http://www.dia.mil/Portals/27/Documents/News/Military%20Power%20Publications/Russia%20Military%20Power%20Report%202017.pdf
This btfo's the vatniks. It's not too late though, the Russians can still buy Chinese.
>>34476956
is american lie. do not believe.
>>34476991
Lies! Russia stronk!
>>34476956
Horrible OP, at least give some hints what the conclusion from the report is or something. There could be literally stated in the report that everything is okay with the russian military.
>>34477077
No conclusion. Only what they think the Russians are doing and what they might be doing.
Interesting remarks about their space shits.
Whatever the case is, all the superior firepower in the world means nothing if the Commander-in-Chief of said superior firepower is an insecure narcissist who you can jerk around as much as you please with flattery and cushy business deals for him and his children.
>>34477259
CTR pls go
>>34476956
>be russia
>have no military
>Hililary runs for president, finally wants to stand up to Putin
>hack the election so Putin's #1 buddy Trump gets elected
it all makes sense now
>>34476956
Without any jokes, quality of this report is very questionable.
>>34479135
In what way? don't want to start reading it if it's inaccurate as hell
>>34479198
Strange sources with close to zero references to experts, strange numbers in aviation, factional errors like on pic. It's all wiki-tier.
>>34479447
>where are the proofs?
>no, those are not real proofs!
Every time.
>>34479198
it's cheap agit-prop. grammatically poor, factually incorrect, politically charged. they dedicated more attention to election hackers and trolls on twitter than in-depth analysis of hardware, doctrine and combined arms exercises.
>>34479527
>admitting to not having read it
Vatniks gonna vatnik
>>34479527
oh, and apparently russian bases in crimea and belarus simply don't exist. just ignore it and maybe it'll go away.
>>34479553
There are shitton of airbases on the north
>>34479447
>Strange sources with close to zero references to experts
>661 Citations
You went through all of them? Very impressive.
Not to mention that it's the fucking DIA, which is its own source. The citations are just the publically accessible alternative to their word.
>>34479527
>grammatically poor
Someone who only learned English as a second language ought to be cautious about critiquing its grammar.
>factually incorrect
How would you know? You've never read it.
>politically charged
There is little to no politics involved in the report. It's quite dry. US intel in general is notably non-partisan.
>they dedicated more attention to election hackers and trolls
Information warfare is given brief mention (too brief, imo). Vast majority of the report remains on Russian conventional/nonconventional military. Damning evidence you've never gone through the document.
>>34479527
Why do you feel the need to lie?
>>34479702
>Someone who only learned English as a second language ought to be cautious about critiquing its grammar.
Like people with English as their first language has any better grasp of English grammar.
>>34477259
At this very moment you are just as bad as somebody from /pol/, because you too are bringing off topic, non-firearm politics in here.
kys
>>34479198
>most capable fighter
>MiG-29
lmao
>>34479504
Varnish: when will they learn?