Sig P320 thread? Striker general? OHG offensive handgun general?

>get karambit
>it has a tiny blade

>>34566656
The entire gun is a compensator for your microphallus. Yuh dig?

>>34567360
LOL good one bro *high fives your asscheeks*

File: 21f.jpg (35KB, 600x568px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x568px

>>34566656
>offensive handgun

File: 15972391_10210317116077064_1002164795505972782_o-660x440.jpg (56KB, 660x440px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 660x440px

>>34567752
What's wrong?

>>34566656
This must be some kind of anti-advertisement. wtf i hate sigs now

300 threads later I still don't understand what makes an ordinary handgun into an offensive handgun. Equipping it for IPSC open division? Because that's what it looks like.

>>34566656
>offensive handgun
Yeah, it's offensive to the rest of us gun owners you feel the need to pay tacticool mall ninja.

File: roland special.jpg (159KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1000x667px

>>34568664
Compact/fullsize with weaponlight, muzzle device (silencer or comp), and optional MRDS and/or laser.
The original idea for the Mk 23 OHWS was to give operators a one-handed weapon that wouldn't be too much of a step down from an SMG.
The "offensive handgun" concept's spiritual successor is the "Roland Special", a Glock 19 with comp, light, and red dot that fits in a Glock 34 holster.

>>34568664
I typed up a flowery, hyperbolic response but >>34568972
responded first. I would add there is usually a sentiment to maximize bullet velocity by find a cartridges "sweet spot" for barrel length. For .45 this is 5"-6" and 9mm 5".

File: giphy-facebook_s.jpg (33KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x270px

>>34566656
>Mantis knife

>>34569262
Why is having massive lights part of offensive-tacticool-handgun? You'd think you want a weapon that doesn't have a delicate piece of equipment sticking an inch past the barrel. I should make some sort of brace that mutually supports the light and silencer while providing a monolithic aesthetic and a buffer of steel in front of the equipment to prevent damage. I'm sure it'd pick up.

>>34569323
It's a robust piece of equipment but it also acts as a standoff device. It's also bright as day and extremely effective

>>34569358
If it's a decent standoff device then it's okay. I just figured you wouldn't want a small flashlight as a standoff device.

>>34566656
>offensive handgun
>no MK23
too poor to get into the real offensive handgun game?

>>34569498
I almost asked if the Mark 23 was thicc enough to mill out for a red dot but then I remembered it's an H&K Mark 23. Someone needs to get on this, buy a Mark 23 every several years and update it to the modern fashion of meme.

>>34569498
>mk23
>dumped for Glock
JUST

File: Screenshot_2017-07-08-22-38-18.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>>34566666
Holy fuck. Nice get my dude.

>>34569323
>delicate piece of equipment
It's the current year; pistol lights are rugged as fuck.
Anything that would break an X300U would probably break the gun it was attached to, too.

Is it just me or does anybody else wish that there was a Roland special type gun chambered in the equivalent of 7.62 Tok Mag that would offer an extra couple hundred FPS and maybe an easily attachable stock option that wasn't fucking terrible?

>>34569729
It would be cool to have pistols for every good cartridge but there's a lot of things that would have to be wished for Tokarev before we can get to the step of Rolanding it.

>>34567818
>a literal switch
>compensator for 9mm
wtf

File: IMG_4748.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>34566656
Just finished this wayyy under budget so I thought I'd share since its "OGH" . Runs anything other than 115gr reliably. The whole is definitely greater than the sum of its parts.

>>34569861
edit: shouldnt have said "finished" considering I still need to install my sights and decide on a trigger

>>34569861
which slide is that?

Also, u gay for doing a Roland Special.

File: 20170716_131555(1)-1.jpg (1MB, 2104x1724px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2104x1724px

>>34566656
>OHG
I got this f a m

>>34569883
You can say its gay all you want until you spend some serious time shooting one.

and its the Suarez International 419 rmr cut

>>34569930
Why did you cheap out on the light?

