are they "genderfluid" because they can't see

>>7431966

joke's on you since you correctly gendered them while making fun of their gender identity

>>7432621
not all genderfluid use the same pronouns, and even then, it can change depending on if they feel like boy or a girl or some non-binary identity

>>7432634

you can find their info with a google search

>>7431966
>are they "genderfluid" because they can't see their genitals and forgot which one it was?
Not exactly a "genderfluid" which only exist in animal kingdom like snail whom can produce sperm and eggs within their body NATURALLY without plastic/fake surgery. In human, nah. They're just like pieces of turd from diarrhea. That's the best explanation.

Stop normalizing "they"

>>7431966

Jesus Christ, look at those stretch marks

What a disgusting piece of shit

>>7432857
i was talking about all "genderfluid", with OP pic to emphasize the average physical appearance of these creatures

>>7432857

Literally no reason not to.

t. someone who uses "literally" figuratively.

>>7432621
They isn't a gender. It may be acceptable in this case.

>>7432857

Shakespeare used it, so anyone else can use it. It's acceptable to use with the pronoun one, meaning that it can be used with individuals of unknown gender. There's no reason it can't be used with people of a known gender.

In any case, Oxford says it's okay, so it's okay. And before you bitch about them fucking up the term literally, we aren't the first generation to fuck with that word. Mark Twain beat us to the punch.

>>7431966
i think it's because their body can be more accurately modeled as a fluid than a solid

>>7433029

It's a figure of speech meaning you used their correct pronoun.