Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
why dont they develop remote control cruise missile? just install a camera and your co-pilot can guide it in at low subsonic speeds. would be great for counter insurgency shit. we already spend money on bullshit anyway. jdams are not accurate enough because theyre coming in from one angle. straight above. they could even install launch sights at combat airfields if you cant strap them to a long loiter aircraft. but they'd need something with a high ceiling so manpads cant knock them down. store like 80 of them bitches in a stratofortress. but add more explosive than standard cruise missiles so its slower. troops could call in cruise missiles easily when in contact.
is this possible?
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-65_Maverick
>>
>>34841309
im talking about a tv missile that doesnt exist
>>
File: stupid.jpg (81KB, 687x369px) Image search:
[Google]
81KB, 687x369px
>>34841280
>>34841404
>>
>>34841404
I fail to see what your idea does that a HIMARS battery or AC-130J doesn't.
>>
>>34843205
Or a fleet of MQ-9s for that matter.
>>
So a TV guidance suite for a JDAM kit?
Ok.
>>
>>34841280
>jdams are not accurate enough
Wrong. They're very accurate, have large blast radius and literally give the best bang for your money.
>>
>>34841280
I think they should use like cool camera sunglasses n stuff for the remote control, and maybe make them iphone controllable. then it would be easier access for troops n stuff. XDXDXD
>phone controlled missile >blow up orphanage >who was phone
>>
>>34841280
can you go be retarded somewhere else?
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3