Lgbt survery time! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dig it_r

File: IMG_20160218_181850.jpg (395KB, 734x979px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 734x979px

Bi cismale here, the article predicts lower digit ratio but mine seems to be high.

>>5746518
My ratio is 0.96 and I'm a tranny, so I guess?

>>5746518

Bi MtF tranny, ratio of 1:1-on both hands.

Don't know the measurement, but I definitely have a longer ring finger and I'm ftm, so, reflects it pretty nicely.

File: 20160218_163937.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

Straight mtf here, my ratio is just over 1, I think. Make sense since the wiki says the higher the ratio, the more feminine you are and the more you like masculine men.

It looks like my ring finger is slightly longer than my index but when I actually measure them out they seem to be 1:1 due to my index finger's bottom crease being kinda low.

Mtf, biscum here

>>5746588
Jesus dude, whats up with your hand

You've got cancer on your middle and ring finger.

>>5746518
Mine are basically 1:1, though the index finger 'looks' slightly shorter because the joint is further down. Index finger might be a quarter of a cm more.

I'm generally bi, but post-transition I lean toward men.

0.9625

Bi MtF, so I guess it's an OK prediction?

>>5746518
.94 MtF 'lesbian'

0.867 Lesbian here. Yeah, I guess so.

Also, later in the article it says "Masculinized handwriting in females". I don't know how often the teacher was like "no name on this paper... probably a boys" back in school

Homomale, 2D:4D is 1.014.
Sexual orientation and taste in men correlates positively, but no correlation (positive or negative) seen in personality or physical characteristics.

File: image.jpg (65KB, 590x590px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 590x590px

>>5746518
1.05, femboy/"mtf in denial"

File: 1455908454823165330245.jpg (529KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 2048x1152px

>>5746518
I don't entirely understand.
mtf, gay. What does this mean lmao

File: 1280px-Digit_ratio_visualization_according_to_data_from_Bailey_and_Hurd,_2005.png (81KB, 1280x590px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1280x590px

>>5750415
Oh shit nigger, thats a real low ratio. The longer your pointer finger is in relation to your ring finger, the more estrogen you received in the womb.
Typically trans women have ratios comparable to regular women because they both got a lot of estrogen in the womb.

FtA, 1:1
Huh. Neat.

File: 2016-02-20 14.23.58.png (200KB, 320x480px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 320x480px

>>5755899
Forgot picture :p

>>5746518
MtF, mostly lesbian and they are the exact same length.My shoulders and hips are also the same width and I constantly get confused with a FTM friend of mine. We'll see how it goes when I have boobs.

>>5746588
You're doing it backwards. The ratio is ring finger length / index finger length, so you have a really low ratio.

>>5757070
So it looks like this is right on the money, except I am an alcoholic and have addiction problems.I do have depression, anxiety, ptsd, was effeminate and nerdy as a kid, and am trans.

0.97, FtM biscum
I'm exactly average for someone born female, but aside from that, ehh

.965 MtF in denial.

>The meta-analysis concluded that there are no significant sexual orientation differences in digit ratio exist in men.
So... yes?
I have a high ratio, looks like it to me.

>>5757097
But it says 2D/4D, where 2D is index and 4D is ring.

so if fingers are same length, what do that mean?