So I bought 100 rounds of this stuff linked up from a old guy

>is .308 Special less powerful than M2 AP .30-06
Could you really not answer this question your self

>>35060153
>Will being loaded in 7.62 nato take the performance way down?
no. 762 NATO was literally designed to mimic the babyshit 30-06 the M1 Garands required.

>>35060174
Literally asking if the ap aspect will be marginally less where it'd just be worth it the keep the m2 and not pull the bullets. Like not going through ar500 for example.

>>35060221
M2 is ballistically identical to 7.62 NATO. That was the requirement of the round you faggit.

M2 AP isn't even AP as it's the defacto standard that lvl 4 armor is intended to stop.

>>35060237
>AP isn't AP if there was armor developed to stop it
WEW

>>35060237
M2 Ball =/= M2 AP.

>>35060286
Nearly identical velocity. Cry more.

>>35060297
It's 130 FPS faster and a 10% heavier bullet. That's a significant difference. It's like 400 ft/lbs more energy

File: 1474341230816.png (110KB, 356x256px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 356x256px

> paying more than $.20 for surp

File: 1504292944105.gif (2MB, 311x362px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 311x362px

>>35060326
Being wealthy enough couple more bucks isn't diving into my food budget...

>>35060313
It's heavier but the velocity is the same. The difference comes from changes in what distance the "muzzle velocity" was taken at. If you compare the two, they're essentially the same in terms of performance.
Expected:
http://forums.thecmp.org/showthread.php?t=68771

Standard for AP:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/223054.pdf

>>35060326
Where are you finding .30-06 for .20/rd?

>>35060475
He has never bought m2 ap. Or m2 ball for that matter just spouting off

File: 1502823853946.jpg (10KB, 236x243px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 236x243px

>>35060475
1947 or Czechoslovakia

>>35060326
Ohh look, it's a faggot that bought a nugget and two spam cans 10 years ago and hasn't shot it more than once a year.