AR thread/AR General/ARG

>>34416789
What's that from?

>>34416789
Holy shit thats ugly

File: 45674568.png (314KB, 634x356px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 634x356px

What are the best 4th of July deals on scopes? I have none at the moment just the iron sights. Trying to stay below $500

>>34416811
What type of scope do you want you dumbass

File: 1490457081291.jpg (130KB, 1280x1440px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1280x1440px

>>34416829
3xish

File: spendwisely.jpg (359KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1280x720px

Posting constructively and on-topic!

>>34416843
Have you thought about a 1-4x?

>>34416853
Anything that lets me see further then just the iron sights really.

File: 20161129_210703.jpg (495KB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 3264x1836px

Are CETME STANAGs any good?

Steel so I imagine they would be stronger and more durable but I'm not sure.

>>34416843

Here ya go, Skeeter.

http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-3x-compact-prism-scope-w-the-patented-acss-5-56-reticle-pac3x-acss-5-56

Or this if you want to spend a little more. Botach might have a good deal on it.

http://www.opticsplanet.com/steiner-m332-prism-3x32mm-riflescopes.html

>>34416848
No thanks

File: 20170503_093119 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>geissele package still hasn't moved
come the fuck on, this is ridiculous

>zeroing an old aimpoint
>cant figure out where I am hitting
>realize I was adjusting the up/down and right/left turrets backwards

Learn from my mistakes.

>>34416886
So have you realized that SOPMOD stocks are trash?

>>34416886
It won't until monday.

>>34416860
http://www.opticsplanet.com/vortex-viper-pst-1-4x24-riflescope.html

This and a scope mount

>>34416898
should have moved on thursday and friday

>>34416914
FedEx?

>>34416914
If it hasn't by now, then it won't until monday.You'll get it I'll say Wednesday or Thursday.

>>34416922
ups mail innovations

>>34416932
ups a shit

File: DSC00926.jpg (560KB, 1783x999px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 1783x999px

>buying anything but aimpoint or eotech
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5zgsq2kq6jri8bd/Red%20Dot%20Test%20Report%20.pdf?dl=0

File: range time.jpg (2MB, 1377x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1377x2448px

>>34416789
at that point why even live?

>>34416932
Then Thursday or Friday.

>>34416937
agreed usps priority is the best for my location

>>34416912
>>34416864
Thanks for the suggestions. I've been seeing a lot of people suggesting with the primary arms 3x or the vortex spitfire 3x. Which would you say is the superior product?

>>34416940
My holosun will shit on any EOShit

File: 20160509_181804.jpg (3MB, 3556x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3556x2000px

>>34416953

It's probably a wash between them in terms of quality. Some people like Vortex warranty more. I am mostly just a whore for PA.

>>34416953
Get a 1-4x. You can use it for CQB and long range

>>34416940
MRO is garand daddy approved.

>>34416953
Steiner M332, it's actually military grade.

Between those 2, the PA is superior because it can use ACOG mounts.

>>34416932
That usually works well for me. I've watched FedEx receive my package locally, then ship it 100 miles up to the neighboring state, sort it, and send it back. Top retards.

>>34416956
name one group that uses the holosun, LEO or MIL.

File: IMG_5325.jpg (78KB, 460x810px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 460x810px

>>34416800
It was used in the New York hospital shooting. Apparently it is a military grade M16.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40466866

File: You_Doodle_2017-06-21T14_29_01Z.jpg (839KB, 1256x740px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 1256x740px

>>34416940
>Not having an ACOG

Shiggy

Looking for a .30 cal suppressor primarily to sit on a 10.5 inch pistol. .300 BLK super, subs, and 5.56. Maybe .308 out of a 16+ inch barrel eventually. I'm between three options. Silencerco Omega, Rugged Surge 7.62, and Dead Air Sandman S. Opinions?

>>34416965
You can mount a red dot on top of a prism scope and use it the same way.

File: 20160525_152346.jpg (2MB, 3201x1801px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3201x1801px

>>34416968

Using an ACOG mount is important for pretending to be cool.

