This may be a stuppid question, but what firearm has the least

File: e65648ecf5c3b858b26cadf4ad666f09.jpg (242KB, 1032x1379px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1032x1379px

>>34392491
probably an "improv gun", something like this Danish resistance WWII Era SMG machine pistol

>>34392491
What's more important is the quality of the parts, not necessarily the number

>>34392491
Break action anything.

>>34392491
>once everyobe runs out of parts...


Not gonna happen friendo

>>34392491
Single Shot gun

File: Hiroo Onoda.jpg (21KB, 277x262px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 277x262px

>>34392630
This a thousand times. Japanese stragglers lived in the jungle for 30 years after WW2. When they were finally found, their weapons still worked, and some of them even still had some ammunition.

>>34392491
>Im asking cause I want to start prepping for SHTF scenerios
you're IQ is too low to prep.

>Once everyone runs out of parts a lot of firearms will be of no use
... steel, aluminum, brass, saws, drills and files.
Those are more valuable. The only real difference between a gun made in 1600 and a gun made in 2000 is that the parts are interchangeable.
interchangable parts can easily be made by hand, you just need a micrometer or calipers.

>>34392491
slamfire shotgun. literally two pipes, a screw and an end cap

>>34392631
>>34392700
these. trapdoor stuff too. single shot is probably your best bet.

>>34392491
>This may be a stuppid question, but what firearm has the least moving parts?
cannon/handgonne
matchlock

>>34392724
>you're IQ
can't even tell if this is joking ...

File: slambangimprovisedshotgun-6-660x438.jpg (58KB, 660x438px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 660x438px

>>34392491
>but what firearm has the least moving parts?

>>34392491
Thumb trigger single shot rifle.

>>34392491
A muzzle loading percussion cap rifle has literally one moving part, but do you really want to use one?

>>34394772
In an inna woods scenario, a percussion cap muzzleloading shotgun is the most versatile firearm you can have.

>>34392491
>Once everyone runs out of parts a lot of firearms will be of no use

what is a vertical mill, Alex. I'll take stupid SHTF scenarios for 400.

>>34392727
Shit it doesn't even need to be a screw, you can use a nail or a piece or wire.

>>34392491
You an immortal or something? The average decent firearm, hell a lot of cheap ones, will outlast several generations of humans. It's only range nuts who go through a thousand rounds every weekend that would maybe have anything to worry about but that isn't something you'll be doing in a survival situation.

Hell in a survival situation your gun will likely be shot less than ever (assuming you are any sort of firearms enthusiasts) as you should only be using ammo when you need it.

File: 1484981681803.jpg (60KB, 529x529px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 529x529px

>>34394861
This.

Everyone who thinks this shit are the people who think SHTF=magdumping +30,000 rounds into an endless horde of zombies and asks dumb shit questions with no context to provide.

Just get whatever the fuck you want and stop worrying about "muh shit het duh fahn". You probably don't even carry a handgun already and most likely do not have any medical training and will never seek it in the first place. Learn how to differentiate reality from fantasy, then ask such questions. And try not to read my post with an inflection.