What is the most heavily armed bomber in history? Is it the Tu-4?

>>34745247
Any nuclear-armed bomber.

>>34745247
Enola Gay B-29, armed with nuke

>>34745261
>>34745270
Yeah, I mean defensive weapons. Also, Tu-4 could carry an RDS-4, 50% more powerful than Fat Man.

>>34745247
It's a B29. Russians just reverse engineered interned B29s.

>>34745506
B29 only had 1 canon.

File: Aluminium_overcast.jpg (811KB, 1920x1293px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 1920x1293px

>>34745247
How about 16 20mm guns?

>>34745570
Nice. All that's left to do is make it nuclear-powered and arm it with SLAM.

>>34745247
Tumor 4, we meet again

>>34745570
>possible to be engaged by 12 guns at the same time
>almost 10000 rounds per minute
>more throw weight than two M163s
enough dakka?

File: Mythbusta.jpg (96KB, 768x900px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 768x900px

>>34745669

>>34745584
Half way there.

File: NB-36H.jpg (240KB, 1214x736px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1214x736px

>>34745723
>>34745584