>>34569809
It was the 90s, man.
You wouldn't understand.
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/01/23/special-forces-pistol-standard-issue-beretta-m9-evolved/

File: p938-1.jpg (317KB, 1123x665px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1123x665px

>P320 compact (not sub)
or
>P938
for 50% bedside defense and 50% LARPing around my house (practicing drawing etc until I'm old enough to CC in three years)

I prefer single stack a fuckton but the P320C is better for lefty, so it's kinda a trade off. Can small people even CC the P320C or is it too thicc? A slightly bigger Glock 42 is my comfort zone for refrence. Please weigh in.

PS: I'm going to shoot both tomorrow, I've held the P320C once and it was for like thirty seconds (don't remember it) so I expect to be pleasantly surprised tmrw

PS #2: I'm getting my fucking rosewood grips come hell or high water

>>34569930
>Suarez International
giving money to Gabe Suarez...
I wouldn't do that. The guy's SCUM.

>>34569935
got it for cheap, used to use it for work so I already have the pressure switch for it too. Definitely brighter than brighter than the surefire offering thought I havent had a chance to put it through its paces yet to determine how rugged it is. Other than a direct strike lens I dont see anything that would put this light out of commission.

>>34569966
I wouldn't say scum. Guy may be nuts but its a quality built

>>34569961
The 938 is a tiny 1911 with an 8 lb trigger.
The 320 is a doublestack plastic service auto.
They are completely different guns.
The 320C can absolutely be concealed if you're willing to dress around it and pay for a good holster and belt.
If you can't get a CCW permit for another three years, I can't imagine why the 938 would even be on your radar; for your applications the 320C would be a better choice in every possible way.

>>34569961
I've done a bit of research on single-stacks and the only truly ambi ones I've found that I would really consider are the Honor Guard (beware ugly) and the Beretta Nano , latter by virtue of not having a slide release at all. If you're only considering the two you mentioned, the P938 because the P320C is a full-sized gun called compact like the Glock 19.

>>34570029
Fun fact about honor guard: i know the owners, his nephew is my fraternity brother

>>34569729
The Chinese used to make a P226 clone in 7.62 tok for us in Canada

>>34570062
Cool, I remember reading they're a bunch of vets that decided to get into the business after they became civilians. It seems like it's made pretty hard and I like they're forward-thinking enough to figure out the future is with thin CC pistols rather than short CC pistols. I like the idea of having a compact-sized single-stack. Too bad about the etching being GRIP ZONE tier.

>>34569997
>Guy may be nuts
he committed worker comp fraud while employed by the police department. He threatened to kill multiple people.

Dude should be wiped from the face of this planet.

>>34570118
sparknotes me on the workers comp fraud

>>34570099
Personally im not a huge fan yet. I love the modularity and size but the trigger and bore axis make it difficult for me to get one.

>>34570193
he and his wife conspired to double dip into the government honey pot by claiming work injury comp while working a second job.

http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php?194769-Anyone-heard-of-gabe-suarez-Read-this-before-taking-defense-classes

Basically he's a SUPREME asshole.

>>34566666
my lord

>>34569961
p320c is concealable if you dress like hickok45. t-shirts show. shirts that fit properly show. I got a subcompact frame to carry in the summer.

File: IMG_20170623_144149.jpg (353KB, 1070x870px)

353KB, 1070x870px

>>34569961
Got both. The P938 to carry and the P320 because it's fuckin good and I use it in competition.
>only pic I have of them

>>34569425
You should have someone flash it in your face in a dark room. I wasn't convinced until a friend did it. Holy shit is it unpleasant.

>>34573690
Shield of light.
It also makes sights super crisp and easy to see where your aimimg

>>34566666
the paracord wrap on the finger ring really sends home the "this knife is shit" message.

File: image.jpg (279KB, 1024x830px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1024x830px

>>34566656
There's only one real "Offensive handgun" op.

File: IMG_20170625_215627[2].jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>34569861
>Runs anything other than 115gr reliably.
I have no issues with mine on any load so far. I've heard some have issues with 147 gr, but not even those are giving me trouble.

>The whole is definitely greater than the sum of its parts.
Yeah this thing is amazing. It fits glock 34 holsters, my time between shots are almost half of what other guys are doing and I'm more accurate while shooting as well. The RMR even lets me aim using NVGs, which I would have needed a laser before to do. Roland Special is really the future.

