This gun sucks ass >Looks like shit >Heavy as all fuck

>>34632598
when baiting, a subtle hand is better than simply throwing everything in at once my child.

>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
>Asinine grip angle
Manlet detected. Kill yourself with your P32 that you use as a full size

>I know it's bait, I justed wanted to call him a manlet

>>34632598
You're right about everything except
>looks like shit

>>34632856
I agree, tried one for the first time and it was garbage just...why? Is it sexy? Yes. Does it feel like a competitor to any modern handgun in any way at all... no. Would almost literally choose any gun over this as far as practicality.

>>34632598
>only 15 rounds
how many fucking rounds do you need you fucking nerd?
>shit ergos
manlet detected
>looks like shit
its A E S T H E T I C

File: IMG_0450.jpg (180KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 500x376px

>>34632598
>Looks like shit
Subjective
>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
Pretty heavy compared to poly guns, but you can get flush fit 17 round mags
>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
After market G10 grips helps or you can purchase the Vertec version
>Asinine grip angle
Training issue, easily overcome
>Safety
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
Kits exist to convert to decocker only

You sound like you've never fired one in your life

>>34632598
>Looks like shit
Opinions

>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
Can your manlet hands only support a maximum of 2lbs?

>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
sounds like you have baby hands my dude

>Asinine grip angle
Get a Vertec model if you need to play a 1911 fanboy

>Safety
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
Upgrade to the Decocker kit

>>34632598
Ever used one? That is one sexy beast, great stuff.

File: Walther-PPK-.380-ACP[1].jpg (67KB, 728x540px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 728x540px

>>34632598
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
Well, yknow what else has a slide mounted safety and is beautiful to see and use?
>pic related
I know you like this gun, so you have to like the emm ninety two eff ess as well, you double-standard hipocrite.

File: e113-2[1].jpg (89KB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 540x405px

>>34632598
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY REEEE

File: WHEN.jpg (1MB, 4500x3375px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4500x3375px

>Looks like shit
Nuh uh, it looks beautiful.
>Heavy as fuck
Stable as fuck.
>Shit ergos made for fat handed hambeasts.
Pic related, OP on the left
>Asinine grip angle
Entirely perfectly fine OK grip angle.
>Safety
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
Convert to decocker only or just deal with it, it works fine.

>>34632598
>Looks like shit
Maybe to someone that grew up looking at plastic glocks
>15 rounds
Mine holds 18
>shit ergos
Maybe for dainty manlets
>Asinine grip angle
Sure, if you've never shot one
>slide mounted safety
Mine has a decocker

Well it has been about a month since the last time we went over this. Isn't it time we picked a new gun as bait or does the 92 just work because it's so iconic

>>34633206
>down for safe, up for fire
What was he thinking?

>>34632893
P320 does 21 in a smaller, lighter package.

>>34633206
>Implying the PPK isn't terrible to shoot and you only like it because Sean Connery made it look good

>>34632634
fpbp, op has much to learn in the art of bait

>>34632826
WHEN WILL THEY LEARN

>>34634674
Wow that has accurately potrayed every 92fs thread I've seen in two years. I would like to see the Taurus 92fs mentioned in it tho

>>34632598
>looks like shit
Wrong. It's iconic as fuck. Max Payne, Leon the Professional, literally every single John Woo movie.

>only 15 rounds
"Only"

>shit ergos
Tiny hands baby dick detected

>slide mounted safety
Ok, I agree with that one.

I like the m9a2 much better. It's accurate. The open slide makes it able to fire alot of rounds consecutively without ever melting the barrel. Good for civilian use. However should not be a service pistol. In Afghanistan the dust was so bad that I'd have to clean it daily or it would jam due to the open slide. I hate that the safety decocks it so I can't carry locked and cocked. Other than that it's ok.

File: 1493327724586.png (362KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 700x700px

What is so bad about slide mounted safeties? I like them.

How has nobody mentioned
>fudd
So far?

>>34632598
>>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
>>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
>>Asinine grip angle

These are the only actual negatives you listed. Everything else is autistic screeching.

>>34635673
glock babbies dont understand safeties, so it scares them

>>34632598

For some reason, I shoot my M9 better than any other pistol I own. I don't know why. If I had to fire a pistol in anger at someone, I'd hope that's the one I had with me.

File: M9A3 Suppressed 1 Smol.jpg (2MB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2016x1512px

Good thing the M9A3 exists then to fix everything :^)

>>34635673
There is nothing wrong with them so long as you aren't a manlet with tiny hands or, as anon said here >>34635796, a Glockfag with no understanding of safeties that don't ruin your trigger.

