I want a single-action pistol, so that means 1911. Should

File: fe9b409dd1689ba45b1ba0f15665f9200639963a867830e9248ab98d5f7e8f87.png (134KB, 436x321px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 436x321px

>Nazi's
>'

A fuddy-five is probably cheaper than a 10mm, both ammo and gun.

>>34964440
But 10mm is better for bears though, so there is that.

Colt delta

>>34964403
SAA in .45-70

File: c53029eeb1d191de5a434bf584c5d5537c2f58714e28549ab7ffbf88b6f3afd6.jpg (21KB, 495x355px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 495x355px

>>34964465
Well, if you really have a niche need for killing bears, then buy a 10mm.
If you're an average Joe who shoots his guns at his range or at dindus, .45 would be better both in the short and long-term.

>I want a single action pistol
>1911

No has yet to mention that semi-automatic pistol can't be single action. This board is truly mostly noguns.

File: 00c6449b8f516d10736afa98c5e05610a4eee10dbdda1c77725a11f4015bd5d9.jpg (57KB, 761x563px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 761x563px

>>34964556
He made an error and instead of derailing the thread and screeching autistically based on a minor mistake, we discussed his topic and gave him recommendations.
Calm your tits, life is short.

File: Draw me like one of your French automatic rifles.jpg (217KB, 862x659px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 862x659px

>>34964403
10mm is the better cartridge, but I find 45 more pleasant to shoot. And also classic to the gun obviously.

Most people don't buy 1911's as a duty/utilitarian gun (unless you're a retard), so I'd get it in fuddy-five.

>>34964556
......er what are you talking about. Browning high power and 1911 are two of many single action pistols. The hammer has to be back for it to fire. That's literally what single action is. Are you retarded?

>>34964556
Just because the hammer is cocked by the slide doesn't make it stop being single-action.

The trigger only drops the hammer, it does not cock it. Thus single-action.

File: 1470462346746.png (375KB, 572x464px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 572x464px

>>34964556

>noguns trying to tell others they are noguns

and don't even bother with the whole "hurr durr I'm just pretending to be retarded!!1" shtick because we know you're not kidding.

>>34964403
But according to your image, glocks are better.

>>34964403
Think about how quickly the entire WWWIII (Wizarding-World War III) would have ended if all of the good guys had simply armed up with good ol' American hot lead.
And have you noticed that only Europe seems to a problem with Deatheaters? Maybe it's because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made them equal.
Now I know what you're going to say: "But a wizard could just disarm someone with a gun!" Yeah, well they can also disarm someone with a wand (as they do many times throughout the books/movies). But which is faster: saying a spell or pulling a trigger?
Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova.
Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a .50bmg Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. I don't think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together after something like that. Voldemort's wand may be 13.5 inches with a Phoenix-feather core, but Harry's would be 0.50 inches with a tungsten core. Let's see Voldy wave his at 3,000 feet per second. Better hope you have some Essence of Dittany for that sucking chest wound.
I can see it now...Voldemort roaring with evil laughter and boasting to Harry that he can't be killed, since he is protected by seven Horcruxes, only to have Harry give a crooked grin, flick his cigarette butt away, and deliver what would easily be the best one-liner in the entire series:
"Well then I guess it's a good thing my 1911 holds 7+1."

File: 1499718050248.jpg (51KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1024x576px

>>34964979

>>34964403
get the ruger sr1911 in 10mm.

More power and capacity than the obsolete fuddy five, all at an affordable price.

>>34964556

this >>34964748

Stop being a tard.

>>34964979
8.7/10

Bravo, i mentally masturbate about the same premise rather frequently.

>>34964403
They're a bit harder to find, but look into CZ 75B SAO. Unless you're dead set on .45/10mm.

File: 1490795576614.png (81KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x500px

>>34964556

Rock Island Arms makes a 1911 on 22TCM. Wildcat round at 2200 fps. Standard 40 grain JHP but if you knew what you were doing, you could load 223 handloads into the brass and have a pocket rifle. Bout as powerful as a 44 mag without the wrist pain.

>>34964510
>.45 will be better in the short and long term as long as you're both a cuck and never have to use your gun to defend yourself

fix't

why not .460 rowland

10mm is more versatile, .45 is more practical.