SHTF scenario, do you think safest place for POTUS is airborne

>>34846501

Neither. Safest place would be in OPs ass, cause he has taken so much cock up it, that the packed shit inside you has hardena to such a degree, that any direct attack would cause no harm to the people inside.

>>34846560

But the blast would go through the anal opening irregardless of the amount of compacted feces deeper inside.

>>34846560
>>34846581
>/k/, a magical place

>>34846501

Serious response: airborne since a flying vehicle is mobile and can change course mid-route, making a successful nuke interception difficult. This is especially true if the President is put aboard a stealthy vehicle, and if multiple vehicles (of similar type) are launched to confuse the enemy. A bunker is a static target that can be destroyed using a rocket on a single preset route.

>>34846501
The Covfefecave

>>34847248

Also, more broadly speaking it is easier to evade a nuclear bomb than it is to survive one. To defeat a bunker all the enemy needs is a bigger bomb, to defeat an airborne command post the enemy must have good reconnaissance and espionage.

The Dept. of Defense looked through all of this when they studied adding a superdeep bunker to the White House and Pentagon complexes, only to discover that the transit times downward (via elevator) would be so long where an air evac (by helicopter onto a 747) would be quicker. Also, the Russians could just build a bigger bomb (or hit DC with multiple bombs), which would create enough pressure waves to destroy the bunker without hitting it directly.

A similar study was later done for Manhattan Island itself (but for civilians) that largely came to the same conclusion: it is far cheaper to just evacuate people than to bury them underground.

>>34847248
>>34847275
Any idea how deep we're talking? I mean if it takes longer to go deep enough to survive a nuke than it does for the missile to be detected, that's gotta be an ungodly depth underground.

>>34847274
Nice meme

(You)

>>34847365
Will Americans of the future be mole people?

>>34846501
Nuclear submarine

>>34846501
Why does the president have a right to be safe in a SHTF scenario? If anything bad enough to warrant a bunker or hiding on a plane is going on then he probably had a hand in causing it and needs to suffer like everyone else.

>>34847627
I hope you're not actually serious

>>34847627
>what is COGCON