>.45 being shot through a wet, decent sized suppressor makes

>>34767372
Well .45 is already essentially a subsonic round from it's low muzzle velocity, so not breaking the sound barrier doesn't issue a report.

But less noise than hitting a steel target? well that shit's a bit loud, not sure what bearing the suppressor being wet has on how quiet it works.

>>34767372
Very hard to tell given the steel is far away and the muzzle is next to your ears and one sound is sharp and fast and the other resonates. Not that I know shit about .45 suppression, but with suppression in general, there's definitely some relative, perceived wiggle room.

https://youtu.be/SLAauCv53CU
https://youtu.be/nINKFpsi5Bo

>>34767432
Youtube is not a good source to measure sounds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1-IOu3m11Y (just listen to the gun firing, it's ridiculously silent even the steel target makes a louder sound)
you want concrete evidence you need dB measures

Myth.

t. 45 osprey owner

>>34767522
Just sharing little clips, definitely aware audio recording devices don't capture the peaks of sound.

>>34767526
Really? what gun? pics please? wet or dry?

>>34767390
i don't think wet matters for sound pressure? it seems reasonable that it might, but i don't actually know that. i thought people only shot wet to eliminate first round flash.

Once I saw some fucking inbred dump a can of diet soda into a suppressor so he could "run it wet". That's one level below the one toothed bump firing dirt shooting inbreds at the local gravel pit.

>>34767526

ospreys aren't the best can in the world either. you sacrifice db reduction for it's shape