File: 20170629_134856.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>34416966
I love mine.

File: DSC03629.jpg (637KB, 1815x1019px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 1815x1019px

>>34416966
>14 MOA of deviation
pass.
>>34416978
ACOGs are life.
I need to track down another ECOS

>>34416980
If you want your scope to weigh a shit ton.

>>34416983
Get your poor fag optic out of here.

File: rumplyblanket.jpg (1MB, 3000x2374px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2374px

>>34417009

I'm the champion of poorfag optics.

>>34417001
Variables are usually heavier than prism scopes, if anything it would make them more even.

>>34416979
I'm in the same boat and concluded the way to go is the sico omega with the dead air kymo attachment

>>34417016
Where's your battle sheathe for your wacky bat?

File: 1482129927424.jpg (69KB, 765x1024px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 765x1024px

>>34416964
>>34416968

If I am not ready to whack my front A2 sight off is it still possible to mount a scope with a taller riser or is there a trick to co-witnessing a 3x? I'm still new to all this.

>>34417044
They will already be co-witnessed

>>34416996
You know a lot of those instructors are sponsored by or associated with big names like Glock and Aimpoint right? They get perks and free shit for promoting their products.

>>34417044
You don't need to remove your front sight or get a riser you fucking noob,

>>34417056
>>34417062
Alright I'm sold for PA 3x.

Last question, how much am I going to get bullied if I post it here with a $260 scope?

>>34417072
Get the Steiner if you're worried about getting bullied.

>>34417062
Shhh don't talk to the midget. Eotech has been BTFO and he's /gq/ so money in gear=battle experience.

>>34417072
Who cares most of the fags here post their parents guns or are in debt like giddy.

>>34417077
>like giddy.
stop it, i'm a one of a kind trip

>>34417076
eotech isn't btfo, it displayed the LEAST deviation via parallax in the test...

>>34417082
No there is other fags here who are in debt

>>34417087
but not like me

File: 19488903_1507246072648311_1301399372493048937_o.jpg (220KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 2048x1365px

>>34417062
>>34417076
read the report and make your own conclusions then based off your own testing.

>>34417090
I trust military studies over testing done by a commercial entity.

>>34417021
That's actually a solid idea I hadn't considered.

File: FTYplvp.jpg (269KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 2048x1365px

>>34417105
yet military studies initially proved the Eotech to be reliable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>34416895

w-whats bad about them....?

>>34417123
he has a tiny face

File: IMG_0357.jpg (2MB, 3707x2256px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3707x2256px

>>34417123
anon doesnt like them

>>34417125

I have a big face and beard. Is it the meme for me lads?

File: 20160213_015829.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>34417035

*shrugs*

>>34417044

Just use a regular mount, the front sight post will be way out of focus.

>>34417128
File your paperwork

File: 2017-07-01 12.48.13.jpg (2MB, 1499x910px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1499x910px

>midday on a beautiful Saturday
>not being at the range
>not shooting at 8000 feet

>>34417152
Why would you get your guns all dirty like that?

>>34417152
What a fag

File: shoopshoop3.png (4MB, 2052x1050px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2052x1050px

>>34417144
muh ballistics

>>34417152
Does your dad know you put his guns in the mud?

File: IMG_0375.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>34417179
thats not sigbro

File: IMAG0497_1.jpg (101KB, 720x1245px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 720x1245px

I haven't been in the AR game for a while (since around the time the URX II came out). Been mostly messing around with M1A and AK's. I gave my block 1 clone and recce-ish build to my dad several years ago...and he didn't raise no Indian giver. I was going through some old parts boxes and found a bcg, buffer, matech, lpk, etc so I figured why not and ordered a lower and an upper that psa had on sale.

What are some decent triggers? Would like a decent single stage probably. I've only ever used mil-spec and kac 2-stage.