>>34568682
Red dots and lights make a lot of sense on a carry gun desu

>>34575420
>not having a laser and RMR

I really don't get the point of having a red dot.
Have any of you stood at 7 yards and shot at a silhouette target without aiming down the sights? Just raising your gun up to the target and firing and seeing where you hit?
I gurantee you'll be surprised how well you hit.
I know lots of people will go >lol 7 yards
But seriously. Most of us aren't going to be shooting much farther than that in a DEFENSIVE scenario.
I mean if you wanna play operator that's cool but don't pretend fancy toys make you a better shooter when if you're using the gun for real you're probably just fine with a stock Glock, plastic sights and all.

>>34579932
This isnt a defensive pistol general though

>>34579932
1. This isn't about defensive pistols.
2. A red dot allows you to focus on your target like your brain wants to and still have the precision of aimed fire. It's a huge benefit if you have the skills to use it properly.

>>34579944
The best offense is a good defense.

>>34579932

a red dot actually reveals a lot about your trigger control since you can see it move in real time with your good or not-so-good mechanics.

File: 0717172058.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>34566656
Think so

>>34580204
I was thinking of getting a comp for my P320 with a threaded barrel.

How does it attach? Does it just thread on?

>>34580258
Thread and set screw, but made this one. Not sure how the Springer Precision P320 one attaches, could just thread on.

>>34566656
Why 320 and not 226?

>>34580273
That's impressive. I didn't notice it wasn't the Springer Precision one until I read your post.

>>34566666
Oh fuck

>>34580296
Thanks - just a simple single port test version to get correct threading toolpath, the actual comp design is off the gun right now

>>34569540
More like

>dumped for hk45c

>>34566656
>Buy incredibly expensive handgun with a bunch of expensive accessories
>Buy knife at the fucking flee market

File: 20160507_192315.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Gonna post the same picture of my 320 as i always have

>>34580469
>p320
>incredibly expensive

Not that I would ever buy a p320 but they're as cheap as any of their competitors.

>>34580630
I guess I just wanted to use hyperbole. But It does have all of the expensive options.

>>34580204
DUDE PLEASE POST MORE PICS OF YOR SET UP

>>34569900

Hnnnnnnnnnggggg

Both need suppressors!

OHGs are a fucking meme. Red dots aren't any faster to pick up for quick first shots than irons, their advantage comes with target transitions and longer shots - neither of which make them worth ponying up the cash/ spending many hours of training.

Lights are a good idea but x300s are bulky and will add time to your draw. Compensators on 9mms are for fucking faggots and that's a fact.


If you're going on the "offensive" (god i feel like a retard just saying that), grab a carbine.


>also buying a ((cohen)) sig

You're the reason sig is trash now

>>34581147
lol he actually doesn't think that comped, red dot handguns are the future

>>34581244
Compensators add excess noise and flash for a cartridge that doesn't require any recoil reduction (it's a fucking 9mm!)

Red dots are a big expense for a reward that is not only unlikely to come in handy in most realist shooting situations but is also difficult to reap without lots of training. And you'd still need to train with irons as well since these slide mounted red dots have a way of not being on and ready to go when you need them. They also add quite a bit to the profile of the gun when carrying concealed


I know Ian likes them but it doesn't make them practical

File: IMG_20170610_145238_736.jpg (841KB, 1339x1280px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 1339x1280px

<3

File: 1481173017742.jpg (63KB, 553x585px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 553x585px

>>34581147
>>34581351
"I don't like this, stop doing it" the post.

2/10, have a (you).

>>34580278
P320 is striker fired, 15 + 1

Pretty solid pistol, no issues as of yet

>>34580693
NAH

>>34580630
$548 for my p320, NJ prices

>>34581351
Have you ever shot a compensated handgun?

