>Bi cis guy who loves a lot of kinks, switch also >one

>>8327609
A G P
G
P

>>8327632
What does this mean again?

>>8327632
Came into this thread to post this.

>>8327609

Are the men in your fantasies faceless? Do you like them specifically treating you like a woman? Would you still be interested in sex with a man if you had to be the masculine top?

>>8327632

Definitely.

>>8327653

Autogynephilia. Attraction to oneself as a woman.

>>8327653
It means you're a tranny. Congratulations.

>>8327676
What does that last question have to do with anything

>>8327676
She said didn't actually say her fantasies involved men. Many AGPs start off imagining a woman in the man's role.

>>8327688

A cis bisexual male should be able to top easily even if his preference is bottoming. A bisexual tranny is unlikely to be fine with taking on a male set of behaviors and topping.

>>8327697

What kind of person identifies as bisexual without having at least fantasized about being with a man (besides an in-denial lesbian)?

>>8327707
I missed the bi bit.

>>8327712

I understand that, you could easily have seen it as "be."

File: 18582560_1327688600641425_9206792133268986050_n.jpg (41KB, 734x960px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 734x960px

>>8327676
OP Here

Would serve man or woman, and not really faceless, like if I could put a face to them I would

And yeah about the treating part.. sissies and cross-dressing and all that jazz, got into a few months back and it's like my top 3 fetishes now.

>>8327676
FUCK OFF

>>8327707
I really, really, really dislike topping, as in I can't do it.

>>8327774
oops the fuck off bit was meant for >>8327686
I'M NOT TRANS

>>8327774

How can you be a switch if you don't like topping? What makes you say you're cis and not trans?

>>8327789
Oh I mean switch as in dom and sub, as you can be either. I don't correlate dom = top and sub = bottom, you can be dom and still be bottom (which i've done plenty before)

Cause I know i'm a male and cannot scientifically become a female. Even if I wanted to be, I couldn't, so there's not point. I can still dress up and be called one etc for sexual reasons but that doesn't actually make me one.

>>8327774
>Would serve man or woman, and not really faceless, like if I could put a face to them I would
But you don't imagine men with faces by default like you do with women, right? Like, you might have a photo you imagine when you think of a woman but not for a man?

>>8327819
That's probably true, I have an image in mind but no one specific. I focus more on the body and the cock then I do their face, probably. What's it mean?

>>8327856
It's because the AGP orientation is an inverted straight male orientation. What a regular man's orientation wants from a woman, yours wants from you. The man in AGP fantasies is in the place of themselves in regular men's fantasies. He isn't the focus of the fantasy and is basically a stand in for the man to project himself onto, but in your case you project onto the woman instead, leaving him blank.

>>8327609
Are trans women disproportionately switches? I'm a trans switch...

>>8327801

>Cause I know i'm a male and cannot scientifically become a female. Even if I wanted to be, I couldn't, so there's not point. I can still dress up and be called one etc for sexual reasons but that doesn't actually make me one.

So as a hypothetical, if you could change your name to a woman's, dress as a woman in public, participate in activities exclusive to women, and raise children as their mother, but people still said that you are fundamentally a man, would you prefer that?

>>8328049
Nah, I like being a man , but i'll do a run down of these

>change your name to a woman's
I like my name so no, but I could do either, it wouldn't really bother me much

>dress as a woman in public
hmm well I like 'women's' clothes so this one is probably true, skirts and crop tops and thongs etc, but I don't think dressing in women's clothes make you a woman (not genderfluid don't worry lol)

>participate in activities exclusive to women
What activities are exclusive to women, that men couldn't do also?

>and raise children as their mother
I can't give birth to kids so i'm not their mother, nor would I raise them like all crossdress-y because that doesn't set a very good example

>but people still said that you are fundamentally a man, would you prefer that?

I don't know. I don't mean to come at you as an insult or anything, just thought i'd break all these things down to you. Doing stereotypical 'female' things is a big turn on but that's only sexual, I don't see it as having anything to do with my identity.

>>8327707
Not OP but I'd be fine topping a trap but not anything else.

>>8327609
I'm surprised there's another bi cis guy with this ultra-specific fetish. Kindred spirits, anon. Welcome to this suffering.

>>8327609
it's a fucking fantasy, moron. having a snuff fetish wouldn't make you a murderer, because you have to actually DO something to be called that. if you're not transitioning and it is, as you stated, a fantasy, then no, you aren't trans. you're just a disgusting autogynephiliac.

>>8330040
This seems fine.