File: psi short.png (3MB, 2052x1050px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2052x1050px

>>34417169

File: 18700090_1673556619606568_923933454807767129_n.jpg (80KB, 882x960px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 882x960px

>>34417201
put your trip on wgws

File: 1495081289376.jpg (122KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 800x800px

Do I need a kill flash?

>>34416737
>>34416732

I like it just fine. But there are better options out there. Things I'd much rather have

Anybody have a C-more sight on their Aar? Kinda wanted to put one or the like on my SBR. Currently have an ACOG on it.

>>34417222
I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about bro

File: mk18mod3.png (2MB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x900px

>>34417090
That test BTFO'd the Aimpoint T-1 hard.

File: PSI M4.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>34417193

File: mod3b.png (2MB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x900px

>>34416966
There are some very serious findings regarding parallax and the MRO that has me seriously questioning that optic.

File: DSC04001.jpg (871KB, 2210x1241px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 2210x1241px

>>34417243
honestly I was surprised to see fucking 9 MOA deviation with the T1 I don't know what to believe in anymore.
I'd be curious to see you try a similar test and report your findings.

File: DSC_1117.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>34417243
explain

File: IMG_0448.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>34417243
also shows the improvements of the T2 are understated

>>34416940
Can someone tldr?

File: vlcsnap-2017-06-29-14h36m13s312.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>34417273
A recent test referenced by Skeletor by Green Eye Tactical had many different optics with multiples of each. Essentially every optic outside of the eotech EXPS 3-0 / 3-2 had enormous amounts of deviation when viewed slightly off center. MRO was horrendous and the T-1 was between 3-9 MOA. Worst part was it didn't get any better at distance. The smaller optics consistently had problems.

the eotech fucking crushed that test. With very little deviation

>>34417267
I look at it like this. The MRO is the only dot that doesn't starburst on me, so either more evidence comes out and I give up on dots or I keep it because no one here will use their equipment in actual combat.

>>34417276
Oh absolutely no doubt the T-2 was getting closer to the eotech with deviations of between 1-5 moa depending. Not bad at all. But the eotech was a huge surprise.

>>34417295
>MRO was horrendous
Strangely enough I had already figured that out on mine and wanted to go with a lower mount and move it more forward. Basically to where I'd see the dot when the rifle was squared up.

File: 1498835054678.jpg (67KB, 634x651px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 634x651px

>want to get an optic
>the Gucci shit everyone was dickbeating over is a meme
>except for the gucciest in the land
I'll stick to irons I guess.

File: DSC_1105.jpg (911KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

911KB, 1800x1200px

>>34417295
oh so EOtech is GOAT now
aimpoint BTFO'd

hell yes, new ARG memes

>>34417299
that holographic projection is good for something.

this will make for some interesting thermal drift vs. muh parallax shitposting

>>34417295
Sheeeeeiit

Makes me think about getting an Eotech again for block II

>>34417309
no doubt a good solution, and opposite of what people did at first with having the MRO as far back a possible.

>>34417314
lol, truth is stranger than fiction.

>>34417315
apparently so. If I'm not mistaken the thermal drift has been solves since 2014 on the eotech.

Alright gentlemen, gotta hop off. Heading to the gym. Also if anyone wants to sell me a EOtech email me at [email protected]

tfw, aimpoint t-1 btfo

>>34417315
>>34417314
I think it's honestly time to buy one of every fucking optic and everytime something gets BTFO you can switch to the new thing until it gets BTFO.

File: DSC_1067.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>34417322
i mean yeah, you don't?

File: IMG_0364.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>34417319
>the thermal drift has been solves since 2014 on the eotech.
so i've heard, it was a shame that a michigan company was involved in a scandal to the degree of the thermal drift lawsuit. we dont have a lot here outside of trijicon and eotech... they may have just redeemed themselves

>>34417320
sell t1 now before the normies catch wind

File: DSC_0725.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

posted for reasons

File: tldr.png (96KB, 619x1207px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 619x1207px

>>34417292
Eotech has the least amount of parallax issues from this test.

still, thermal drift wasnt covered.

not pictured is the Primary arms dots which have 14 MOA deviation.