File: image.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Just picked up my first Sig the other day. Can't wait to hit the range after work today

>>34582617
$454 in utah

>>34576298
>Red dots and lights make a lot of sense on a carry gun desu
No they don't.
>Need to illuminate a potential thread
>Have to muzzle sweep them with a loaded firearm in order to identify
Or
>Already identified threat
>Pull and shoot
Don't waste time turning on some light, if you're ready to pull, you better be at the point where you're pulling the trigger

You don't need to player operator on your way to the DMV or just outside the gas station. If you're ready to pull a gun, you're ready to shoot it. End of story. If for some reason things change and you don't need to pull that trigger, having a little fucking light on the bottom of your gun to fuck with is not a great game to play. If you haven't already ID'd a threat, doing so with a gun pointed at them isn't the way to do things.

>No matter what, ccing with a light is retarded
/thread

>>34582984
wrong

>>34582984
>if you're ready to pull a gun you're ready to shoot it
Wrong
Some guy in an alley is holding a knife 25 yards away and staring you down. Do you wait to draw until he's sprinting at you?
No because that's fucking stupid
Drawing your firearm is only a commitment to shoot when you're contact fighting.
>having a light on the bottom of your gun to fuck with is not a great game to play
No one is playing a game here, retard. The point of a WML is not to ID a target. It's meant to dazzle and disorient an attacker and give you better sight contrast, especially for people with non-tritium sights. Training to index your light switch on doesn't add any time to your draw.

>>34567752
Are you
>Offended

Is there anyone that actually thinks the P320 looks good? Or are people buying it just based on functionality/because the military picked it up?

>>34583007
Wrong
>>34583096
>Some guy in an alley is holding a knife 25 yards away and staring you down. Do you wait to draw until he's sprinting at you?
Not him, but if you already have an ID there's no need for a light. He has a knife, he's 25 yards away, he's moving towards you or has threatening body language. Draw and diffuse or draw and fire.
>but muh weapon mounted light
Nigga you're pointing a gun at someone. If they can see this, they aren't going to engage. If they start to reach for a gun or weapon you fire. A light isn't going to change any of that.
>What if I actually DO need to ID them
Then carry a pocket flashlight and use that with your gun, you're not sweeping indoors, you're going to be outdoors, in the open, at various ranges, in various settings. If it's too dark to ID someone, a light to ID the threat or person is better than muzzle sweeping some soccer mom that will make your life hell.
>dazzle and disorient
This is retarded. If you life in the city, there's nowhere you should be walking consciously that's going to be so poorly illuminated you cannot identify a threat. Why are you walking down dark alleys anyway? Situational awareness is a thing.

Even if you have a wml you still need a handheld. If you train to shoot with a light in one hand you'll severely cut down on bulk for the small chance you won't be able to ID the BG in self defense when not at home.

>>34583138
Looks sexy, prettier than a glawk. I I tend to shoot better with it.

It is definetly bulkier than G19, a bit heavier as well.

>>34583192
You're reaching pretty hard. You don't like lights. That's cool but stop trying to act as if your opinion is absolute truth.

>>34583192
Frankly this. Instead of fucking around with WMLs you niggers should be training to shoot while holding a flashlight.

>>34583345
Holy fuck you're butt blasted.

>>34583365
What if im using my offhand for something else?

>>34583192
>Then carry a pocket flashlight and use that with your gun
Your support hand is probably the most important hand for followup shots. without a support hand on your dun, you're going to have horrible accuracy relative to someone that has their hand free.
>This is retarded. If you life in the city, there's nowhere you should be walking consciously that's going to be so poorly illuminated you cannot identify a threat. Why are you walking down dark alleys anyway? Situational awareness is a thing.
Have you ever been blasted with an x300 or a TLR-1? I'm not talking on strobe, just continuous. You're either closing your eyes or looking a way. In anything short of full daylight or bright fluorescent office space, somebody's WML light will blind you long enough that any shots you take at them probably won't hit. If your attacker has a gun, that gives you valuable time to take them down.
>Even if you have a wml you still need a handheld
This is true. That said, if you're CCing, you can't draw properly with one hand full. Your support hand needs to clear the concealing clothing and holding a light rather than ditching it and switching to your WML as you draw means you won't fuck up your draw and catch your gun on your shirt.

>>34583365
By that same logic nobody should be mounting lights on their AR's because it's "too dangerous" and should train to hold a flashlight with their AR

>>34583427
Nope:
Your support hand helps but it is not the most important for controlling follow up shots. I carry a full size 9mm I can shoot one handed fairly quickly. Also, slightly slower follow up shots =/= less accurate.

