better for you

Fortunately that is not the case

>>8580480
>All fetishes are linked with the limbic system.
But they aren't a result of actual malformations. My understanding is that pedophilia seems to be associated with parts of the limbic system not maturing properly.

>Okay armchair enjoy disagreeing with the DSM
If you want to invoke the DSM, go for it:

http://jaapl.org/content/42/4/404

>Second, at present, in discussing Pedophilia, DSM-5 makes reference to the term Pedophilic Sexual Orientation. Sexual Orientation is ordinarily used to designate the category, or categories, of persons whom a given individual finds to be sexually appealing. Those who are heterosexually oriented are sexually attracted to adults of the opposite sex; those who are homosexual, to adults of the same sex; men with a heterosexual pedophilic orientation, to prepubescent females; and men with a homosexual pedophilic orientation, to prepubescent boys.

>In the face of significant criticism of its inclusion in the DSM-5, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has stated its intention to remove the term Pedophilic Sexual Orientation from the diagnostic manual.2 Removing that term in response to public criticism would be a mistake. Experiencing ongoing sexual attractions to prepubescent children is, in essence, a form of sexual orientation, and acknowledging that reality can help to distinguish the mental makeup that is inherent to Pedophilia, from acts of child sexual abuse.

>>8580424

I had replied to you earlier, and am just now getting to this message. I think it needs to made clear, If it wasnt already, that abuse i.e rape is very different from consent. If you are okay with it would you be able to describe your abuse because what I propose when i say consent is not a simple yes or no as it relates to children but actually taking the time to educate about the pitfalls of sex them and taking the 'L' if they decide not to take part after being given sufficent knowledge. Like a parent giving their child "the talk" as they enter puberty.

>>8580437
The anecdotes exist on both sides for example one of the women in the recent slew of teacher having sex with their student had evidence that the boy (13) came unto her quite aggressively and she succumbed. Do you also consider this abuse?

>>8580480

Not the person you were replying to but Homosexuality was LITERALLY called homophillia in the past and the dsm of today treats pedophillia as a sexual orientation. Read it some time.

>>8580495
The thing we have to ask ourselves is, are power imbalances bad? Not really, the problem is that they have a large potential for abuse. Your workplace doesn't ban you from having sex with you supervisor because sex is bad but because that imbalance might be used to "force" sex or the sex might be used as leverage to ask for a promotion. Even as a pedophile I did not say that it should be made legal. Where an adult can leave the job a child cannot leave their family for example. If we lived in a utopia where we could be sure that the power imbalances would not be used to abuse then i would be infavour of legalization but children are far too weak and the pedophiles that do not abuse will have to suffer with those that do for the time being. Sex with children is not inherently wrong but it leaves too much room for abuse.

>They DO gain something. You are utterly deluded if you think a child does not perceive the pedophile's own interest in the act.

I have to call you out on this because you are not thinking objectively. In the scenario I outlined the pedophile gained something akin to the happiness a parent feels feeding their child or taking them to Disney world. You feel happy because your children are happy and of course this is not seen as a betrayal of trust. There can be mutually beneficial sexual encounters if you look at it in this way.

>>8580517
Power imbalances are not bad, them being leveraged to force someone to do something they do want to is bad. I had replied to your previous post but i will do it here again. As a pedophile even I can see that the risk of abuse due to the power imbalance present between adult and child is too great to risk and those that would not take advantage of this imbalance will have to suffer with those that would for the sake of the children as we do not live in a utopia where we can be sure that abuses will not take place so it is better to be safe than sorry. My postings might seem contradictory but they are not. The point I am trying to make is that the stigma faced by pedophiles is not logical or warranted and with a critical eye we can see why the status quo should be maintained without the need for any 'vitriol or hate' in the likes of ALL PEDOS SHOULD DIE or other such hyperbole.

>>8580458
>kids don't experience sexual attraction the way adults do

Isn't transgenderism primarily a sexual feeling? Shouldn't it be held to the same standards as sexual consent then? Stop pretending your societal prejudice is in accordance with some kind of logic, because it's not.

>>8577958
at least gays are not freaks

>>8580809
>Isn't transgenderism primarily a sexual feeling?

no, it isn't.
please educate yourself before shitposting here.

