So pictures of the gun glock submitted for the MHS trials have

No.

>current year
>no front cocking serrations
>no ambi mag release
>G19 barrel length in G17 frame

Absolutely disgusting.

So which part is modular?

>>34388468
Well everything, it's a glock.

>>34388388
>Doo Doo brown
They better make a OD version.

I would a regular black glock19 size without the safety. I don't care for front serations I think they look dumb as fuck, I only really want the no finger groves.

>>34388477
Good thing.
Change everything.

>>34388388
I wouldn't because of the safety, but it looks like a good option

>>34388458

front Serrations are gay, you faggot.

>>34388388
If I was going to be a faggot and buy a flock, I'll just go Gen 4 19

As far as the XM17 competitors, why wouldn't I go CZ 320 or P-10?

File: Glock 19M.jpg (69KB, 750x528px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 750x528px

>>34388486
like this

>>34388504
you misspelled useful.

>>34388458
>no ambi mag release
The only decent way to achieve this on a handgun is with paddles but you FUCK NIGGAS always complain about them.

>>34388486
build an 80% glock 19 like a man. No finger grooves.

>>34388388
i like the colour

>>34388388
>>34388395
>>34388416
Looks like shit

t. Die Hard Glockfag

>>34388388
no finger grooves.. fugging beautiful. fuck the safety.

>>34388580
press checks are for wanna-be-operators

>>34388388
wow a tan glock it must be a lot better than the black ones

>>34388388
>no 1913 rail
>still pig noses
>same shitty trigger that's outclassed by every other wonder-nine striker handgun
>no front serrations
>no change to tumor-like backstrap setup
>safety looks like it was tacked on last second
>still have to pull trigger to disassemble

Glock is a joke and hasn't innovated in 30 years. They'll be going the way of Colt if they don't change

>>34388388
I would love a glock with a manual safety

wow it looks like every other fucking glock they make

>>34388388
>lanyard loop
Kek.

>>34388458
>wants front serrations for tacticool press check and literally nothing else AND ruining lines of the gun's aesthetic

Go shove a front serrated gun up your ass, you seem to love the sensation

>>34388802
1911fag?

>>34388388
No fucking wonder it didn't get adopted.

Requirements were:
>threaded barrel
>end-user-configurable frame size
>ambi controls
>manual safety
>tritium night sights compatible with current issued suppressor
It meets only 1 of these.

And no, I would not buy it on the civilian market either, because it's a striker fired pistol with a flimsy, afterthought-tier manual safety bolted to it.

It's just a tan glock with a shitty looking safety.

>>34388388
>If this was released to the civilian market would you buy it?

hell yeah, but only for the ogm tan slide I could slap on my gen4 brown frame. I wonder what the color finish is and what's underneath. like is the slide still nitride treated and then the whole thing ceracoated?

>>34388725
>press checks are for wanna-be-operators
>>34388822
>>wants front serrations for tacticool press check
>press checks are apparently tacticool and oper8durr now
Literally nogunz fucking retards

>>34388854
Forgot the nerd loop.

>>34388872
You can easily press check with rear serrations, or do you have girly hand strength?

>>34388888
BTFO

>>34388872
>press checks are apparently tacticool and oper8durr now

nope. they have always been that. press checks are a bloatware invention by "gun instructors" to sell to idiots who have too much money and time and want to cosplay being an operator.

>>34388888
quint of truth.

>>34388872
when do you ever need a press check? unless you are sitting in a helicopter 3min before you raid a compound?

File: 5b6bed_6238018.jpg (236KB, 1148x1268px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1148x1268px

EXTRA SAFETY

>>34388875
Oh, right, I did.

Figured that was kind of a gimme tho.

>>34388388
Why the fuck did they even bother holding a trial? They could have done the exact same thing by purchasing pistols on the commercial market, checking which one they liked best and then approaching the manufacturer for changes

>>34388388
>Hey Dieter, you know that multi-million dollar contract the DOD is going to award? Yeah, let's put absolutely no effort into our submission.

>>34388900
It's older than dirt. The only thing being marketed is the phrase "press check". Anyone learning to use a gun by themselves does it naturally, it's not like instructors are teaching anything new

>>34388585
or just have the two buttons, I've never seen an ambi mag release that didn't work correctly.

