Indian and Chinese troops throw stones at each other over disputed

>>34884586
>I know not what weapons WW3 will be fought with but WW4 will be fought with...
>oh nevermind

>>34884677
We thought WW3 would be fought by actual powers, not mudskins and mimic-manlets, of course they resort to this.

The war will actually break out soon.

China is just holding back until the end of the Party Congress in September, where Xi gets his second term (or is even declared livelong chairman).
After that, it's hammer tiem.

>>34884586
Its like one big airshit game.

Imagine marching onto the Norks DMZ with paintball guns and the bastards actually play along.

>>34884729
>We thought WW3 was fought by China against an actual power because of actual reasons, not a shitty piece of mountain road and against India of all people.

Fixd

China vs India may go down in history as the smelliest and most unathletic war ever

>>34884586
Considering India is involved,could be worse.

They could be flinging poop.

>>34885002
Huh. I didn't know the Indians bought Akulas. Makes sense I guess

>>34884586
Is this the birth of tactical slingshot market?

>>34884586
I only see indians dping it i bet the chinese are all chill about it and dont give a sshit which the indians do every where

This schoolyard-brawl-tier behaviour is typical of 2nd world countries. These chumps have 0 discipline.

Chinese stronk dragon memers are ridiculous, if (and that's a huge if) there ever would be a WW3 Chinese troops would be tripping over eachother ignoring orders, mutineering and surrendering.

File: j-20 ak edition.jpg (80KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x1024px

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-08/17/c_136531488.htm

>Commentary: China never backs down in defending sovereignty

China's Foreign Ministry on Wednesday once again asked India to withdraw all its troops and equipment from Chinese territory, as the border standoff in the Dong Lang (Doklam) area approaches its second month.

On June 18, over 270 armed Indian troops with two bulldozers crossed the boundary in the Sikkim Sector and advanced more than 100 meters into China.

As of end of July, there were still over 40 Indian troops and one bulldozer in Chinese territory.

China is building roads on its own territory, did not cross the boundary and notified India in advance. India did not raise any objection at that time, or any other, until its troops suddenly invaded Dong Lang. "India intentionally started this standoff to test China," said Li Qingyan of the China Institute of International Studies. China's bottom line is the border line, as shown in the 1962 incident with India. As a Chinese saying goes, "a good neighbor is better than a distant brother." China of course has no desire to enter into a war with its neighbor. China and India are two developing giants with a wide range of common interests. A sensible bilateral relationship will definitely benefit over two billion people.

The Chinese people will never back down in defending sovereignty and no country should underestimate China's resolve.

-----

More state media beating the drums of war.

>>34885002
Imagine the smell after a deployment

File: chinese global times quote.jpg (23KB, 531x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 531x300px

>>34885365

>an earlier quote from the the global times by comparison.

So /k/ do you think the US would step in if there is another border between India and China?

>>34885382
I don't get it. Do they pave a section of the sub to shit on?

File: J-10B SEAD loadout.jpg (102KB, 1024x767px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1024x767px

>a newer J-10B SEAD loadout with 2×YJ-91 anti-radiation missiles, KG500 ECM pod, a positioning pod, and PL-8 AAMs.

How can India even compete?

>>34885432
God I hope not. Just do a UN and "strongly condemn" the violence while we watch the fireworks.

>>34884819
>Imagine marching onto the Norks DMZ with paintball guns and the bastards actually play along.
That sounds fun

a war with india is a good thing
china will win in the long run but it will also exhaust china
making it weaker than the US

File: china india border.png (2MB, 1033x1262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1033x1262px

If you have an hour to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSr0w6hD2Bg

>>34886017
just a slight increased risk of cancer after they go nuclear

>>34884983
Don't give the IIDF any ideas, anon. They could be in this thread right now, ready to shitpost at any time.

I'd rather side with India, the recent Chink shillings here on the board makes me want to vomit whenever some China stronk tries to peddle his wares for 50 cents a pop.

>>34884586
Why don't the loos do this after they build the road. Once they build it, then dispute who owns it

>>34884586
Those aren't stones the Indians are throwing... It's dried shit.

File: 1492117000562.jpg (79KB, 807x432px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 807x432px

>>34884969

>>34885432
>>34885760

or at least punish the first side that pulls some bitch shit like launch nukes.

imagine this, war breaks out, huge armies fighting along the boarder neither side gaining much ground, the whole time the US sets up a secret anti-icbm system in neighboring pakistan and myanmar, who go along because they dont want to see nukes flying back and forth from their porch. fist side that launches nukes gets all of their missiles destroyed, the side that launches 2nd gets all of their missles destroyed as well except for the one heading strait for the 1st countries capital. basically first side to shoot a nuke gets their capital nuked. pretty much a win win situation for the rest of the world.

