Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: blaire white corset looking bra.png (250KB, 486x486px) Image search:
[Google]
250KB, 486x486px
https://thingofthings.wordpress.com/category/itt/
there is currently an 'intellectual turing test' (in which you have to figure out if someone claiming a specific political viewpoint actually agrees or disagrees with it) running in which the viewpoints are 'transsexualism is caused by gender identity and blanchard was wrong' or 'transsexualism is hsts/a*p and blanchard was right'
the submissions are now being published and people have to vote on which group the writer is part of, and declare which one they themselves are
there aren't many voters (and especially few blanchardian voters) and it works better when there are more people, so /tttt/ should share their perspective
>>
I'm not sure if I understand this completely--isn't it obvious what their actual views are because they answer different questions based on which perspective they're trying to argue?
Also I feel like the majority of those questions could easily be answered the same way by someone who believes in innate gender identity and someone who doesn't.
>>
>>7873654
people send in two submissions, one for identity and one for blanchard, and tell the person running the test what their real opinion is
test runner publishes all the identity answers and then all the blanchard answers, without mentioning which one the writer actually believes
voters have to vote on if it's legit or not
>>
>>7873674
Oh, I guess I misread wherever they said they send in one for both sides.
Did you submit anything, blanchardanon-kun?
>>
>>7873703
i did, though neither have been published yet
>>
>>7873719
why don't you get a blog?
>>
>>7873730
i've been strongly considering it, and i do in fact have an empty page that may at some point be a blog
i have a couple post ideas in mind
i haven't written anything yet though
>>
Blaire White is an ugly androgynous man who wants all other trannies to be ugly hons.
>>
>>7873753
link it
>>
>>7873753
I'd read your blog anon
>>
>>7873719
wtf, you can't say that! unless you're lying and your gi has been published.
>>
>>7873763
Haven't seen a finer example of projection on this site.
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1