https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=c3a0df63ed769522a0cdf3df867774e8&tab=core&_cview=1
>>34769826
No, Nathaniel, it's not.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/08/05/breaking-7-62mm-rifle-replace-m4-carbine-interim-combat-service-rifle-solicitation-released-us-army/ another link.
>>34769833
I'm not Nathaniel.
>>34769826
They aren't going to adopt anything: they've been testing rifles "seriously" for decades and they always back out.
use the catalog
>>34769969
I did.
>>34769969
I did too