I could be worse. It could be water balloon from the Ganges

>>34888295

Pretty sure it is unironically illegal according to most rules of war treaties.

>>34885432

The indian comments in the global time articles are so salty it could almost purify their poo-water kek

>>34886026
>india literally has a place named poo at northwest
pottery

>>34888182
Because there is already a road existed which has no issues from Bhutan in the first place, the building project is more like just an upgrade. But India worries China will gain more influences on Bhutan when the upgrade is finished, so they intervene.

Also this stone incident is different from Doklam.

the chinks better watch out or the indians might start high stepping towards them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ0ue-XGl9c

File: china border AT exercise 4.jpg (471KB, 950x623px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 950x623px

>Chinese troops patrol control line on China-India border: FM spokesperson

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-08/16/c_136531379.htm

Chinese border troops have always patrolled the Chinese side of the line of control on the China-India border, said a Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wednesday in response to a recent altercation between the two troops.

According to media reports, Chinese and Indian soldiers yelled and threw stones at each other in Ladakh, a disputed area between China, Pakistan and India in southeastern Kashmir on Tuesday.

Speaking at a daily press briefing, spokesperson Hua Chunying said she was not aware of the latest reports, but added that "Chinese border troops are always committed to maintaining peace on the China-India border and always patrol along the Chinese line of control."

"We urge the Indian side to abide by the line of control agreed upon in 1959 as well as relevant regulations and conventions between the two sides, and to earnestly safeguard peace and stability in the border area," Hua said.

She also urged India to immediately and unconditionally withdraw all troops and equipment that have encroached into Chinese territory in the Dong Lang (Doklam) area.

"This is the foundation and prerequisite to the solution of the incident," Hua said.

On June 18, more than 270 Indian border troops, carrying weapons and driving two bulldozers, crossed the boundary in the Sikkim Sector and advanced more than 100 meters into Chinese territory to obstruct road construction by the Chinese side, causing tension in the area.

The trespassing Indian troops numbered as many as 400 people at one point.

As of the end of July, there were still more than 40 Indian border troops and one bulldozer illegally remaining in the Chinese territory.

---

Everyone is thinking that if another border war were to kick off it'll start next month.

>China still using horses in their military.

Fucking Kek

https://twitter.com/OedoSoldier/status/898175226017480704

>>34888255
i think you VASTLY overestimate missile defence technology

>>34884914
>ywn partake in a shenyang gangbang with your chink bros

>>34885382
was just about to say this

>>34889271
They're actually pretty useful in rough terrain. Every military uses them to some degree, particularly SOF.

>>34885464
Ive worked with indians in afghan. Their living quarters also smelled like shit, but with curry powder permeating the air as well.

>>34885002
Do their subs have designated shitting berths?

https://thewire.in/159407/doklam-india-china-bhutan/

A very good article and extensive research done into the background of the issue, geographically-speaking.

TL;DR

The current dispute is about the location of the tri-junction.

>The 1890 Sino-British Treaty marks the boundary as starting from Mount Gipmochi (we'll talk about this later) and following the bifurcation of the watershed to the boundary of Nepal.
>However, old geological surveys of the location of Mount Gipmochi have been inaccurate.
>Modern maps put Mount Gipmochi at 5 km east of its original presumed location.
>Hence, the 1890 British Treaty marks the beginning of the tri-junction boundary at modern-day Batang La (as per Indian/Bhutanese claims) rather than Mount Gipmochi.
>In constructing roads into what is essentially Bhutanese territory, the Chinese have violated their 1998 agreement to maintain the status quo.

>>34884586
DESIGNATED SHITTING ROCKS

>>34885432
Considering that theres literaly zero reason too and we have our hands tied with the norks, i wouldnt think theres much of a chance

>>34885432
This sounds like bluster and posturing. Don't the poos have local superiority in troops and equipment

>>34890517
no

File: 1498543106237.jpg (12KB, 474x473px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 474x473px

>>34884842

>>34890517
Maybe in troop numbers but in logistics, training, and equipment the Chinese are better in every way.

>>34889986
>It's another geopolitical crisis caused by the Brits drawing other country's borders
I'm not even surprised anymore

>>34891236
>IT'S WHITE PEEPPLE'S FAULT THAT MONGREL RACES CANT GET ALONG

Fuck off faggot.

>>34891268
But it is mainly British's fault. Almost 90% of Sino-India border disputes are originated from British colonists.