>>34417330
Where's your elcan for when Acog gets BTFO

>>34417315
>thermal drift vs. muh parallax shitposting
i can move my face but i can't move the weather.

aimpoint>eoshit

>>34416863
they're actually pretty shit
the main reason the cetme was such a failure was because the magazines they used had the same problems as the first generation 30 round m16 stanags

File: snip snappers.jpg (2MB, 2700x1800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2700x1800px

Buying up all T1s, MROs, EOTechs, RMRs, ACOGs and other trash optics for $15 apiece. Include the word "BTFO" in the subject line of emails for quicker reply.

Thank you.

Also post ARs.

>>34417343
Shit, wish they would have done a test on the PRO. But the M2 appears to have done decent.

File: DSC_0987.jpg (536KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 1800x1200px

>>34417344
maybe sometime

>>34417351
only the T1 was fucked anyways, T2 performed well

MRO unequivocally btfo tho

File: You_Doodle_2017-05-25T15_46_43Z.jpg (4MB, 2177x1582px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2177x1582px

>>34417344
ACOG won't get BTFO

>>34417364
eotech confirmed goat msrp for exps3.2 now $1400, good luck burto

>>34417369
did they test the pro or m4?

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-01 at 4.29.23 PM.png (958KB, 2328x1394px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 2328x1394px

>>34417375
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5zgsq2kq6jri8bd/Red%20Dot%20Test%20Report%20.pdf?dl=0

looks like they compiled data from multiple tests

>>34417375
>>34417369
i just read this >>34417343


so they got the opposite results of what every single manufacturer stated, interesting.

i think their testing may be flawed

File: darkie 14.5.jpg (222KB, 822x2091px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 822x2091px

>move MRO forward since I'd already experienced the shift
>problem not solved but lessened
>no anon that's dumb move it back

File: IMG_6511.jpg (3MB, 2446x3062px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2446x3062px

>>34417391
Well I guess I'm getting an Eotech now

>eotech states 13moa shift
>we got 1moa

>everyone else states very low to no shift
>we got a fuck tonne

maybe they measured it backwards

>>34417412
pay debts

>>34417411
To bad you can't buy friends
>>34417412
Maybe they were paid. Maybe they're idiots.

>>34417412
Could also be a shill test paid for by Eotech

>>34417392
its only one test with a small sample size, but it is interesting. maybe someone else will try again more scientifically

File: DSC_1130.jpg (586KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1800x1200px

>>34417418
you can buy cats

>>34417426
Nice black panther

>>34417426
You can buy them, but you don't own them.

>>34417420
>>34417418
i doubt they're shills

>>34417421
it just seems weird that they got they exact opposite of what the manufacturers state.

it could be 100% legit but i don't know, not gonna be a deciding factor for me unless it can be replicated bu others

>>34417444
Nice 3 4s dude

>>34417450
Its interesting because another large instructor recently banned T-1's due to parralax issues a couple months back

>>34417462
pretty sure its the same instructor.

>>34417426
That's a big pussy.

>>34417412
Yea, something weird is going on. EOtech is the only company benefiting from this.

>>34417412
>maybe they measured it backwards

oh noo my cognitive dissonance is too much for me to handle!

read the report, they didn't measure it backwards. EOtech stands out because it uses a completely different technology to display the reticle. All the others use the same rehashed idea.

>>34417527
>they didn't measure it backwards
it was a joke

>>34417527
L3 pls leave

>>34417313

holosun

:^)

File: GetImage.jpg (37KB, 943x450px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 943x450px

If you ask me, RMRs, T1s, T2s, ACOGs, M68s, EOtechs have all been killing baddies for a very long time. Any of them probably work fine for basically 99% of ARG.

Use whatever the fuck you want, as long as you're using it.

Also, I kind of want one of these stupid ALG mounts. For, whatever.

>>34417549
I'm not L3, just an EOtech owner.

I mean come on, the rest of them use reflected-LED-onto-glass technology so they share the limitations of that technology. This is going ot manifest in similar results.

