Is there an American or international equivalent to the British

>>34425748
Army is "The Presidents 100".

>>34425808
trolling this hard.
>>34425748
American equivalent would be "The Old Guard"

>>34425833
Thanks, anon. Do their ceremonial battalions also rotate roles with the combat battalions, making sure everyone sees combat?

>>34425748
>Most of what the British guards do is ceremonial, but they also work as regular infantry

Bearing in mind you have five regiments of Guards (Grenadiers, Coldstreamers, Irish, Scots and Welsh), each with 1-2 battalions and there only ever being one company from one battalion on public duties (unless there is a specific event on), I'd say 'regular infantry' is the mainstay of their role.

File: 2496568713_8301866010.jpg (216KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 500x371px

>>34425748
Malaysia
1 RAMD

>>34425748
I'm imagine the US marines you see at the white house fill this role.

File: wachbattailon.jpg (358KB, 1920x1278px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1920x1278px

In Germany it's the Wachbattaillon

>>34425856
>Do their ceremonial battalions also rotate roles with the combat battalions, making sure everyone sees combat?
here, just read this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3rd_U.S._Infantry_Regiment_(The_Old_Guard)
pls remember the Regimental system the US Army uses, is different from the one the UK uses.

I know every branch of the US military have their own units dedicated to ceremonial services. The most prolific being the US Army 3rd Regiment Old Guard and the US Marines Honor Guard.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (222KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1920x1080px

Pretty sure any British regiment can perform ceremonial guard duty