Anyone here ever use one of these on a gen 4 glock? Seller says

looks like a claw machine game where you try to pick up a glock

>>34622411
Yup was wondering if it adds any utility.

>>34622400
Say goodbye to your dog, OP.

>>34622437
They can take the cat out I'll be okay.

>>34622400
That's an assault rifle, buddy.

File: MPA 30DMG with Shockwave arm brace.jpg (75KB, 800x416px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x416px

>>34622437
>>34622490
it's a "brace" not a stock. How? I don't fuckin know but the ATF approved it

>>34623163
ATF cray.

File: 12096092_823580347740271_9150863769132814967_n.jpg (263KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 960x720px

>>34622437
>>34622490
Look at what I have here

>>34622400
You have to cut the wedge down by hand and not mess up the angle or there goes $50
And it will still be wobbly at the top.

And it will force your dominant arm off to the side like using a thumbhole stock rather that normally gripping a pistol

File: micro_roni_stab_1.jpg (49KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 650x650px

>>34625211

you forgot the stabilized version

>>34625542
Someone gun show chink just tried to sell me this with the Glock included for $900, I've never heard of it before but he said it didn't require a tax stamp or anything because it wasn't classified as a stock

Did I just save my pupper?

>>34625701
900? what a joke
ive seen glock 17's brand new on sale for 450 plus the roni "carbine" kit for 200, in total $650 not including shipping.
i wouldve told that guy "ill buy it for 600" just to piss him off

>>34626140
But is it actually legal?

>>34626228
Depends if that "magazine holder" on the front is considered a grip by the ATF. Looks questionable to me. If the company has a letter from the ATF then it'll be legal.
The stock is an "arm brace" and not actually a stock so that part at least it's legal

>>34626281

If the OAL of the firearm was made to be 26" or longer, then the magazine holder wouldn't be of concern anyway. However, ATF has been very peculiar over the years.

Back in the pre-AWB days, there was a gun called the Kimmel AP-9. A somewhat copy of the Tec-9, it had an accessory you could order from the factory that was a type of horizontal "grip" that mounted to the barrel shroud, but only horizontally. Wasn't advertised as making the gun an NFA item either, so it was either good to go or nobody gave a shit.

Speaking of the Tech, you might make the argument that the magazine holder is no different than the magazine on a Tec 9. Yes, it doubles as a handle, but that's not it's primary function.

>>34625297
Well the adaptor is like $13.50 but if it's shit I won't bother. Seemed like it would be more stable for longer shots