EOtechs use a hologram and lasers and shit so they're quite a bit different. I'm not saying they're better (my EOtech is suffering from delamination and I'm quite put off by them) but if there were other 'holographic' sights in the test it would probably corroborate what i'm saying.

If I recall burris had a holo sight that was basically an eotech without the metal shroud right? And vortex just released the UH-1 not so long ago. It would be nice to see those included in a future test.

With all this recent meme posting, what is the best optic made in the US

I'll consider anything really, ideally something not over a grand

>>34417655
Leupold prolly

>>34417655

Whatever the fuck you like

>>34417667
LCO got btfo'd in that test

File: amk and ar.png (1MB, 550x1082px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 550x1082px

>>34416789
Background check delayed on new ar. Can't get it till thursday, can't use it on 4th of July. feels bad.

>>34417619
did you accept the thermal drift tests too? those had a small sample size

>>34417607
Get it

>>34417399
What shift?

>>34417677
yeah, i saw that. i guess i was thinking scopes because he said "optic"

leupold scopes are pretty good from what i gather

>>34417728
what are you talking about? just because I'm an eotech owner doesn't mean i think they're flawless.. i don't accept any test without critical thinking...

What is the smallest damned eotech? They all seem so massive

>>34417792
that doesnt answer my question

File: IMG_20170531_025319201.jpg (4MB, 4608x2592px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4608x2592px

Everyone here bitching about their overpriced optic and Im sitting here with my bushnell trs25

File: Screenshot_20170701-153317.jpg (285KB, 1018x993px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1018x993px

>>34416940
>totally not biased guys
>one tester literally shits on MRO while the others find standard deviation

Really microwaves the ol oatmeal.

>>34416789
Tried clearing my house with irons, RDS and LPV. Conclusion: Offset sights would be the fastest and most ergonomic (in theory since I don't have them yet).
Best to worst:
>off-set RDS (in theory)
>RDS
>Irons
>Piggyback RDS or Irons (in theory)
>LPV on 1x
Other observations. A light weight carbine is most ideal, barrel length doesn't matter too much if you have a collapsible stock. A canted rifle while moving and shooting is the fastest and smoothest. Second best would be modern shooting stance of C-clamp type grip plus a more squared up shooting stance (very smooth, good for fast pace, violent team clearing, or solo aggro). Third best is a more traditional and dynamic style where you clear corners slowly with a more bladed stance (better if you are alone or no longer have theelement of surprise).
Share your home cqb oper8ting experience.

>>34417888
i noticed that too, tester #1 hated everything >>34417391

>>34417888
>>34417903
This is why /gq/ needs to stay in /gq/. They're just looking for excuses to buy more shit.

>>34417834
lol poor fag

File: IMG_0376.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

>>34417930
still an interesting "study" would like to see someone expand on this with a larger sample

>>34417933
Pls no bully.

>>34417947
The real question is how often is this noticeable if you have a proper sight picture? I don't know about you but I'm not pushing the dot all the way to the edges of the fov when I'm shooting.

>>34417901
Is this pasta?

>>34417947
I want someone to buy me all this shit so I can play with it myself.
>>34417974
And this. Square the gun up right in the first place and you won't have problems.

>>34417974
more notably is that parallax was perceived not recorded by POI shift

>>34418021
No thie is 4chan

File: test.jpg (765KB, 2592x2528px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 2592x2528px

Wait! The test was performed using people?

wtf?!?!

why not a rifle strapped to a rest and something like a camera to keep the focal point consistent?

use the camera to move the dot from edge to edge like pic, shoot 10, move to other edge and shoot 10, ect.

>>34418046
No, this is Patrick.

>>34417825
>i don't accept any test without critical thinking

yes it does answer your question you fucking autist.

>>34418069
>did you accept the thermal drift tests too?
>muh critical thinking
>n-not flawless
>u-ur autistic
at least i can be objective without losing my temper on 4chan kek

>>34418044
That should have been how it was done, also the Mexican >>34418065
brings up a great point.

