I have a question for you /k/, if the toe shoes were made to military standards would they be useful in combat or would the standard boot design be better overall? If so, are there applications where a "toe boot" would actually be useful?
>>34620664
>are there applications where a "toe boot" would actually be useful
Tactical footsie.
>>34620664
The Japanese used something like it in WWII I believe.
>>34620664
Please don't bring back fivefingers. They are ugly and the people who wore them were incredibly obnoxious.
>>34620664
that shit is homosex.
>>34622481
So is this board.
>>34620664
They would be "ok" but the military also needs boots that can take a big fucking beating and stand through a lot of conditions and on top of that be cheap.
>>34622512
>So is this board.
no it isn't
>>34622524
boy, you don't even know where you is
>>34622524
>>34622530
>>34622533
faggots git out
>>34622574
You sure are new here aint ya?
>>34622588
nope
Ive worn these, they feel fucking great. Shame they look like shit.
>>34620664
>rock falls on foot
>twist ankle
etc
not a good idea
>>34622464
I have a pair of them, they make amazing footwear for around the camp site, or when you got to cross a river (Fuckers can easily be rolled up, weigh next to nothing, dry hella fast) for every day wear, those things are gay.
>>34620664
they're not even an improvement on shoes. your question is stupid and so are you.
The only "military" personnel that I have seen wear this were fat airmen who thought them wearing it would lower their run times.
Instead of, you know, just running on their spare time.
>>34620664
The only pair you'll ever need.
>>34622592
What do you think you're going to hit without a front sight, you big green faggot? Or is that the front sight post you shove up your boyfriend's ass when he's being naughty?
>hey you know what'd be better than just getting blisters on the outside of your feet during ruck marches and long movements is getting blisters BETWEEN YOUR TOES TOO
Also the number of people breaking their toes by dropping shit on their feet would skyrocket.
>>34622658
>High boots
>Sneaking
>>34620664
Those actually look pretty good for developing foot strength, but God do they look so homosex.
>>34620664
I used to run in these bc I got shin splints bad with regular running shoes. Honestly they helped me relearn how to run without striking my heel, and I could give negative shits about what people thought of my footwear if I'm not in pain.
Tbf though, trail running is tough with them bc pebbles, sticks sometimes poke/get stuck between your toes; there's no way a military would adopt them.
I wore holes in the bottom of mine running so much. I kept a pair that I now use as river shoes when kayaking.
>>34622481
>that shit is homosex.
No. I'm a faggot and I think those are absolutely disgusting.
Honestly having individual toes is just useless, having thin soles tho is pretty good for all around use, not for military use tho.
>>34620727
tabi are the shit
i have a full rubberized pair and they're comfier than anything I've ever worn on my feet at any given point of my life
>>34622658
>look up prices out of curosity
>$1,845.99 to $2,580.00 USD
ISHYGDDT
>>34620727
That seems like a much better design than individual toes. Much less likely to hurt yourself, yet have slightly more agility.
I was in the Army before and when these got popular. No one cared when it was just a few officers, warrants, and SNCOs wearing them and doing PT on their own. The minute enlisted and NCOs started wearing them to PT formations. The old farts got fanny flustered because they were slightly different but with in the rules. So the army banned them.
Which is a shame, because they really did help me with my running form. Though I did just keep wearing them with out socks off duty. The Japanese off base thought they wear boat or scuba shoes.
>>34624066
Do they come in size 13?
>>34622692
The skinwalkers are at the printer.
Fuck.
>lower right