File: Beretta8.jpg (208KB, 887x710px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 887x710px

>>34635933
>M9A3
I want one of these to go with my classy 92FS

>>34632598
t. tiny hand manlet

File: Jake.gif (2MB, 250x220px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x220px

>>34635933

I'm not buying an A3 until it comes in black and they remove all that retarded shit on the frame.

>WARNING: READ MANUAL BEFORE USE RETRACT SLIDE TO SEE IF LOADED. FIRES WITHOUT MAGAZINE

>>34632598
You're right. An 1860 cap and ball Colt would be better.

>>34635955
It's well worth the price.

>>34635971
It'll probably never come in black and they'll never remove that annoying slide warning. Welcome to handgun manufacturers afraid of lawsuits.

>>34636221

My commercial M9 doesn't have that horseshit on it, though.

Apparently OP's pic is a duplicate of the one I was about to upload, so if you wanna see what I mean just look at that. There's no warnings of any sort on it.

>>34632598
Glocks didn't get the military contract, let it go bro.

You keep attacking steel guns when you have nothing anymore.

>>34633265
>Pic related, OP on the left
>He probably makes 5x what you do

It was pretty good for it's time. The grip angle and width work for people with human-sized hands. The slide mounted safety is a definite negative though.

>>34635529
Oh yea I completely forgot that it exists.

>>34634675
Probably that if down was fire the safety would slice the shit out of your thumb

Not gonna lie, the only reason why I bought an M9 is because of Resident Evil.

File: fuck this.gif (2MB, 353x234px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 353x234px

>>34632598
>>Looks like shit
Stopped reading there.

Way to prove you're an idiot. May as well have led with "I'm a huge faggot.''

>>34632598
15 rd capacity? Is op retarded?

>>34635971
>Not buying a 1986 Beretta 92F
>Not having the classic blued Italian made Beretta without warnings

When will people learn?

>>34638975

Apparently. 30 mins ago I grabbed my M9 to check around the house because my dogs were going apeshit and I did so with 20+1 capacity.

OP is always a fag.

>>34632634
>>34632826
>>34639032

Even though the gun looks amazing, I have to agree with OP. It's heavy as fuck, you could kill someone just by throwing it at them. The gun is loud as fuck even when it's suppressed and it feels like you're wielding a power tool meant for construction with gloves on.

>>34639225

That may be true, but it's a combat handgun. It's not for concealing or carrying with you to pick up groceries. For whatever reason that I can't explain, when I point and shoot I hit what I want to hit. I am so fast and accurate with my M9 that I don't even consider grabbing my G19, one of my 1911s, the Hi Power, one of the M&Ps, my S&W 1006, any revolver, my SP-01, ect.

I almost always grab my M9 because I am confident that it will do what I need it to do. It just jams with me, and that's enough to overcome whatever size or weight downfalls it may have to some.

File: 1500761940497.png (35KB, 957x558px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 957x558px

>>34632598

>>34635673
Literally nothing. Much like a heel mag release it's all a matter of training for a different manual of arms. 99% of people who post about them are glockfags and 1% are sigfags, both of which are so overcome by a sense of smug superiority that they would never consider training for a new platform.

>>34640243
Yeah man just use an 1800s musket, it's fine. You just need to overcome the training issue and a different manual of arms.

>>34639267
This. Full size, steel frame pistols are the best for everything but carry.

>>34632598
I can't help but feel like someone is baiting me...

File: low quality bait.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>34640823

>>34640823
Lol if I just post retarded shit I don't have to make arguments!

6'1 masterrace here

Its a fucking joy to shoot the Beretta.

Unfortunately the slide-mounted decocker is pants on head retarded.

Weight is not a specific argument against the Beretta. Other full-sized metal framed guns like the P226, CZ75, 1911, etc weigh as much as or more than the 92. Weight is more of argument for metal vs polymer than it is for 92.

Also, I don't understand what the issue with the safety is. It's in reach of your thumb where you can flick it on and off and tripping the safety lever is only an issue for hamplanets with sausage fingers trying to power stroke the slide when the manual specifically says not to but they're too lazy/dumb to train properly. Or maybe they're just completely lacking thumbs, I don't know. At the end of the day, it works.

File: 1493171887528m.jpg (198KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1024x576px

>>34641485
>weight is relevant in civilian carry when you're going to the grocery store in your cargos
>weight is not relevant when shtf and you're running 2 miles to your destination in full gear

File: tfw Beretta.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>34641485
You can power stroke a 92FS..... even if you have big hands....

you just have to train for it and not be retarded.