Observed parallax but no information on actual poi shift means this whole thing was a waste of time.

>>34418065
See>>34417062

It was a rigged test.

File: DSC_1102.jpg (884KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 1800x1200px

>all of these poverty aimpoint owners in damage control

>>34418021
No. But it could be if you want. You've never cleared your house?

>>34418115
Should be a Meprolight instead.

>>34418115
>Anti Aimpoint meming is a thing now

What a time to be alive.

>>34416886
Maybe you have a reason for this, but it looks like your front sight is on backwards.

>>34418065
Hey Gibby what cans do you have?

>inb4 Burt and C-more shitposting

>>34418153
Not him, but it saves rail space and it doesn't really matter which way you place it.

>>34418085
congratulations you've done absolutely nothing

File: XV7uoSb.jpg (70KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1000x563px

>Waiting to get a red dot and than throwing some rounds down range

Really need a 20rd mag for this small package though

I wanna watch a movie.

>>34418180
No get a 60 round coffin mag.

>>34418180
How much did you pay for that abortion?

>>34418184
so watch a movie

>>34418184
Dont watch john wick that movie was shit

>>34418209
I am.
>>34418210
I picked Sicario

File: 1498942991575.jpg (65KB, 411x412px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 411x412px

>>34418202
Its custom built

All magpul parts

Paid $999

>>34418172
oh it's retarded

>>34418231
oh no

>>34418231
you better be joking

>>34418245
I have the money

Custom built, life time warranty

Going to SBR it

Good trigger, barrel is legit. Time to SBR and drop a can on it

Built on quality parts

File: cacklingwhores.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>34418231
So what red dot are you getting, anon?

>>34418253
>Custom built, life time warranty
>warranty
So you didn't actually build it?

>>34418253
>Built on quality parts
>keymod

>>34418275
You don't like BCM stuff?

File: DSC_3765.jpg (1MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1333px

>>34418130
oh boy
i have one of those too

>>34418236
>asks if i believe test
>i say no, i don't belive tests outright
>U DIDNT ANSWER MY QUESTION
>HURR DURR

carry on embarassing yourself

>>34418295
oh no, delete this.

>>34417135
Is that Gorgtech I spy?

>>34418295
Looks cool

>>34418307
I hope it becomes the new hotness I want one

>>34418180
unless you are carrying that thing with you often, I dont see why you would want to limit yourself to 10 less rounds. Truck and Home Defense guns should never be neutered in such a way.

>>34418307
>Hartman MH1
Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1Hartman MH1

Since Gibby didnt reply anyone know what brand of cans he owns?

File: test 2.jpg (193KB, 1872x1672px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1872x1672px

tried again
it'll be easier to try at the range and actually shoot.

>>34418411
surefire

>>34418411
SureFire

>>34418418
Are they any good?

File: yotsuba question full.jpg (59KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 380x380px

Does the battle rifle general still exist? I don't come here often, and I haven't been able to find it in the catalog in the last few days.
I ask here because I know some of you post in those threads too.

>>34418445
Nope. It seems all general threads are dying and aids summer threads are growing

>>34418435
good enough TIER 1 SOCOM OPER8RS

>>34416789
Ny safe act btfo

>>34418455
That's unfortunate. I have some CETME questions and I doubt a thread on it's own would attract enough attention.

>>34418468
>I have some CETME questions
ask away

>>34418468
Yeah it sucks that all the new fags are ruining 4chans /k/. Maybe /8/chans /k/ will have a /brg/ you should check.

>>34418065
I don't understand. Why do you need to shoot at all? Doesn't that pic alone demonstrate the parallax issue

>>34418503
parallax claims are at 100yds

>>34418479
I have an old ass CETME (St.Albans era) that I got used from a buddy. He told me about this issue before I took it.
The problem is that the receiver and the buttstock cap do not line up properly. If I put one of the pins into place, it is visibly crooked. They have to be knocked in with a mallet in order to reassemble the gun.
What can I do about that? The holes in the receiver and the holes in the end cap are appropriately sized, but it seems like the ones in the receiver are drilled like 2mm off spec or something.

