What's all needed to build an inch pattern FAL? We're

>>34950804
Metric is superior.

Go to FAL files. Every question you want to ask has been answered 5 years ago.

Indeed, but, inch pattern receivers are popping up for an okay price on GB. More so than metric receivers.

>>34950853
Because they're mostly flawed. If you followed any BRG or fal thread you'd see the "oh why can't anyone make an inch receiver worth a shit" posts. Mags are a pain in the ass too for inch fags. You can literally google fal build tools to learn about the tools you need. Headspace is important dont be like the other retarded anon who didn't headspace and blew/bulged his receiver yeah he fixed it but he got lucky.

>>34950837
Wrong

>>34951401
You can use metric mags in inch guns as long as they aren't DSA

>>34951401
You do know you can use both metric and inch mags in an Inch pattern FAL right?

>>34953163
"No."

>>34953214
The 21 metric mags I use in my inch gun beg to differ with you

>>34953309
It's hit or miss depending on who is making the rest of the gun. QC on FALs is all over the place. Hence the quotes.

Not what you were expecting, eh?

>>34953441
My L1A1 is a century
All inch guns work with metric mags unless they are DSA or Austrian which is what DSAs are based on

Go be ignorant and wrong somewhere else

>>34953539
>century
I'll go be something, probably smug. Mostly drunk, though.

>>34953576
>is wrong

Where can I find a reputable L1A1 parts kit and receiver? Is building any more difficult than an AR?

>>34953969
Reputable parts kit? What the fuck does tha mean? Receiver you're pretty much s.o.l. lastly yes.

>>34953539
So one mag works in both rifles and the other doesn't? Seems pretty obvious which is the superior pattern friend.

>>34954001
Where can I buy a lot that isn't a shit?

>>34953969
Considerably

>>34954017
>one gun can take either mag

That makes the inch pattern better, dummy