Provided that it could be contained, would giving C2I to an AI

File: the-terminator.jpg (81KB, 990x600px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 990x600px

bump

why would a high altitude stealth bomber ever need to be piloted by AI? Its never going to need to make a decision or perform an action that a human cant.

>>34784005

Wouldn't equipping anything deployed in the field with AI just make it a boon to whoever inevitably shoots it down and hauls away your very advanced, very expensive kebab remover?

Autonomous weapons in general make no sense to me.

If we assume that an almost arbitrarily powerful AI exists, then yes, the ability to process data from varying sources near instantaneously and objectively is a massive advantage in warfare. How realistic the creation of such an AI is is another question of course.

>>34784460
The more pressing question is, if they had it, would they plug it in?

>>34784460
>the ability to process data from varying sources near instantaneously and objectively is a massive advantage in warfare.

We already have that, it's called a human brain

We can't even build AI's that can run a mcdonald's yet, there's no chance we'll build military-grade AI's that surpass people any time soon

>bb-b-b--bbut someday we will

ok then come back to me when we do

>>34784644
Soon.

https://www.iarpa.gov/index.php/research-programs/microns

>>34784411
usually the more advanced stuff isn't on the drone, but in some secure bunker away from battle

>>34785332
>but in some secure bunker away from battle
>Bunker
Try a trailer in Arizona.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wlsd9mljiU

>>34784644
http://techdigest.jhuapl.edu/views/pdfs/V15_N3_1994/V15_N3_1994_Irani.pdf

>>34785361
Not really AI

We can't even really define what a proper AI is yet, much less create one. When we figure those bits out, then we can start looking into how useful they'd be on drones.

>>34784383
>he does't know the "drone swarm" concept

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O01G3tSYpU

>>34786549
>He doesn't know video game cheats are leagues ahead of you
It's called multiboxing. Control a swarm of units by having them mimick a "command unit" that a human directly controls. If the command unit is destroyed control can be seamlessly transfered to another drone.

https://youtu.be/0zdwB0bN5no

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYYZjTx92KU

>>34784383
> Its never going to need to make a decision or perform an action that a human cant

It takes a human a quarter of a second to react reflexively and minutes to make a plan.

A flight combat AI like ALPHA adjusts its plans 250 times a second. AI aren't better because they have faster reflexes, they're better because they do more plans and adjust them on the fly.

>>34787679
But they can only make decisions they have programming to do, there's not critical thinking of abstract thought involved.

>>34785816
Don't see a human pilots on Tomahawk.

>>34784383
the more reason for it to be piloted by ai, doesn't need a complicated ai and saves weight and space for pilots and their cockpit, bathroom, bedroom etc what they need on a long range bomber, saves money needed to train pilots, to pay them salary, their insurance etc

>>34788411
yeah you are right, thats the same with Soldiers and Tank drivers, why use them when we could just use .... dunno Robot.

>>34788347
A tomahawk simply seeks out the target coordinates, it doesn't make any decisions.