>Century

File: 1493016327377.gif (466KB, 279x281px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 279x281px

>tfw "no thanks"-anon responds to me regularly

File: IMG_0614.jpg (130KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1024x683px

I bet you fags aren't even comfy

>>34416886
yeah and my camlock studs aren't moving either

>>34418515
Fill that faggot with Jb weld , let it set then put the parts together and re-drill it?

>>34418515
>>34418561
or drill it out bigger and use a bigger pin...

Help me guys I keep on spending to much money on AR parts.

>>34418517
I try.

>>34418549
I'm sitting in my lay-z-boy with /arg/ on my left and Sicario on the tube. Got a drink next to me and my basic bitch AR in my lap. Traffic is terrible so fuck going outside.

>>34418561
I was considering just using a dremel to take off the small amount of metal that's in the way or something. If I can find some spare pins (they don't seem to sell the right ones on apex) then I could probably just grind down one side of the pin so they'd fit.
I'm hesitant to do any gunsmithing since I have almost zero experience with metalworking.

File: IMG_20170630_190730.jpg (1MB, 2323x2302px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2323x2302px

>>34418549
>Sitting on deck
>Smoking a cigar (Angels Anvil)
>Put 300 rounds through the mk23 an hour ago
>Dog sitting next to me
>75°

I am decidedly comfy

>>34418601
Post doggo

>>34418583
Me either my suggestion was a wild guess

File: P_20170701_190143.jpg (2MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2340px

>>34418540
What vfg should I get? Should I get it in black or FDE?

also r8

File: IMG_20161117_141658006.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>34418607

>>34418618
9/10

What scope is that?

File: denial.jpg (295KB, 800x1422px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 800x1422px

>>34418618
Not Tangodown

>>34418628
Fucking todd

>>34417655
Budget?

>>34418680
He quite literally gave a budget

File: IMG_2869.jpg (67KB, 807x536px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 807x536px

Why does /arg/ hate BCM stocks?

>>34418693
It doesn't look amazing, that is all

File: reticle1x.jpg (347KB, 1490x1413px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1490x1413px

>>34418627
SWFA SS 1-4x

only weighs 14oz and has 5" eye relief

>>34418693
GT loves his.

>>34418721
GT is a fag

>>34418708
How do you like it?

>>34418693
uggo

>>34418728
No u

File: P_20170514_121213_HDR.jpg (973KB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 4160x2340px

>>34418737
Love it, only complaint is the illumination sucks in daylight.

>>34417901
Don't even look down the sight.

The longest you're going to be shooting in your house is like what? Maybe 20-30ft? Just shoot from the shoulder but with eyes down range

>>34418769
Yeah thats most 1-4x scopes with illumination the illumination sucks in day light.

Debating pulling the trigger on a 308 AR build for the 4th of jewly sales.

Should I do it?

File: IMG_20170630_190700.jpg (975KB, 3315x1308px) Image search: [Google]

975KB, 3315x1308px

>>34418855
Most magnified optics in general have shit awful daylight illumination. There are exceptions

>>34418862
There are a few for sale.
Rainier has the maten on sale

>>34418862
Sure

Fucking Kate. More AR Mexican shooting action.

>>34417947

What ambi selector

Oh I'm gonna be a slut and bring a paid cartel cop back and fuck him while he strangles me.

Don't get in the bank
Go in the bank.
Get strangled.

>>34418771
Try going up the stairs. Or tight spaces. Small targets. You need sights.

>>34418896
Olt

>>34418896
KAC

>>34418885
Don't tell me what to do faggot!

>>34418964
K

>>34418914
No, no I don't. I don't have stairs. Plus I'd clear my house with a 6" 9mm pdw so tight spaces are easy

>>34419057
>9mm pdw

>>34419075
>I'm too poor to own one

File: pint size poppers.jpg (2MB, 2200x1467px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2200x1467px

Boring.

Giddy, do something stupid.