>>34891268
I'm sure the Germans were able to play nice with Poland when their borders were redrawn after WWI.

I wouldn't be surprised if the US secretly helps back the poos by supplying ammo or something just to prolong the war so US intel can get a look at Chinese strategies etc.

>>34884586

let me shot you its features.

File: j-10b attack run.jpg (14KB, 900x599px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 900x599px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD27woHDWbo

How do you like your "funny" Chinese propaganda?

File: brand new chinese yuan sub.png (2MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x1200px

>>34891544

As a person that pays a little attention to the PLA I'd love to see them fight India. I just want to know if the reforms the Pres. Xi put actually made a difference at a tactical level.

File: 1500925833846.jpg (9KB, 260x172px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 260x172px

>>34891311
Brits drew the border but they didn't start the fighting. Simple diplomacy could fix these issues but no, it's these damn dead colonial rising up from the grave to start throwing rocks around.

File: 1368261663120.jpg (76KB, 390x300px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 390x300px

>>34884983
Underrated.

>>34894704
>log
please stop encouraging the Indians to throw their poo across the border

>>34891544
>tfw the indians only have 10 days worth of fighting ammunition

J U S T

I wonder what the Pakis will do if shit kicks off.

File: 6eNMpvT.jpg (127KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1920x1080px

>>34884914
>>34884586
are you guys ready for the first sinking of an aircraft carrier in combat in over 70 years?

File: 76th GA 6. 炮兵营 (x9) 导弹连AFT10型反装甲导弹发射车.jpg (74KB, 721x480px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 721x480px

It looks like the 62nd Combined-Arms Brigade (合成第62旅), 76th GA of the Western Theatre Command was getting a huge upgrade in the last couple of years: They basically get the 112th Division Treatment, which is the resident Praetorian Guard of former Beijing MR (now Central TC) so to speak.

The 62nd Brigade has been confirmed to operate AFT-10 NLOS heavy ATGMs in their artillery battalion.

They would be quite an asset for mountain warfare to take out indian bunkers and tanks.

File: 6. 炮兵营 (x9) 火箭炮连PHZ10型箱式自行火箭炮.jpg (66KB, 721x481px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 721x481px

>>34894969
PHL-10 122mm modular MRLS also confirmed.

>>34894916
I don't understand what those checks and x-marks could possibly represent.

File: 6. 坦克2营 (640) ZTZ99A型主战坦克.jpg (93KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 720x480px

>>34894978
Also, this unit is the 2nd unit to receive the heavy ZTZ-99A MBTs...

File: 3. 合成3营 (3XX) ZBD04A型步战车.jpg (90KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 720x479px

>>34894993
ZBD-04A IFVs for the mech inf battalions.

File: 1. 装步1,2,3,4营炮兵连 (x24) PPZ05A型120毫米自行迫榴炮.jpg (140KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 720x480px

>>34894997
PPZ-05A 120mm auto-mortars organic to the mech-inf and armor battalions.

File: 62nd Mechanized Infantry Brigade, 21st GA, LZMR. 205416ccbzoidprzocoknd.jpg (697KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 960x640px

>>34895006
Just 3 years ago, the 62nd wasnt as well equipped as nowadays. Especially in the IFV department, where they still sported ZSD-63As.

>>34894916
I would say that the J-15 is considerably better than the MiG-29K or Tejas (was there ever a carrier version?)

Generally, I doubt that the carriers will be used if the war stays along the borders.

File: China Western Theater Command.jpg (892KB, 2358x1146px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 2358x1146px

>>34895029

To remember, the Western TC deals with Tibet, India, Central Asia.

Most units, the 62nd included, are far removed from the Indian border, though. But due to China's extensive infrastructure, they would quickly arrive in a crisis.

Amateur videos from Chinese internet indicate that the past weeks already saw considerable troop movements to Tibet from other regions of China. So, this brigade among others may already be deployed near the border.

File: DE5mDRdV0AAMFNS.jpg (176KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 960x720px

>>34895079
In fact, this is what the Indians basically expect as well. They estimate that divisional sized formations of rapid reaction units may be reinforcing the theatre, which could off-set the numerical disadvantage of the PLA vis a vis the Indian Army.

>>34884586
Sounds fun!

Hypothetically speaking i'd expect Spike operators supporting Indian Armor to be able to repel any Chinese mechanized offensive through that terrain, though the competence of Indian soldiers is suspect. Though we don't know how Chinese troops will perform either.

>>34895280
Indian Spike ATGMs would really be a headache for the PLA ground force. But IIRC they have yet to arrive.

