>carrying a revolver for ccw why? 6 shots is not enough,

>>34911361
>6 shots is not enough
not enough to what?

also, stop projecting, kid. just because you pee down your leg under pressure doesn't mean the rest of us do.

>>34911373
to stop someone that is trying to kill you

i am looking out for you

you need more ammo to defend yourself

Even if one in six shots hit that's more than enough to make any assailant short of a bath salts snorting oogabooga become a non threat. Assuming they survive and are still standing then in all likelyness their first instinct is going to be to get AWAY from the guy that just shot them

That being said I wouldn't CC a revolver because I live in an open carry state and around where I live people treat handguns like jewlery. Giving me an excuse to join in on the autism

>>34911380
go back to your subreddit

>>34911477
i dont really use reddit sorry

File: 03e50ce427a702800a2203753201fbf5.jpg (638KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 800x800px

>>34911361
I can't seem to locate the particular graph at the moment, but if you look at collated data of self-defense shootings, it's a bimodal distribution where the vast majority end with one or two or zero shots and then a secondary peak exists where people dump rounds until they're empty. Six shots is fine; being comfortable with your weapon of choice is more important by far.
Now stop looking for hugs and get to the range and practice, Suwako.

>>34911380
>>34911373
>>34911548

See: FBI Miami Dade shooting

Unless you're an old man / have shot revolvers since childhood. There is no reason not to start on semi auto as a carry

>>34911675
>practice is the key
>but you can't so don't even try
Thanks anon.

>>34911688

I only said that because if you already have the muscle memory for it then sure.
But most people who go revolver do it for cool factor, don't even try to deny it
You shouldn't be going for cool you should go for best.

Use a semi auto, retard

>>34911697
So let me get this straight
>you have the capacity to be effective with a revolver
>just don't do it because I don't like it
Got it.

>>34911708
Read the post wrong.

>>34911548
>navy revolver
>22 flobert

hmmmm

>>34911712
But what if I want to carry a full sized pistol round?

>>34911708
>you have the capacity to be effective with a pointy stick

No reason to artificially handicap yourself with inferior weapons, unless maybe you grew up training in the way of the pointy stick for 15 years

>>34911737
Why can't you do that with semi auto?

>>34911361
Each person determines what they require for their self defense needs. Whether they want a Takedown AR or a .22lr derringer isn't something you should be worrying about. Regardless of the gun they're carrying what matters at the end of the day is that they train with it regularly.

>>34911744
Let me just bust out my Shield in .44

>>34911708
I also have the potential to fend off a mugging with my baton, doesn't mean I solely depend on it for self defense though.

Fucking idiot, unless you're a 60 year old ass man who can't learn new things and has used a revolver for 45 years you should get a semi auto

File: 1443709815585.jpg (2MB, 2587x3375px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2587x3375px

Sounds like OP doesn't need a hug, but some definitely not-pone butt.

File: desert-eagle-44-magnum-right.jpg (183KB, 1220x736px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1220x736px

>>34911749
You conceal carry a .44 revolver every day?

File: no revolver.jpg (88KB, 767x842px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 767x842px

>>34911361
Has anyone compiled any Win-Loss records for revolvers and automatics? A win meaning you survive a self defense situation, losings means you died.

It would be nice to based decisions on actual data.

>>34911771
Not all .44s have 6 inch barrels hoss.

>>34911749
>.44
only a jackass would walk around with that in the street
>>34911794
it'd be a heavy bias towards revolvers because of how much longer they've been around, or if it's within a modern one year span, semi auto because hi point,jimenez,glock

>>34911805
Here's a holster for an extra 40 dollars

>>34911739
>>34911752
So revolvers are sticks now?

>>34911871
I mean, kinda
again see FBI Miami Dade shooting

>>34911361
>why?

because some people are comfortable with revolvers

more and more I'm learning that CCW guys spend more time theorycrafting than actually doing anything with their guns, if they even have guns

>>34911871
Nothing wrong with a pointy stick, anon. A man's got to know his limitations.

A revolver has 1-half to 1-third the ammo of a modern doublestack 9mm. Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting.

If you are used to revolvers, go for it! Just don't delude yourself that you are choosing a standard weapon when you are using a significantly inferior one.

>>34911878
Kinda a one trick pony aren't you?

File: 1390038012676.jpg (7KB, 207x253px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 207x253px

>>34911913
>Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting

File: dc2.png (292KB, 830x974px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 830x974px

>>34911913
>Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting

>>34911361
But single stack semi autos carry MAYBE 8 MAX of 9mm. I'm okay with a few less rounds of 38. Muh stoppin powah

>>34911916
>doesnt refuse it
>haha why do you keep bringing that up man?
Wow really

>>34911952
It was already refuted. Statistically the number of shots used in self defense are about two, or panicked mag dumps.

Your piece of shit example is way the fuck on the extreme side of the bell curve alongside a dud round, your weapon jamming, or an assailant grabbing your semi-automatic's slide.

