Is there a point to self-propelled guns today when modern artillery

>>35178367
Dirt cheap compared to anythig else.

>>35178367
counter battery might be much faster than 2 minutes.

>>35178684
They aren't.

File: Archer Artillery System.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

Scoot and shoot

>can be set up and struck within 2 minutes
Can they? I've never heard this before
Anyway, they provide protection against fragments and small arms fire

You can never have too many big guns

Two minutes is too slow.
With CRAM, PGK and firestorm, an emplaned gun can have rounds impacting 25000 meters away in ninty three seconds.
An L119 can be gone in two minutes ten seconds if you have a good crew but an M198 or 777? No way can that be put of battery and moving in less than five.

>>35178367
What's the difference between a self-propelled gun and an artillery piece? Aren't they the same thing?

>>35179102
gun is a type of artillery that shoots straighshy

>>35178367
> can be set up and struck within 2 minutes
Not when they're used against illiterate goat fuckers, ie most wars since WW2

>>35179773
what the fuck are you even trying say

>>35179102
One drives itself.