So the HRC just put out a trans safe sex guide. What does /lgbt/ think about this? [spoiler]Especially lesgen[/spoiler]
>>6887959
Unfortunately we at lesgen are too busy abusing our gf's and molesting 12 yo girls to comment.
>>6887959
Wow wtf? Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?
>>6888008
Its on their site: http://www.hrc.org/resources/safer-sex-for-trans-bodies
Here is a pdf: http://hrc-assets.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com//files/assets/resources/Trans_Safer_Sex_Guide_FINAL.pdf
>>6887959
>"strapless"
my fucking sides
>be babby dyke
>conservative family/friends: dick isn't that bad, just like, you gotta find that special one attached to the right person pls don't just date women
>jetpack out to queer area
>queer family/friends: dick isn't that bad, just like, you gotta find that special one attached to the right person pls don't just date cis women
8/8 m8 jimmies rustled erry time
I'm MtF and think this "strapless" thing is bullshit. Calling a post op neo-vagina a vagina (without the neo part) is just a convenient thing to do. Besides that, "strapless" is the worst thing you could call a dick since no real transsexual woman wants to penetrate someone like a man would. That's disgusting. I personally refer to mine as "the problem" or "it," and in context my girlfriend understands what I mean. The "front hole" thing sounds fine, though. I know a FtM who calls his a "bro hole."
>>6888256
I don't think its fair to call a natural a vagina a "front hole" and a neo-vagina just a vagina. The definition of vagina makes no mention of natural vaginas and regulating natural vaginas to "front holes" draws a parallel to the misogynistic tendency of some transpersons to refer to cis-woman as "fish" and not taking into consideration the actual complex and various purposes of the vagina, which cannot be replicated through surgery. and But I do agree with your sentiment on "strapless".
>>6888341
"Front hole" presumably covers both natural vaginas and neo-vaginas.
>>6888705
Hmm hadn't seen it that way. The wording could be better then.
>>6887959
>can't say penis
>can say vagina
that's some cringy shit what are they 12 year old boys? oh right it's liberal human "rights" campaign
>>6888341
you call a natural vagina a vagina too, but doing that makes some trans men dysphoric, so they use front hole in reference to themselves. it's not misogynistic if you just use it for guys. i have never seen anyone use front hole for a cis woman or a trans woman with a neovagina.
personally, though, i don't see what the big deal is about calling genitals what they are. it's just an organ like any other.
>>6888749
why can you say dicks though
>>6888764
not saying you can't but when an organization is putting out a guide on safe sex they should be able to use the accepted medical term of penis
>genitals
TRIGGERED