>>34911991
>it w-was already refuted!
Nope.
FBI
Miami
Dade
Shooting
A man got taken out because of the inherent disadvantage of revolvers

File: 1285210293620.png (195KB, 363x320px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 363x320px

>>34911913
>If you are used to revolvers, go for it! Just don't delude yourself that you are choosing a standard weapon when you are using a significantly inferior one.

a guy who is comfortable with his gun and can shoot well is always more effective than some poser once-a-year shooter with the most "advanced" gun he can get his hands on

ammo capacity is just insurance for when you happen to actually be shit at shooting

>>34912045
a guy who is comfortable and shoots well with a semi auto is better than a guy who is comfortable and shoots well with a revolver, retard. revolvers dont have a monopoly on being comfortable with a gun

nice argument moron
Knock knock!

>>34911998
The odds that I am attacked by two men armed with long guns trying to kill me are simply rediculous.

>>34912064
>a guy who is comfortable and shoots well with a semi auto is better than a guy who is comfortable and shoots well with a revolver

debatable

>nice argument

thanks bro

>>34911675
The FBI chose to engage a man and his partner who was a 3x vietnam tour army ranger armed with a semi auto rifle. How often do people with CCWs get into shootouts with armed professional bank robbers with extensive combat tours??

You may as well point to the North Hollywood shootout as to why everyone needs to carry an M60 with AP ammo.

the most powerful weapon

>>34912211
>Deabatable
fuckin XD
>>34912212
he got shot because he had to slowly reload his revolver as oppsed to a speed semi reload/not running out of ammo nearly as fast

>>34911878
you do know that a couple of the agents in that event had 9mm semi-autos, and it didn't solve the problem any quicker?

>>34912232
because they suck ass, if i was there I would have pop popped easily
i mean majority of the time it was just 1 guy

File: IMG_2582.jpg (703KB, 1539x1600px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 1539x1600px

>>34911361
Dosent matter if i miss, itll scare em to death

File: 2cheeky4u.gif (3MB, 446x411px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 446x411px

>>34911913
>Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting.

Anon you have something in common with your argument. [spoiler]Neither is hitting the target.[/spoiler]

>>34911878
See Benghazi, you need ATLEAST 20 rifles on your person or you might as well kill yourself.

>>34912253
The issue was the FBI decided not to bring smgs

File: 1501909974634.jpg (273KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 800x800px

>>34911361

File: 3880079_p0.png (88KB, 600x1400px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x1400px

>>34911361
I don't care enough what other people carry, even if I think it's a bad idea.
I'm just replying because I want the sauce for the cute mother goddess picture.

>>34911361
Becuz I can't conceal a fucking double stack giant auto.

>>34911697
>But most people who go revolver do it for cool factor
You clearly said CCW so no one is doing it for cool factor. I used to OC a S&W 19 because I don't own any semi's because I like revolvers better. Also, magnum rounds > auto rounds. Now I CC an SP-101 because now it's kinda like my S&W except fun sized. And .357 will put you on your ass and since anything involving a gun will not require a magdump unless you're a nigger (See >>34911548). You're not fighting a fucking war or professional bank robbers nor are you on a SWAT team. It's self-defense. You're not a 1-man militia.

>>34911361
I like revolvers, and .38 Special can get the job done.

And if you need more power, revolvers can handle magnum rounds.

>>34911361
I have faith in myself and the firearm that I carry at my side. If six rounds of .38, .357, or .44 can't floor someone so that I can get my distance, then I was not meant to live.

PCP got popular with the local nogs, and I can't CC a semi chambered in .44 mag.

File: 1419928146307.gif (1MB, 200x254px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x254px

>>34912582

>>34912528
Is this what the Noisy Cricket from MiB was modeled off of

>>34913887
But you can?

>>34911913
>Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting.
shot placement is king, boy. go back to your subreddit.

>>34914603
>he didn't read the study

Friction, suppressive fire, and more friction m8.

1-shot stops basically only happen when 1 side shoots: either to the CNS because they had the drop on the other side, or a psychological stop.

>>34911913
>Ammo capacity is the single most important factor in gunfights where both parties are shooting.
If you are in a fight where your adversary has a gun and is shooting you, you are already losing. Learn to pick your battles.

File: trayvonmartini.jpg (866KB, 3000x1417px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 3000x1417px

>>34911361
personally I'm most comfortable with operating, reloading, and cleaning my revolver. Its controllable and to be honest if I miss all 6 shots I deserve to die anyway

>>34911998
And someone mag dumped 3 magazines out of their 9mm and only got like a couple of hits, at the end of the day it was won by a man with a bum arm and a shotgun. What's your point?

>>34914762
To be fair that guy wore glasses and had lost them in the accident

File: morethanenoughtokillanythingthatmoves.png (530KB, 740x775px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 740x775px

>>34911361
>six shots is not enough
but anon, six shots is more than enough to kill anything that moves...

>>34915960
No

>>34915960
But is six shots of .45 Colt more than enough to kill anything that moves?

File: image.jpg (636KB, 1200x833px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1200x833px

>>34911805
>>34911831

File: 1483818552759.jpg (105KB, 1020x576px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1020x576px

>>34917557
I could sell this gun to some jungle bunny in harlem for 500 bucks, but I just deal high quality good to the right people.

>>34911361
It's about the tactical chub, not the effectiveness when it comes to a CCW, child.