>tfw only attracted to women but think the male form is vastly superior and more aesthetic
I'm not homo right
>>8199137
your homo, right?
>pretty sure ur homo
>>8199137
no
it's not gay. men are just better.
>>8199137
No you're not.
>>8199137
the female form aesthetic is vastly superior, it's the only one that can look good naturally without too much work
male form only looks good with a very specific diet and rigorous training. even then most still end up looking disproportionate because it's much harder to build leg muscles (the jokes about skipping leg day exist for a reason)
>>8199137
Ew he doesn't even have a tan.
You're not gay you'd post a much hotter guy.
With a tan
>>8201141
i wish i had the female aesthetic..
>the jokes about skipping leg day exist for a reason
explain
>>8201156
>complains about his lack of tan
>not about the fact he shaves
>>8201192
it's easier to develop upper body muscles than lower body muscles, calf muscles in particular are a pain in the ass to build
most dudebros end up looking like pic related, great upper body, but awful lower body. ideal female bodies are much more proportional and harmonious
>>8201141
Ugh why are high waisted shorts popular. They're absolute shit. They look like diapers.
>>8201311
Lel this meme
Legs aren't any harder to develop than any other muscle, it's just that no one wants to do squats.
>>8201275
not even close my friend, i would say arnold at his peak had the best male body ever, however as impressive as it looks, his body isn't as pleasant to the eyes as this girl's body >>8201141
also she surely didn't work nowhere near as hard as him to get her body. female aesthetics = more attractive, better and easier to maintain; period
>>8201141
The female form only looks good because us as humans have it wired in our brains to find it attractive. In actuality it's like comparing the body of a bull to the body of a cow.
>>8201373
Idk I think that's peak performance/athletic body but not necessarily the most attractive. Most people find men who are a little less hueg more attractive.
The fact remains that women are FAAAAKKKEEEEEEE as fuck!
And seeing as how there are many of straight people about it appears as if most of the men don't mind chubby/average builds. However, their are a number of men who like their women fit and with women being so damn lazy......
>>8201141
>even then most still end up looking disproportionate because it's much harder to build leg muscles
Not even. That's just called being dumb and lazy. All they have to do is work them just as they would their upper bodies and it will devolpe. They think people don't notice their legs and or they just simply don't care and skip it. It isn't any harder than the upper body
Nevertheless, this shit just comes down to your personal attractions. I'm going to go with the dudes simply because of the gay. And also the fact that men are natural. Besides some shaving and lotion what you see if generally what you get.
>>8199137
OP don't listen to these homos, if you prefer the male form to the female form, you're a fucking queer.
>>8201387
The female form has to a large degree evolved by sexual selection, whereas the male form has evolved for dominating other males. This means that the female form is inherently more attractive (which is also why so many women are semi-bisexual) whereas the male form is inherently more battle-ready.
>>8202270
Good Lord why are Asians so disgusting
>>8202270
>>8202281
This.
>>8202388
Don't be so prejudiced, anon.
>>8201373
>aesthetics = more attractive
Again, false. Arnold isn't even that good looking in the pic you posted and he still looks better than >>8201141
>better and easier to maintain
You're just being lazy fuck.
>>8201254
Why would him shaving be a problem?
Body hair is gross.
Plz go no1 likes bears.
>>8201324
>calf muscles in particular are a pain in the ass to build
>have huge calf muscles
>can't fucking get rid of them