File: Screenshot_20170316-222943.png (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>spent 5 grand on furniture instead of guns

Fuck.

>>34419149
I think the jews got Gibby

File: nice.jpg (104KB, 1596x896px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1596x896px

>>34419149

I just found out MROs are 1.05x

>>34418917
>>34418923
>>34418896
Colt

>>34419142
>9mm
>pdw

File: 1498768632841.png (143KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 800x1000px

>>34419179

>Botach

>>34419210
Gay. Also Sicario is pretty shit and women ruin everything. Also go file your paperwork.

>>34419226
No to all

File: 1271387050587.jpg (35KB, 650x450px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x450px

>>34419179
>botach
You never disappoint.

>>34419231
The gunplay is good and Alejandro killing that dude was good. Emily Blunt is terrible. Go file your paperwork.

>>34419243
Burt lose weight.

>>34419220
>>34419243
i've never had a problem with them

>>34419179
shit laser

Apocalypse Now old or Redux?

>>34419268
Das boot directors cut

File: reflex.jpg (32KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x360px

>>34418286
How do you like it?
Awkward for the gun?
Looking at getting the trijicon reflex and these seem similar.

>>34419288
Nazi get out.

>>34419304
shit taste kys

>>34419311
I don't wanna pay money to watch it. It's not on my Prime movie list.

>>34419326
>he doesn't torrent

What Steam summer sale games to get?

File: IMG_2180.jpg (3MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2448x3264px

>>34416789
Hey yo, patch fag here. I'm trying to get in contact with D60, does anyone here happen to have his email?

>>34419336
>being a thief
Go file your paperwork, criminal scum.

>>34419351
wow you're even more of a fgt pb clone than I thought

>>34419384
Lol does he actually say that?

>>34419384
Wanna watch a Michael Moore movie? That fat fuck is up at Torch Lake again this summer.

>>34419257
Same I dont get why people hate on botach

>>34419211
>for clearing your house against an intruder

Literally the best tool

>>34418311

Nah. I have one of his blues though. I build all my own stuff normally.

Good guy though. He rocked it in the Thunderdome.

File: IMG_3123.jpg (74KB, 640x611px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x611px

Is the VLTOR MUR really worth the meme bucks? I sorta like the aesthetic

>>34419483
Nothing is worth the money. You better be a thief and criminal like Psi and steal it.

What light should I get for under $100?

>>34419493
Maglight and duct tape, or buy 100 bucks in lotto tickets and go from there.

Fuck it, I'll watch An American Werewolf in London.

>>34419483

Depends.

I like mine. It's a well built piece of equipment, and adds some bling. Doesn't work with some rail systems because of how it's cut.

Supposedly it adds rigidity to the upper for better accuracy, but I can't back that claim up.

>>34419517

Warren Zevon was a pretty weird guy.

Mark 23 such a powerful handgun that it literally broke my pants today.
>>34416863
They suck

>>34419493
Streamlight pro tac rail mount, or buy a Surefire M951 or M952 on ebay

>>34419532
Good music though.

>>34419517
Watch the Wicker Man

>>34419571
Too late.

>>34419483
>they even make her thicc as a chibi
I'm calling interpol

>>34419646
Goddamn weeb

>>34419646
Weebs need to burn in nuclear hellfire.

>>34419646
FA plos

>>34419530
Any idea if it's incompatible with the DD or C4 FSP cutout rails

File: 1482710929935.jpg (25KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x480px

>>34419646
WEEB! KYS

You ever talk to a corpse? It's boring.

>>34419754
>>34419723
>>34419704
Not a weeb
>>34419755
sounds more interesting than talking to oneself

>>34419646
A2 needs to put you down on your next range trip.

>>34419763
He missed the opportunity today, and now I have an Acog so it's going to be that much harder for him.

>>34419761
American Werewolf in London. Good movie, go watch it sometime. The makeup effects are top notch.

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773
new thread >>34419773

File: 1497736321861.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>34419774
I've heard that's good I'll look into that