>blind your attacker!
This is a meme cold and simple

>but you can't draw!
People don't cc maglites, it's easy to use your support hand to pinch your shirt even with a flashlight in your hand. Not to mention I use light jackets for concealment so my left hand isn't doing shit anyways.


Hey at least your wml will still be good for home defense!

>>34583473
Pointing a gun at someone inside your home to id =\= someone on the street.


You are also much, much more likely to need to scout around in the dark in your home than on your commute to your car.

>>34583427
>If your attacker has a gun, that gives you valuable time to take them down.
If my attacker has a gun, I'm not wasting time turning on a light, I'm drawing and firing. There's a reason I don't carry a single action "cocked and locked". I carry a DA with no safety. That's because I want to pull the trigger the moment my gun is on target. No safeties, no cocking, no extra steps, and certainly no fucking WML.
>>34583473
I didn't realize you conceal carried an AR. Must be hard, do you prison carry up your ass, or just run it down your pants leg and walk like a pirate?

>>34583504
>B-but muh blinding effect!!

>>34583365
>>34583192
this isn't the 1990s any more, grandpa. nowadays CCWs can have WMLs, cops carry with WMLs, everyone uses WMLs. We have the awesome ability to aim, illuminate and engage with only one hand

>>34583588
Cops have the need to investigate in the dark, abandoned drug houses, crime scenes, etc. The chance of needing to do so for a civilian in a self defense situation is so slim that it is much more efficient to just carry a flashlight. Stop trying to push your ninja fantasies on to every one else.

Also I loved that you used

>haha current year

as your argument

>>34583486
>>34583534
Stand in front of someone and have them shine a 600 lumen light in your eyes.
you're going to fucking shield your eyes

>>34583609
So when you engage a threat you're aiming your light at the threats face?

That's interesting, me personally I prefer to use the fucking sights.

>>34582607
Serious senpai. I'm thinking about doing this to me 320 when I get it

>>34583599
>ninja fantasies
You mean useful attachments?
It's far easier to draw and finger your WML on it one motion than scramble for a flashlight in your pocket while trying to draw. Nobody's arguing that handheld flashlights aren't useful but in a self-defense situation, the less you have in your hands, the better.
Literally the only argument against WML's is flagging people which is a completely moot argument when you practice proper TD. You're infinitely more likely to accidentally shoot a family member sweeping your house with an AR's single action trigger than you are with a DA/SA with a WML

There is zero arguments against carrying with a WML other than "waaaah it's too bulky"

>>34583619
SAS did previously train to use their wmls as jank lasers to good effect. If it's one less thing to shift focus to, all the better.

>>34583619
are you retarded
the light is attached to the gun
when you aim the gun at someone, the flashlight is aimed at them

part of the reason WMLs are useful is that they give you better sight contrast

>>34583634
Why not carry both?

That's what I do.

>>34583642
If your aiming at center mass then the lights not going to be flashing right in their eyes you dingus.

>>34583634
Why in the fuck would you need to draw at something you can't even see? How do you know it's a threat? Pointing your muzzle at someone even without your trigger on the finger is still flagging someone you stupid cunt.

>>34583658
Added expense and bulk for something whose practicality is incredibly questionable.

>>34583658
yeah, me too

there's nothing mallninja about having a WML

>>34583634
>running around your house looking for a threat

>safety off

Holy shit your stupid

>>34583670
The focus of the light isn't that tight.

>>34583672
Hey if you want to make your carry gun bulkier and harder to conceal, pay for some custom holster, and most likely add time to your draw then be my guest.

Just don't think your light gives you an appreciable advantage in any realistic shooting situation. The only time this last couple weeks where I couldn't ID a possible threat with complete clarity was when I was at the movies.

>>34583686
>running around with a round in the chamber and full mag
>not leaving your HD gun tactically unloaded so it doesn't magically shoot someone

>>34583696
At up close and personal distances (3 -5 yards and in) it's not going to fan out to his face. I have an x300u on my AR.

