Convince me to not buy a 20 inch barreled upper receiver so I

File: Snapchat-843014264.jpg (504KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 1080x1920px

It wont cycle with a carbine length buffer you tard

>>34974971

W-why not

>carbine lower
But isn't that just like, any lower? Stock aside. what makes a carbine lower?

>>34974982
Apparently having an adjustable stock that rides over the buffer tube, like the ones in his vidya.

File: even weebs like kektec.jpg (871KB, 1301x1600px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 1301x1600px

>>34975002
Forgot image contribution.

>>34975002

Buffer tube is shorter and buffer is smaller

>>34974957
>Convince me to not buy a 20 inch barreled upper receiver so I can put it on my carbine lower.
Pro tip, I can't.

I worked with some CANs in Afghanistan. I really liked this set up. I have seen this done in the US at some OBC training units so females could properly shoot with body armor. Personally, I would run this set up with an Ace SOCOM stock and a 20" pencil bbl.

>>34974957
Get an A1 or A2 fixed stock fag.

>>34975264

It's form over function

It's not worth putting on my weapon if it doesn't look good

>T. /arg/

Ive done it its front heavy and shifts the balance. if you do decide to do it shell out for a lightweight or pencil profile. a2 sucks.

>>34974957
Just get Vltor A5 buffer kit and you'll be good to go

>>34974971
Nigger you are retarded, mine works just fine. >>34974957
op go for it. Bonus points if you get a fluted barrel...

That pic a c7 anon

File: 169.jpg (471KB, 1726x1303px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1726x1303px

>>34974957
No, I'm not gonna convince you to not buy it. Fucking buy it you shit.

File: 20160402_115411.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>34974957
Here op my first build was a 20" upper with carbine lower. I love this rifle.

That looks stupid as shit. Only leaves and fags think that looks good

>>34974957
Go the other way, 16" upper with rifle length buffer. Shoots like butter.

File: 1430440047_1142eeca40.jpg (119KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 500x333px

>>34974957
You can always tell its Canadian forces because of the goofy fucking optic we put on all of our guns

>>34974957
>Convince

Fuckin just do it.

>>34975586

I was thinking of that and shooting 50-55 grain bullets

>1:9 mustard race

>>34975597
Not a bad optic doe

File: main-qimg-f21b7ffed5917b01d83fbc2e1a4440ea-c.jpg (75KB, 602x452px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 602x452px

>>34975014
>dem freckles
Hawt.

>>34974957
Don the leafs not into lasers?

>>34976845
do*

>>34976845
No we are into bio engineering to turn our soldiers into super soldiers using timbits, double-doubles and maple syrup
It's why JTF2 are so potent

>>34976920
Budget constraints mean that if need to be part of the creme that rises to the top if you want to be deployed.

I remember in highschool a teacher's son got back from Afghanistan at the height of Canada's deployment and he talked to the class. He said that those who applied got additional counter insurgency training and of the like 18 in his group, only like four others got sent besides himself and he was a medic.

some CWO and gunners didnt like it.

something about reliability (i bet it was because of drill instructors)