What do you guys think of gay for pay porn stars? Do you think

>>6937909
You'd have to be a least a little gay to be open to being fucked and especially on camera. I say bluff or repressed

>>6937909
Think about it like this (if you're gay).
Would you go straight for pay?

(If you're bi, just replace "straight" with "zoo (in a country where that's perfectly legal)").

>>6937993
I don't see gay porn stars doing straight for pay. I doubt they would want anything to do with a woman. My guess is that these "gay for pay" actors are some what gay.

>>6937909
the gay for pay actors are typically tops though, aren't they? I would think it's easier for them to shoot the scene because they won't cum as quickly.

>>6937909
Of course they are gay/bi. The whole gay for pay thing is just a way to market the videos to degenerate gay guys who get off on the idea of fucking straight guys. It's just like how mother/daughter or whatever incest themed porn is actually never really incest. It's just a narrative they sell to get you interested

>>6937995
Exactly.
Gay porn stars don't go straight for pay and straight porn stars don't actually go gay for pay. There just happens to be a niche market of gay guys who get off to the idea of a heterosexual fucking them.

>>6938009
>Gay porn stars don't go straight for pay

Because no one is interested in that fantasy. I bet that for the right money you could get that.

File: d98.jpg (8KB, 220x276px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 220x276px

>>6937995
>>6938009
>>6938022
...
No, it's because there's no shortage of straight people.

I was delighted when I happened to watch a vid with Eddie Stone and James Oak (aka Michael Vegas) in it. Eddie is gay, James gay for pay (he has lots of straight porn around), but it was James who seemed to be more into it, he even licked and swallowed cum while Eddie was visibly disgusted with it and only pretended he was kissing James.

>>6937993
>Would you go straight for pay?
Yeah but that's different because there isn't the same stigma for doing straight porn as there is for gay porn, especially if you're the bottom

>>6938022
See
>>6938043

Also there are tons of women who like to fuck gay guys cause they get off on the idea that they "turned him straight" just like gays do for straights that "expirament"

>>6937993
Ew no
Vaginas are gross

>>6938043
>No, it's because there's no shortage of straight people.

Right, but in that case you wouldn't mention that you are hiring straight actors, if it wasn't a thing.

>>6938180
>Also there are tons of women who like to fuck gay guys cause they get off on the idea that they "turned him straight" just like gays do for straights that "expirament"

But apparently there is no market for "straight for pay", otherwise you would have porn on that subject.

>>6938279
>But apparently there is no market for "straight for pay", otherwise you would have porn on that subjec
I agree, it's a fetish but apparently not strong enough of one to result in porn production. Maybe because women don't consume porn as much as men or maybe because it's something that's more fun in the act than it is to watch.