I'm a dude and I'm only sexually attracted to men and

So you're a common bifag. Don't explain yourself, what would even be the point? The porn you like is nothing to come out over, nobody cares or wants to know.

Do what makes you happy

You have no idea how common you are

>>6837460
>I'm bi but I don't want to date queer because of the influence of social pressures, and I share the common American fixation with labeling all things
If you want to fuck a dude, fuck a dude. What do you mean with this "what do?" shit. Labels are meant to describe your sexuality, not vice-versa.

>>6837460
>I'm only sexually attracted to men and transexuals(MtF)
>also I'm romantically and sexually attracted to women as well
Do i really have to point out the contradiction here?

File: bimaster.png (326KB, 1000x625px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1000x625px

>>6838816
i was curious about this also

>>6838816
I think he means that men and women both sexually stimulate his body but he's only looking to be in a romantic relationship with women.

Shame though, OP
Mens are much better romantic lovers

>>6838816
>>6838864
You have misinterpreted OP's post as saying "I'm sexually attracted only to men and..."

OP obviously could've phrased it better (though his grammar is correct; yours is not), but he is saying that his attraction to men and trans people is only sexual, and not potentially romantic.

>>6838891
grammer doesn't matter one bit if you cannot express yourself.
>Obviouly needed better phrasing.

Btw fuck grammar and anyone who correct grammar on 4chan; this shit aint a scientific journal
>Your dumb.
inb4 "you're or you are"

>>6838816
It's very clumsy phrasing (though technically correct, grammatically speaking), but what he meant was "[only sexually attracted (i.e. not romantically attracted)] [to men]", NOT "[only] [sexually attracted to men (i.e. not to women)]"

>>6838925
>grammer doesn't matter one bit if you cannot express yourself.
Great post, junior. Grammar is important, because if you read OPs post literally, it is not ambiguous. Did I police anyone or did I simply discuss this? You may not write scientific journals, but some of us do, and the world at large should have the capacity to read them. Start putting some value in your education.

File: 1444522361805.jpg (22KB, 408x352px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 408x352px

>romantically attracted to women
>sexually attracted to men

>>6845773
Same here, but back to front. I get turned on by women more, but I literally don't know what to do with women. But with guys it's like... feels more natural?

>>6845773
fuck this gay Earth, I had a crush on a woman who literally couldn't get my penis up

why is this allowed?