Stopped shooting for a while; groups suffered a but what I really

>>34926499
Their all 10 shot groups btw.

I guess what I am asking is why isn't it linear?
Probably because it has more to do with focal planes than anything else?
How do I counter not being able to focus better or is that the issue?
Should I train with different targets?

Not interested too much in tactical stuff; just want nice groups.

File: 1501354142865.gif (2MB, 222x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 222x400px

>>34926606
They're*

TFW too sleepy to be posting, sorry.

>>34926499
>I guess what I am asking is why isn't it linear?

git gud

File: Untitled.png (7KB, 788x326px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 788x326px

>>34926643
No I mean why isn't a group that's twice as far, exactly the same just twice as big?

It isn't as simple as

Group size = x*distance

Stated otherwise, why doesn't "moa fag" mentality work?

>>34926499
This sounds dumb, but try shooting "beyond your target", similar to "punching through someone"

>>34926499
Looks pretty linear to me.
Also git gudder, on a good day I shoot your 10 yard groups from 27 yards. Dry fire a lot. Have someone film you at the range. Do the drill where you balance a penny on your front sight while dry firing.

>>34926698
Because of the short distances and because you are shooting a pistol offhand instead of a benched rifle, any variation in shooter error becomes more pronounced than mechanical accuracy.

>>34926739
bah, maybe you're right.

>>34926739
>>34926643
I've plateaued due to mostly to limited time and funds. Although recently I've put a red dot on a Glock and was shocked at how clearly it shows your level of suck.

I can hold a front sight steady.
I cannot hold the dot steady.
I can dry fire without visibly moving the front post or dropping a dime.
I cannot with perfect consistency dry fire without seeing the dot move.

That dot is humiliating.