This thread makes me wish I didn't buy my 320c

>>34583714
Wow you're getting so butt blasted it's starting to affect your brain function.

Keep your safety engaged until your ready to shoot the target

>LOL wHy even haVe ur AR loded in the firSt place you fuCkinG faGGot?!?!?!!

>it's a "Fudds vs mallninjas" thread

>>34583634
>It's far easier to draw and finger your WML on it one motion than scramble for a flashlight in your pocket while trying to draw
That's the point of our argument. Why are you fingering your WML when you're already drawing? If you're drawing, you're drawing to fire, not to ID, and certainly not to "blind your attacker" like a dipshit. The only real argument in favor of WMLs is that in dimly lit areas you can properly ID an attacker, which is the entire fucking argument for using them for home defense. For concealed carry, that goes out the window, because if you haven't ID'd an attacker as an attacker, you shouldn't be reaching for your weapon.
>flagging people
Yes, brandishing a firearm at someone who wasn't a threat is a felony. That's why we are telling you to carry a flashlight, ID, then draw without the flashlight in your hands. You can drop the flashlight. If you can make out their silhouette after making out that they're a threat, you don't need to shine a light in their fucking face. You're at the point where you're about to take their life, you can just draw and shoot.
>>34583640
>SAS did previously train to use their wmls as jank lasers to good effect. If it's one less thing to shift focus to, all the better.
>SAS
Excuse me, but SAS isn't carrying for walking through Walmart, they're carrying to operate you dipshit. You're not operating. You're carrying in case someone tries to mug you or starts shooting up Walmart.

Honestly, it's like these morons think a WML turns their guns into toys. Draw and fire, not hard. WMLs are great for LEO, home defense at night, military operations, etc. They aren't great for concealed carry.

File: IMG_1782.jpg (20KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x360px

>>34583769
Ya hit the nail on the head

>>34583749
>Keep your safety engaged until your ready to shoot the target
My HD gun doesn't even have a safety... My AK does, sure, but you can bet that bitch is off if I'm at the point of sweeping my house with it. Either way, I'm against the WML guy. Dude's a moron, you don't need a WML to conceal carry. Extra steps = death.

File: IMG_1774.jpg (237KB, 824x1024px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 824x1024px

>>34583769
Stop trying to use logic with these faggots, this is a fucking offensive handgun thread after all.

>>34583784
Talking about ARs not HD guns in general. I don't blame you for not keeping your AK on safe, the safety is unergonomic and the triggers aren't usually as feather light as your average Gucci tacticool AR.

File: IMG_5652.jpg (20KB, 258x196px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 258x196px

Thoughts on getting a compact p320 and an XC1 maybe a/ an RMR for compact status and ultimate mobility?

>>34584594
This for concealed carry or as a range toy?

>>34584727
Concealed carry. I am a fairly mobile guy

>>34583713
I bet you would of liked a flashlight on your gun if something had happened at that theater, Mr. Lincoln

File: sig-p320-compact-comparison.jpg (834KB, 1200x686px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 1200x686px

>>34584827
If you can CC it, it will work fine
The P320 is rather bulky compared to other striker fired pistols, even in compact/subcompact form

>>34583632
It's a great setup, highly recommend it -you have any questions about parts or setup of it?

File: 0718171506.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>34583632
With the single port comp

>>34567818
Youre right
I'm offended by how bad that is

>>34586673
Do you have any reliability issues? Is this the standard tac ops compact threaded barrel?

any suggestions for a decent affordable laser/light?

>>34587613
None, have about 1500 through my comp design, not this one, no malfunctions, all with 115grn Remington UMC or 115 TulAmmo, and another 400 with assorted 124grn. With a similar single port version to this one you'll be fine for sure. Looking at the Springer Precision carry version, it should be able to run 115grn. The action on the P320 appears to respond really well to comps.

>>34587613
And yeah, standard threaded barrel, 13.5x1mm LH

File: 1498287280974.jpg (92KB, 751x960px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 751x960px

I can't decide between a steyr m9 or a p320 compact. Pls help

>>34588968
What do you want to do with it?

