Do people here like H&K, I personally don't care for

File: 1468163493770.jpg (171KB, 1143x499px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1143x499px

>>34784679
>Has anyone had any bad experiences with them or are they as good as people say?

The first two MR223 and the first MR308 which I've seen at the range all had considerable failures and the MR308 was locked up so hard it had to go to a gunsmith.

I hear the guns available now are pretty decent, but that's one hell of a first impression.

I've always had an irrational sweet spot for the Mk23 though... The only reason I don't have one is because I can't legally get suppressors, so it's kinda retarded.
I don't hate HK, they often make decent guns. But they're not super special.

I suspect that at some point I'll crack and buy an HK53 clone.

God fucking damnit why do all HK pictures have the fuckin bullet in wrong?

>>34784679
The old ass delayed roller system is fuckin sexy and is my favorite action
As for the handguns I've only handled a few but damn theyre smooth

>>34784753
It was a dumb shit photographer who didnt know anything about guns so his dumbass put the bullets backwards because they fit and no one cared enough to notice it before the magazine went to SHOT i think.

>>34784761
I would take a HK45 or P30L any day over a glock 17 or 21

>>34784804
https://youtu.be/XiX2rb3cgzY
>kek

>>34784679
I love H&K A E S T H E T I C S but I've heard hit or miss things about their product's performances.
That said I would love to own, in no particular order.
G36C
Mk.23
All the G3 variants
MP7