File: svs-004u.jpg?1464969631.jpg (94KB, 700x694px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 700x694px

>>34885052
It's already a thing.

>>34895304
Damn, you're right. I thought it'd gone forward back in 2014, they still haven't fucking finalized the deal yet.

Jesus India, get your shit together.

So right now their main ATGMs are MILANs and Konkurs. Which are okay I guess, but they're not top-attack fire-and-forget missiles.

>>34895369
Generally, I think that this would be a war fought almost exclusively by airforce/helicopters, light infantry (and their associated manpacked ATGMs) and long range artillery.

China knows that its tank-force will be vulnerable along the narrow roads, and India, which indeed has some high ground there, also knows that its tanks will be out on the open and vulnerable to air strikes.

File: 1424714399447.png (343KB, 554x507px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 554x507px

>>34893745
>Simple diplomacy could fix these issues
Right, just like what Brits did in Falkland.

>>34895363
that poor, poor wrist rocket. fucking shameful.

>>34897884
>falklands internationally agreed british territory except for salty argies and is a fucking island
>this is some random pass in the middle of the mountains neither side has any real claim to but any agreement that garuntees india passage to the northwestern part of india would be a fine deal
Its funny BRICS supporting retards in the West actually thought thirdworlders could play nice.

>>34885432

Don't know, if China is the aggressor, I could easily see the US moving multiple carrier groups to the China Sea and blockading trade until a ceasefire is found.

>>34898431
>Waging countless wars and left countless mess all around world from Colonial wars, WW1, WW2, Nazi / Communist infestation,... to modern days Middle East chaos and genders wars.
>No any non-western nations can ever compete.

Its funny Western cucks actually thought they're nice and peaceful than others.

File: Z-10 formation.jpg (666KB, 1589x1923px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1589x1923px

How do India's helicopters stack up against China's?

>>34888255
Spot the underage retard

File: 1411147040624.jpg (12KB, 238x357px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 238x357px

>>34885432
>Two nobodies half a world away fighting each other over road construction.
>Should the U.S. get involved?

>>34884586
A bunch of undisciplined retards.

>Street shitter vs Street shitter

This shit will be great. I hope the poos beat the chinks so it would shut up the fiddy cent brigade.

>>34885033

Just leased iirc, and downgraded.

File: Rock_Thrower.jpg (14KB, 249x239px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 249x239px

I'm getting flashbacks of Empire Earth for some reason

>when you try to convince the world that you will be a superpower but your less than lethal weaponry is comprised of nothing but rocks

>>34885432
Would be better to strike North Korea while the Chinese are occupied.

File: DFq91e4XsAAfAz_.jpg (125KB, 1178x820px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1178x820px

https://twitter.com/OedoSoldier/status/898481003974369280

Looks like those IFVs are being put to use already in excercises.

>>34895044

No the Naval Tejas still doesn't exist yet and may never get built

>>34884677
they are already fighting future warfare
Murica, why u so behind with drones and rail guns?

>>34885382
I'm pretty sure the air on that sub is used for bottled curry flavoring

>>34899015
best game

>>34898579
I don't know why we keep pretending, it's embarrassing

>>34884983
american liberals already doing that

>>34889259
Holy fucking PT belts batman!

File: H-6K Front.jpg (428KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 2048x1365px

China urges Japanese ambassador to India to be discreet on Doklam standoff

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-08/18/c_136537309.htm

>BEIJING, Aug. 18 (Xinhua) -- A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Friday that the Japanese ambassador to India should not wag his tongue too freely on the standoff between China and India in the Dong Lang (Doklam) area.

>Spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a routine press briefing that there is no territorial dispute in that area and that the nature of the incident is that Indian troops illegally crossed the already delimited Sikkim section of the China-India boundary into Chinese territory.

>Japanese Ambassador to India Kenji Hiramatsu said in an interview with Indian media that Doklam is disputed territory between China and Bhutan and no country should use force to change its status.

>It is better not to make irresponsible remarks before making clear the facts, Hua said, stressing that it is India, not China, that is trying to create trouble and change the status quo.

>She reiterated that the premise and basis for meaningful dialogue between China and India is that India immediately and unconditionally withdraws all troops and equipment that have encroached into Chinese territory.

India and Japan v. China when /k/?

>>34900475

Japan just denied that report. I think at this moment Japan is trying not to make China/Japan relation worse. (None of Abe's men visited yasukuni shrine this year, a rare occurrence)

File: IMG_4473.jpg (33KB, 480x268px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x268px

>>34889271
Not even a chink shill, but many militaries including the U.S. still use horses in some capacity or another.