File: image.jpg (339KB, 1687x890px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1687x890px

>>8577581

>>8577611
>>8577937
They've been spamming these troll threads with that avatar for days. Like several times when I've looked at the catalogue they've had 3+ of these threads going at once and that's just the ones with the obvious avatar, they may be making more of teh troll threads.

Tranny shit aside it's spamming and avatarfagging both which are against the global rules.

>>8578266
It's probably that same pedo spammer that has been around for awhile which that one anon always calls out from the image data.
Of course, then they just call it a paranoid witchhunt by the evil trannies oppressing poor pedophiles.

>>8582019
>pedo spammer
that straight disease cureanon caraposter is always lurking! lmao

File: 1490039484199.jpg (64KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 720x720px

>>8582059
>tfw you come back to a thread and find all the cureanon posts deleted including multiple where they pretended to be different people and denied samefagging
>>8582519

File: 1489272120472.jpg (123KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1136x640px

>>8582059
Please, spammer admits to being a poor persecuted pedophile more than once. So his claiming persecution is ridiculous when he admits to the crime.

Pedofilth should be killed.

>>8577581
Why are you people even engaging with this? Seriously it's not even up for debate.

File: image.png (124KB, 500x397px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x397px

>>8582753
SO MUCH FOR THE TOLERANT LEFT

>>8582765
Report and Sage the pedophile everyone
Make it so the mods can find and catch this guy once they get back and feed his info to the Feds. Shut down this kid fucker.

>>8582019
>>8582059
>>8582742
>le everyone that hates trannies is le pedo contact the mods

Just fuck off and stop trying to scapegoat innocent people.

>>8582765
As a Muslim I find the first and second couples incredibly offensive.

>>8584854
first and third*

Sorry.

>>8577960
You're really not making this any better slamming pedos. Trannies deserve to be suicidal for for making stupid decisions. That's a fact.

>>8577581
Because transexuals are the appex of sexual insanity in the LGBT.

>>8580343
>I know how I was at 12, I couldn't consent to getting my fucking feet rubbed. Most of the world's population is the same.

>"I couldn't consent to ___ so I think everyone is the same as me!

kys

File: disgust.jpg (5KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 100x100px

>>8584963
>trannies make stupid decisions
>being attracted to literal fucking children
wow dude you shure showed those transes


[spoiler] also who went into game settings and changed the spot the pedo difficulty setting to beginner? [/spoiler}

File: suzuka.jpg (266KB, 697x885px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 697x885px

>>8578109
>is precisely what makes children appealing to them.
those are edgy retards for which pedophilia is nothing more then a fetish.

anyway
pedosexual acceptance is a good thing, but only so far that loli porn and sex dolls will be legal.
though im sure the slippery slope will go further then that.

>>8581790
>at least gays are not freaks

No, you're just pets for cis women.

File: Pride-Flag.jpg (31KB, 940x540px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 940x540px

Race also gets to be a part of LGBTQI now.

>>8577581
You know what you should just replace the T on LGBT. LGBP makes more sense than LGBT. That way us trannies don't have to be lumped in with a bunch of faggots.

>>8580548
"Educating" children on sex with the intention of manipulating them into having sex with you is CLASSIC GROOMING you speck of cow dung.

And no, I'm not handing you fap material.

> Not really, the problem is that they have a large potential for abuse.
LITERALLY THE POINT I'VE MADE THE WHOLE THREAD, kys. kys. kys.

> the pedophile gained something akin to the happiness a parent feels feeding their child
This is so fucking delusional that I literally stopped reading in the middle of that sentence.
Neck yourself. Nobody wants you alive. Only anti-contact pedos with normal human empathy should live - they're okay people, they just pulled a short straw.

You're not an okay person, you want to justify rape.

Do it, faggot.

>>8580809
>Isn't transgenderism primarily a sexual feeling?

It isn't sexual, period.

How are you this fucking dumb.

>>8580360
>Child is old enough to consider the risks of STDs, Pregnancies, and can gauge human interaction enough to reasonably know if they are being manipulated or groomed.