File: 1499383603201.jpg (433KB, 1836x2197px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1836x2197px

>>34632598
>>Looks like shit
Objectively untrue

>>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
Lighter than 1911s, CZs, and other common steel framed handguns.
They ship with 17 round magazines nowadays unless you're a time traveler from 1980. Also god-tier mec gar 18 round flush fit magazines available.

>>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
I'm sorry you were born with little pudgy baby manlet hands.

>>Asinine grip angle
Preference. Points naturally for some.

>>Safety
Decocker-only configuration is the way to go. Otherwise the slide safety is an overblown meme.

>>34632598

>Looks like shit

You are wrong. It's got the late 70s, early 80s aesthetic which beats the soullessness of the G17 and it's successors and imitators.

>Heavy as all fuck

And plastic fantastic with a tac light, red dot, a suppressor, 25 rounds of ammo and my dick isn't?

>only a 15 round capacity

It's a late 70s, early 80s design. 15 was pretty much as high as it went until the Glock 17.

>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts

Military and law enforcement had yet to be enriched by tiny handed man- and femlets. Just because your tiny booger hooks can't reach the controls like a big boy, doesn't mean everyone is, Tom Cruise.

>Asinine grip angle

Ah, look who has tiny hands!

>Safety

So did every other gun at the time. Lots still have a manual safety. Point? Or just more bitching from Tom Cruise hands?

>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY

You get a banana sticker for that one son.

File: 80678563464596.png (239KB, 1000x416px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1000x416px

>>34642567
>Tom Cruise

Not even an argument. Tom Cruise can work the gun just fine.

>>34632598
People like it because the size and weight make it easy and comfy to shoot accurately. Plus it's not expensive, and has been around long enough that parts and accessories are easy to get.

>>34635933
>>34635971
The color is one of the best things about it though

File: IMG_0364.png (3MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1440px

>>34632598
la mia famiglia says go fuck yourself.

File: downloadfile.jpg (472KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1600x1600px

Im actually considering picking up a berreta 92fs inox (ghost) on my 21st birthday? What do you think?

Im 20 right now so i can't but a pistol at all in California (i can litterally buy anything else because logic)
I currently own a Ruger GP100 (in my dads name till my birthday)
My older brother owns a CZ75B
And my dad owns a sig p226
I have shot the hell out of both my dads and bros handguns.
Im just looking for somthing different that doesn't cost more then $800 as thats my budget as im young/broke and working. Any other recommendations?

>>34632598
>Looks like shit
Subjective
>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
Heavier than a lot of modern pistols, sure.
But not impossible to draw and aim quickly with practice.
Also 15 rounds is perfectly fine. You aren't getting into a firefight.
>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
I personally haven't had problems with it and I got stick fingers, but hey different people, different preferences.
>Asanine grip angle
Again, no personal problems
>Safety
>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
If it's that much of a problem for you just get a conversion kit.
I need to sound like I'm typing something important at work, so thanks for this bait.

>>34632598
Glock=tool, bare minimum, no ergos Beretta=weapon

File: StarModelB4.jpg (148KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 800x523px

>>34642972
I am almost certain they got him some Brazilian made 92 knockoff in a smaller size/caliber.
Kinda like the Star Model B they used in Hollywood a lot because tons of actors couldn't handle .45ACP blanks.

>>34644666
>couldn't handle .45ACP blanks

No, they used them because 9mm blanks are cheaper and more available. You'll find Hollywood armorers rechambering odd-caliber pistols to 9mm all the time.

File: 189467546189.jpg (56KB, 800x333px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 800x333px

>>34644666
>they got him some Brazilian made 92 knockoff

Satanic trips says you're lying.
In M:I2 he had a Brig and a Compact. In M:I 3, he used a standard FS and an Elite IA.
Source: www.imfdb.org/wiki/Mission:_Impossible_II
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Mission:_Impossible_III

>couldn't handle .45ACP blanks.
That makes no sense. The 92 already fires 9mm.

>>34643936
>no brigadier
get on that

>>34644582
One of the finest variants of one of the finest firearms made. You won't be disappointed.

>>34632598
>This mad
Im sorry you lost call of dooty match with this gun, but there is no reason to be this angry.

>>34632598
RQ:

>no
>yea but not always a negative
>ok yea, kinda. i really feel like they should have done a little more with the gun ergonomically but hey some people claim to like it and i hear it's pretty in offensive. Plenty of room and not much to bump up against.
>not that bad, not that great.
>you don't even know what you're talking about anymore.
>ok yea that's kinda true. Can also me turned to a decocker though.

