If you HAD to choose a letter from qia+ to be added to lgbt which

>>8048767
Q because it would make people argue even more over what it stands for.

>>8048767
C, for cisgender folks.

>>8048809
I guess asexual because it has the lowest amount of special snowflakes, but I find it to be a little like adding atheism to a list of religions. Then again, adding T to LGB is like putting an apple on a list of vegetables.

>>8048823
I honestly don't even count T as a letter there. It's not a sexuality like LGB, it's a gender.

If a transwoman, she's just a woman.
If a trans man, he's just a man.
Both born with birth defects that can be corrected with surgery. That's how I see it anyway.

Probably A. That's asexual, right? There are so many extra letters tagged on sometimes. Anyway, I see it like this: Attracted to the opposite gender only is the norm. Attracted to the same gender exclusively and attracted to everyone(not getting into preferences between genders/bi/pan complicated shit) are minorities, and are included. The only other option, not being attracted to anyone, isn't, but is also a sexual orientation minority.

Really, replacing the T with A makes more sense from a "sexual orientation only" standpoint. Adding A would basically make it "everything other than straight". Separating sexual orientation from gender identity would clear up a lot of common confusion straight/cis people have about this stuff too, IMO.

>>8048854
I'm T and agree 100%, but I also like being included ((at least on this board) because there's more people to talk to.

>>8048860
>Probably A. That's asexual, right?
A is autogynephilia.

>Really, replacing the T with A makes more sense from a "sexual orientation only" standpoint.
Agreed.

>>8048873
A is not AGP. AGP falls under T.

>>8048860
I'm op, and yes a is asexual, don't listen to this faggot >>8048873

>>8048868
I'm a Bi male and I posted >>8048854

I think personally it's what most Trans people want anyway, they just want to be normal guys/girls. So that's how I see them, it's the only decent thing to do. I wouldn't like it if someone thought I was the opposite gender cause of a birth defect which is out of my control, so why should I do that to someone else?


I guess it's fine for talking to people sure, but i mean, it should be removed from LGB because it's not a sexuality. Simply a matter of definitions here is all.

>>8048888
Not all AGPs are T and T is out anyway if we take the logical sexual orientations only standpoint.

>>8048893
>asexuality
>an orientation

>>8048767
A for asexual. If only to support the argument that LGBT advocacy isn't just about people that want to have sex.

>>8048950
What are asexual issues besides 'notice me'?

>>8048974
Wanting to get aroused/get off.
Being pestered for sex/struggling to find sexless relationships.

>>8048767

It would be LGB if I had any say in it, and not a damn thing else

>>8049006
C U C K
U
C
K

>>8048974
Awkward family Thanksgivings with constant "when will you get a girl/boyfriend" questions? I don't know. I'm not asexual. But they're the only other combination that isn't included in the current set of letters. It's not a "people with oppression/issues" list as much as it is an "everything other than straight" list that could be complete and simple by just switching the T for an A.

Eh, it just kind of bugs the completionist/perfectionist in me the more I think about it, honestly. LGBT as it is just seems kind of illogical and incomplete.

>>8048986
Isn't it more self oppressive not getting yourself off if you want to or do you believe your 'sexuality' doesn't allow exploring how to do that?

>>8049015
Seems like more of a family issue. AGP is a better fit than the absence of sexuality but I don't think either are facing real issues besides personal ones.

>>8049046
>Isn't it more self oppressive not getting yourself off if you want to
I meant being unable to get aroused.

>>8049046
>AGP is a better fit than the absence of sexuality
But it's just T or a fetish.

>>8049078
hence why I said they're both personal and don't fit well. anyone can be agp and fetish or not it can be a healthy outlet. society is pushing people to hate themselves too much already. how could you hate someone for being agp unless you're jealous

>>8049106
>how could you hate someone for being agp unless you're jealous
I wonder if people can get jealous of AGP...

File: laughing_owls_13.jpg (28KB, 700x466px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 700x466px

>>8048829

>asexual

>lowest amount of special snowflakes

Nigger you serious?