Is it possible to defeat an enemy's SEAD attempts without

>>34821134

You mean like with 10,000 nuggets?

>Is it possible to defeat an enemy's SEAD attempts

Yes. It's literally Russia's whole air defense posture towards NATO. To have a really dense SAM network with a lot of redundancies in order to withstand any SEAD operations.

>>34821152

How often has it been tested?

>>34821134
Yes, but not if they never run out of planes or make it impossible to shoot those planes down which is the case when fighting the US.

>>34821134
Probably, that's what the Russians have been going for for ages now. But like >>34821362 said, that capacity is degraded if most of the planes you're trying to shoot down can get weapons grade track on you before you can get one on them. Hence all this stealth business.