Mostly it's because they tend to be extremely reliable with quality mags and very accurate to boot. The heavy weight and design helps keep recoil low too. Also, nostalgia. Real question's why you're so mad about people liking it instead of whatever memegun you think is perfect currently.

>>34646336
M9 silenced HCTDM is great

So what do people think of the 92 compact for carry? Does the design suffer any weird issues being scaled down bit? The capacity doesn't bother me and i like metal hammer fired guns, but how does it compare to say a USP(i realize is plastic) or CZ P01?

>Tfw waiting to get some samurai edge grips
>tfw the guy never emailed me back

File: muh compact.png (245KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 750x500px

>>34646984
I own and carry one.

I haven't found any real design issues due to the scale-down, and I've owned 2 full sized 92s. The mags come with a small pinky extension, so you can get your full hand on it. It can be a little tricky to conceal depending on what clothes you like to wear. I've had it now for 3 years and I've never had any malfunction of any sort with any ammo.

10/10 would trust life with.

>>34647099
I'm really tempted to buy one to carry. I love my full sized M9 and I figured I'd love a compact 92

File: Compactman.png (2MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1000px

>>34647128
The only downside is the size, really. But proper placement and a slightly baggy shirt does the trick.

Other than that, it's basically like carrying a regular ol' 92/M9.

Oh, and it does have a fucking billboard of text on the side. Doesn't really bother me, but I know it irks some people.

sick of anti gunner making these anti gun posts

>>34633206
>>34633210
These guns are shit too.

>>34635620
Two mad-dog killers, ready to murder each other! They step into the next room, and I'm thinking, now they're gonna do it.

But no! They sit down in front of a TV, and solve their differences with a kung fu fighting video game!

I tell you, I was so depressed, I strangled them both with the video game cables.

>>34646256
Replacing the 84 first then we'll talk 92G-SD.

File: IMG_1230_zpsptwqdka1.jpg (237KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1024x768px

The turks made a decent copy. I like steel frames and you're a picky manlet

>>34642409
That's a weak ass argument considering its a full size service sidearm and not a CC piece.

>>34648901
I'm thinking about finding a Girsan Centurion copy.

File: 1459303066166.jpg (17KB, 274x540px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 274x540px

>>34642437
Top fucking tier cigarettes

>>34644666
>Kinda like the Star Model B they used in Hollywood a lot because tons of actors couldn't handle .45ACP blanks.
you mean because it took hollywood until the fucking 90s to design a .45 blank that cycled properly

>>34648990
I only paid $500CAD but the finish is good and it's well machined. Personally I do find the design heavy but it has it's place. Not a big fan of polymer either

>>34650719
meant for
>>34649109

>>34650719
Which model did you get - the compact mc or the mc 39?

>>34650735
Yavuz 16 >>34648901

>>34639225
Heaviness is sign of reliability. If you run out of bullets? Just hit them with it.

>>34634674
These get my every single time

>fucking laffed

>>34635933
That is a cool gun

>>34635019
Sorry you have shit grip technique and the slide huwrts youwr widdle fingewr webbing :(

>>34640243

My duty gun is a 226 but I don't have any problems with the 92fs. Why do people hate things so?

>>34632856
>>34632880
I'm glad I'm not the only one. Man the exposed barrel so lewd.

I shot better with USP 9mm. I'm gonna get one just to have it and not shoot it.

>>34635673
>it is possible to engage them while racking
>harder to disengage than frame mounted

>>34632598
I don't get it. I have a small hands ( to the point it's often easier to use lefty mag release with pointer finger) but I have no problem with Berreta.

>>34632598

>Butthurt manlet detected

>>34632598

>having girly hands too dainty for a combat pistol

File: 1499372126901.jpg (46KB, 500x411px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x411px

>>34635720
>Beretta 92s
>fudd

>>34633206
You wanna know how I know you've never shot a ppk?

>>34651139
Boris pls

>>34632598
>>Heavy as all fuck with only a 15 round capacity
What a puss, it's a duty sized metal pistol you jack wagon. Capacity was (reliable) improvement for the time period. Now you can get 15/18/20 mags.
>>Shit ergos, made for fat handed hambeasts
Your a CZfag aren't you with kiddy hands
>>Asinine grip angle
92fs is more comfy than m9 in my worthless opinion
>>Safety
Training you worthless shit or leave it off like an adult.
>>SLIDE MOUNTED SAFETY
CZ or Hi-Power/1911 fanboy

>>muhmuhmuh why can't things be like my other favorite things?

>>34653914
That guy's an idiot, but he has a point....sort of.
We live in an age of polymer strikers now. the 92 and all the other metal frame wonder nines are showing their age.