Kill. Your. Self. Pedro-enabling scum.

>>8582781
It's not illegal to be a pedophile. It's illegal to molest kids or possess child porn (although fictionalized child porn is a legal grey area at least in the US)

>>8586533
most people are too stupid and thoughtless to do any of that no matter how old they are.

>>8586451
>>8577581

LGBP does not make sense. And neither does LGBTP.

The point of the LGBT movement isn't to say "it's OK to feel these attractions / dysphoria." If that's all it was, it would be "MSM attraction" and related.

The point of the LGBT movement is to say "it's OK to act on your attractions / dysphoria."

It is NOT OK for pedophiles to act. So, no, they can't be part of the LGBT acronym even if they are technically a minority.

>>8580548
What are you trying to say? That maybe he consented but didn't realize it?
>would you be able to describe your abuse
I see other pedophiles say this a lot in these debates. There's plenty of case studies out there in the world for you to read already analyzed by actual psychologists and whatnot.

>>8577581
We aren't antagonistic, we're defensive against gay men who don't care about anyone else and only care about their marriages and then turn into self loathing sellout cucks like milo yialappalooopieyogo

Oh pedos are fucking gross too.

>>8580399
>Women
>Facing legal consequences for their actions
Oh you

>>8587842
Our legal system or the players in it do have some double standards, but considering she did it to almost every kid on the block - if everyone reported, the bias in our legal system isn't that strong, she would be locked up *somewhere*.
That said, the reporting and successful prosecuting of childhood sexual abuse in general is depressing. Literally anyone could be a pedo.

>>8588874
>the bias in our legal system isn't that strong
Hahaha.

>>8588901
She WOULD see time, even if it would be less than a boy her age would receive.
Even though people have a double standard against male victims, especially in juvenile on minor offenses, there are SO MANY "Romeo & Juliet" style apologists out there.

ok, your hatred toward trannies notwithstanding, are you actually sticking up for pedophiles? ó︵ò

>>8588949
>She WOULD see time
[citation needed]

>>8589420
Fine, I don't have numbers. But, you see women get charged for sex offenses (when there's proof). Things also change since she's a juvenile and we don't know her exact age. Depending on how young she was at the time (10? 12? 15?) it would change on how she was treated. There's also the fact that young offenders are likely to have been victims themselves.

We're not going to leave this discussion with the same opinion. And I'm already biased against this argument in general because sex offenses go UNREPORTED and UNCONVICTED all the time, for both male and female offenders.

>>8589649
Did you know that when a man is violently abused by his wife, when he phones the police, he is more likely to be arrested than she is? And more likely to be charged? And more likely to be convicted than the actual criminal?

Tell me again how "the bias in our legal system isn't that strong"

File: image.png (680KB, 438x1352px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 438x1352px

>>8589649
>female """pedos"""

>>8589671
ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THAT? NO. We are talking about juvenile on minor sexual abuse.

>>8589790
>the bias in our legal system isn't that strong

>>8589834
I wasn't saying it was nonexistent, I was saying that in case like >>8580399, the bias would not be strong enough for a female offender to see zero time.

>>8589694
The article you linked is especially relevant, since it it started as juvenile-on-minor sexual abuse (maybe it's not considered that in the UK). Quotes below:

From article (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/british-mom-jailed-sex-8-year-old-article-1.1726526):
>Morris, now 21, started abusing the youngster when she was just 16 — and went on to sleep with him more than 50 times in two years, according to the Ledbury Reporter.

From the Ledbury Reporter (http://www.ledburyreporter.co.uk/news/11086362.Herefordshire_woman_jailed_for_sex_with_eight_year_old_boy/)
>Morris, whose address on the court system was recorded as Lyde, will serve two years each for the three counts to be served concurrently.
>"Therefore my sentence is one of two years. You will serve 12 months in prison before being released on licence."
>She was also made subject of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order, banning her from contact with a child under 16 without permission of a parent, and ordered to sign on the Sexual Offenders Register for 10 years.

>>8589876
And I'm saying that's your unrealistic just world wishful thinking.

