Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: socrates.jpg (343KB, 1600x913px) Image search:
[Google]
343KB, 1600x913px
>The ancient Greeks did not conceive of sexual orientation as a social identifier as modern Western societies have done. Greek society did not distinguish sexual desire or behavior by the gender of the participants, but rather by the role that each participant played in the sex act, that of active penetrator or passive penetrated.
>This active/passive polarization corresponded with dominant and submissive social roles: the active (penetrative) role was associated with masculinity, higher social status, and adulthood, while the passive role was associated with femininity, lower social status, and youth.[6]
>2016 AD
>being a fuckboy
>>
A bisexuals wet dream.
>>
>>5567287
Source or it didn't happen
>>
>>5567333
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/homosexuality/
From Stanford
> The central distinction in ancient Greek sexual relations was between taking an active or insertive role, versus a passive or penetrated one. The passive role was acceptable only for inferiors, such as women, slaves, or male youths who were not yet citizens.
>>
File: 5a4f22d9be0b0c090dafd3c6e60171a4.jpg (17KB, 236x387px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 236x387px
>tfw no qt erastes
>>
>>5567287
bottoms have more fun
>>
>>5567287
And then they got their ass handed to them. Guess that makes the greeks all fuccbois
>>
>>5567429
The Romans had the same view on sexuality Greek slave boys were literally patrician tier.
>>
>>5567375
Thank you based anon
>>
>>5567287
im a fuccboi looking dude but dominant. I honestly cant see the pleasure of getting fucked anally, dick stimulation is the standard for a reason.
>>
>>5567287
>taking your history lessons from books written by Catholics
>>
>>5567287
hot desu
>>
>>5567287
>Not being a fuckboy who dominates other fuckboys
Ur missing out...
>>
File: midnighter 2.jpg (89KB, 639x681px) Image search:
[Google]
89KB, 639x681px
>>5567287
What this anon said, it might be fine and dandy for biscum, but for gay men, specially versatiles it's absolutely useless AND retarded.
>>
>>5568811
Yeah, because it shows that you're a bunch of effeminate faggot bottoms.
>>
File: 1441112980328.gif (635KB, 396x297px) Image search:
[Google]
635KB, 396x297px
>>5568867
It's still better to be a bottom than a bisexual coward.
>>
>>5568775
That kinda looks like Moot.
>>
I'm jerking off to this
Thread posts: 18
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5