>>34588994
General purpose Ccw, practice. I already have a carry anywhere mouse gunn and will save the full size duty gun for later considering I can only Cary one with a jacket comfortably

I kinda want to get a .45 frame and a .40 slide and barrel and try to run 10mm through it

>>34589023
Can only give an opinion on the 320, but with the compact slide you can use the subcompact or full size frames, but since you already got the two ends of the spectrum, maybe the Steyr?

>>34589325
That is true. It will be more expensive to buy 3 guns than buy sign adaptions, but it will be more expensive in the long run to buy 3 guns and 2 versions of the 320. I don't know about the steyr as much either but it looks really ergonomic. The steyr however has that awesome trigger and caliber rainbow to choose from, so still conflicted

>>34584594
XC1 sucks

>>34588215
Handgun Weaponlight Buyer's Guide for /k/
https://pastebin.com/R6Hz3whk

>>34589379
Sig trigger is great too, if you do get the Sig, consider the small size frame, fits the hands better for me than the medium even though I have larger hands

>>34590095
Woops, meant sign trigger, don't know about steyr. Sig isnthe nicest trigger I've pulled aside from the 1911

>>34590108
Even better with the Apex Enhanced bow - doesn't change the seat or spring weights, cuts pull weight by 20% and cleans up the takeup

>>34566656
You're right OP, that handgun is pretty offensive.

>>34589379
One of the selling points of the P320 is the modular design. Once you get your serialized chassis, any grip/slide combo (in the same caliber group) can be made by ordering relatively cheap parts online.

Assuming you didn't know this. I bought a second grip module for mine to dick around with paints for ~$40.

File: 1432370071280.png (125KB, 576x347px)

125KB, 576x347px

when sig makes a better glock than glock

>>34582617
I got a p320 x-five for $680.

>>34583670
You've never used a weapon light, the post.

Diffusion and splash are a thing. Your arguments are garbage.

>>34583769
>The only real argument in favor of WMLs is that in dimly lit areas you can properly ID an attacker, which is the entire fucking argument for using them for home defense. For concealed carry, that goes out the window, because if you haven't ID'd an attacker as an attacker, you shouldn't be reaching for your weapon.

I can hear a dog growling or a bum negroing in the dark, know there's an issue, and have a need to defend myself without seeing where the threat is. Your argument is dumb and I hope it gets you killed as a warning to others.

>>34587129
>>34569809
>Doesn't appreciate 80s/90s tactical aesthetics

>>34582951
>>34582617
>>34593238
Meanwhile the same guns here cost 400 CHF/USD more...
>SIG
>Schweizerische Industrie Gesellschaft
>Schweizerische
>Ohlol let's almost double the price
I know there is SIG USA and so on, but come on
Also
>not on Hilfsmittelliste
>can't use it for Feldschiessen and general competition
>I shiggidy diggidy

>>34583138
I can't really get into the way it looks honestly, especially the full-size version. I mean I know that doesn't matter and it's still an excellent handgun, I just don't find it visually appealing.

File: P320 Subcompact mod.jpg (329KB, 1406x1168px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1406x1168px

>>34566656
Hey sigfags, I'm looking to making my own p320 custom build using a subcompact slide on a compact frame.

Would it be as easy as just filling off a 1/4 inch off the front rails like pic related?

>>34598917

Yes as I've done it for my particular p320 subcompact. I wanted a compact frame for a full grip when I take it to the range but can switch to the subcompact frame for concealed carry.

I used a dremel tool with a blade to cut then used sandpaper to smooth the ends out. I wish I had access to a table saw so I could cut both ends evenly but it's fine for my purposes. The pic you posted looks like they've used a dremel to grind the material at an angle to meet the picatinny rail. Mine was just a straight blunt cut with no angling.

>>34599043

Sweet, It doesn't seem like much to take off, so I think I'll play it safe and hand file it for an hour or so, and some sandpaper to clean up, thanks.

File: 400px-SOCOM.jpg (19KB, 400x159px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x159px

>>34568664
There's only one offensive handgun.
Accept no substitutes.

>>34599759
What about a .40 S&W Hi-Point with "THIS MACHINE KILLS NIGGERS" engraved in cursive on the slide, with 24k gold inlay?
That would be a pretty offensive handgun, wouldn't it?