>>8589903
I don't think it's a just world, I'd think that would be obvious by my >>8589649
And I'm not claiming the sentencing would be sufficient or seem fair. I'm saying that there wouldn't be zero recourse/consequence.
Even in linked >>8589694 that shows a woman getting off with just 1 year jailtime followed by 1 year probation, she's still on the UK equivalent of a sex offender registry (for the next 10 years - not sure on standards in the UK for this sort of thing).

>>8589939
Female sex offenders arent treated harshly like male sex offenders are though

>>8589953
Yes. And my claim was that they aren't treated so favorably that they have 0 consequence.
Even if the consequence feels insufficient.
And also that this world is horrible and so many offenders go unaccused or, if accused, unconvicted because it's been too long that there's no more evidence because of the statute of limitations.

>>8589953
[citation needed]

>>8590001
It's a human thing.
You see a man who's labeled as a sex offender you think he's a kidfucker.
You see a woman who's labeled a sex offender you think she just did something stupid like public flashing.
Even seeing a single male in a public place where children are around, most people dont think "parent" they think pedophile

>>8589970
>my claim was that they aren't treated so favorably that they have 0 consequence.
Then look around more.

>>8590021
>projecting this hard

most "sex offenders" were charged for pissing in public.

>>8590336
>Projecting
Do you even know what that term means?
>Most sex offenders are charged with pissing
Yeah no shit, but people are more likely to assume the male is the evil child rapist and the woman pissed in public

I hate the retards in this board

>>8590747
projecting means your are assuming that other people share your biases, which is what you are doing.
not everyone thinks sex offenders are kidfucker/child rapists as you assert.
that is you projecting your thoughts onto "everybody"

>>8577581
How is this still up?

>>8581790
only in the last couple years due to shilling from jews and fat straight women

homosexuals have ALWAYS been seen as freaks

>>8590905
because truth

>>8591010
Then why do Blanchard threads get deleted?

>>8580809
It's not though. It's not. You ought to try an honest conversation with a transperson.

>>8582765
If that's the price of not supporting pedophilia then I toast to that and the collapse of "the tolerant Left."

>>8591442
And you ought to try a conversation with a pedosexual before you call for their death online.

>>8582765
>muh fear mongering
why are only the pedos and bestialityfags fucking while the rest are holding hands

>>8590794
Not that anon, but it's a well known fact that, at least in the US, strangers are assumed to be pedophiles by default if they're men. The fear mongering is that strong.

For example, most airlines have a rule that a man isn't allowed to sit next to a lone child unless they're related.

>>8584816
The op is literally pro-pedo.
It's right there at the top of the thread for anyone to see. So I really don't know who you're trying to fool with this deflection that it's all a paranoid conspiracy against a pro-pedo boogeyman that doesn't exist.

Either you must have some literal mental deficiency or you're just so desperate for attention that you'll post the most obvious bait for any (you)s you can get, I'm not sure which is sadder.

Lol, you sick dirty f^ck.

>>8577958
Keep preaching about your woes cister.

>>8591867
Thanks feminism!

>>8591617
>insult trannies
>WHY WONT U TOLERATE US

pedofags every time

not only are you CURSED on this earth with a disorder that makes you molest children you can't convince a wet fly to buzz LOL

stay in hell.

File: 1353019334761.png (188KB, 434x600px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 434x600px

>>8593200
>Believing literal interpretations

>>8593200
It's on topic of the discussion, but hell isn't even really clearly defined in the bible. Unless I'm mistaken.

Lol this thread is still up. Can I get a (you) sisterposter?

>>8577581
Pedophiles are subhuman trash that should be killed on sight. They destroy the lives of children, claiming to love them, but due to their fixed age preference, they can basically only burn through raping child after child for the rest of their lives. They're monsters that should be put down.

>>8582007
>Avatar fagging gets you banned.
What about Cara, fiona and carth then?

>>8580514
Pretty sure we all disagree with that. Therapy or suicide are the only options. I was actually defending pedos the other day because the odds were never in their favor fetish-wise but now I see how skewed your logic is to get what you want instead of getting help to prevent child molestation. Please please pleeease kill yourself. from the bottom of my heart and as honest as I can possibly be, do whatever it takes to end your life asap. Your kind are actual trash.