You judge guns that you have no experince with by how well they

>>34843379
Nah, I watch youtube videos and read forums so people can tell me my opinion on the subject matter.

>>34843379
I judge them by youtube videos. It's why I thought the FAL was inaccurate and the G36 overheated easily for a while.

>>34843379
I remember playing host on N64 as a kid and thinking it was the hottest shit.

>>34843420
*that wtf iPad

File: syphon-filter-usa-v1-1[1].jpg (207KB, 600x597px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 600x597px

Totally true.
It's how I know guns are actually totally useless and tazers are really the best weapons available.
There's no gun that match the abilities of the tazer:
>range of at least 100 yards
>accurate homing projectiles
>ability to stun, electrocute, or ignite enemies on fire
>no need for ammo, just wait for it to recharge

>>34843379
lol
Did a USP owner call you names?

>>34843450
Not really, no. I love me some USP. It just seems that every vidya brings up some gun that is more porn-o-matic than the rest.
A lot to do with iron sight usability, field of view and recoil management/animations. A USP may feel amazing in Raven Shield, but may suck ass in Call of Pripyat is what Im saying.

File: 1500008743955.png (318KB, 572x462px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 572x462px

>>34843572
I buy guns on cool factor, so what? Still want a galill cuz of Counter Strike, and a Webley because of CoD II. (looking around, would probably get a shaved cylinder one that accepted moon clip 45 acp)

>>34843379
Don't play games, haven't in over a decade. I judge a weapon by handling them. Games can never simulate how fucking awesome real firearms are. I may be one of the few people who loves smelling like burnt gunpowder, hoppes #9 and sweat, while covered in welts from hot brass. That to me is a great day at the range.

>>34843379
>>34843379
this game was the shit... and socom us navy seals... love these 2

I bought a Garand because I always wanted one since I was 12 and played Medal of Honor.