Why do you need front serrations to check if there's a round chambered? Is pulling the slide back 1/8" using the rear serrations impossible?

>>34388983
I'm sorta in the know and an euro instructor for an euro AT police unit shot himself in the hand "teaching" it to his students. so there is that...

>>34388999
because you're supposed to do it with a taco grip from underneath the trigger guard to be stylish.

>>34388577
Non glockers btfo'd eternally

Is your handgun as simple as a Glock? Does it have 34 or less parts?

>>34388785
Lol, keep telling yourself you that try hard

>>34388458
>front cocking serrations
For literally what purpose except looking gay and shooting your fingers off?

>>34388388
>Glock with a manual safety
I can dig it

>>34388388
>Glock: Nothing Fancy Edition

>>34389048
the spanish cross bolt safety version would have been better

All these posts hating on press checking / front serrations are spot on and making me content.

Fugging wannabe operators. It bugs me especially when they JUST chamber a round then proceed to press check. What the fuck....

>>34389017
Dont forget! If you are in that fantasy shootout, and in middle of fight, you want to press check, you can easily put your ungloved finger/hand all over the slide closest to the hot barrel.

File: 1486006920382410022.png (460KB, 800x449px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 800x449px

>>34388388
>that safety

File: 1495224413054.gif (1MB, 285x285px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 285x285px

>manual safety
>.40

So they took what made the glock great and removed it... and then chambered it in the worst modern handgun cartridge

>>34389112
How do you KNOW there's a round in there, can you see it? HUH?

>>34388993
It gets in the way of your grip, at least the Glock style releases do.

>>34388388
>>34388395
>>34388416
I like where they're going, but I also agree with
>>34388458

An ambi mag release like the MARS wouldn't be too hard to add.

File: 1477435162216.gif (3MB, 281x295px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 281x295px

>manual safety

Why is the US military so fucking retarded /k/?

>>34389160
They tested a 9mm version as well

File: 1495243017672.jpg (494KB, 1200x1020px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 1200x1020px

>>34389183
does Sig even sell the XM17 to the civicucks?

>>34389178
How important is an ambi mag release anyway? You can reverse the Gen 4 Glock one, do you REALLY gotta have it be fully ambidextrous? What does that really achieve on a pistol?

>>34388900
>press-checks are "bloatware"
Mamma left you alone by the furnace when you were young, didn't she?

>>34388900
>nope. they have always been that. press checks are a bloatware invention by "gun instructors" to sell to idiots who have too much money and time and want to cosplay being an operator.

Posters like you remind me of that video of /k/fags who don't even know how to shoot pistols.

>>34389256
no, my mom is a no gunner cunt who I believe killed my dad. haven't spoke to her in 15 years. she actually may be dead. 0 fucks given.

>>34389244
Ambidextrous use maybe?

I also would rather use my middle finger than my thumb to drop a mag, HK did it perfectly. Flipping the current release to do that doesn't really work well.

>>34389183
Manual safety takes zero time to deactivate as evidence by top competition shooters using 2011s, and it also gives more carry options like pocket, or Mexican carry in an emergency where you might not have or desire to use a holster.

>>34389183
You wouldn't want your typical soldier handling a Glock.

>>34388802
Why?

>>34388910
When you pick up a gun you think is loaded and you want to double check.

>>34389304
Either you're 15 or you really did huff exhaust in your youth. Either way get help.

>>34388932
Because government agencies are a bunch of snowflakes.
>and the industry will cater to them because its a pretty big contract

>>34389226
some states require them to sell it with a safety. PDs can also order them with a frame or trigger mounted safety

>>34388388
Not enough RAILZZZZZZ

>>34389003
Lol, europeans cannot into firearms

>>34389244
>righthanded
>righthand takes shrapnel
>for some reason need my
>cant fiddle fuck my glock safety out and reconfigure it lefty with one hand
>get bum rushed by ahmed with a rusty schmitar
>put 17 round sof lol9mm into
>doesnt
>cant reload in time cuz one hand and not lefty
>die

>>34389410
>put 17 round sof lol9mm into
meanwhile in the real world 17rds of military FMJ will most certainly kill an african bull elephant...

>>34389316
Why not? the British adopted the standard glock a couple of years ago and nobody has shot themselves in the leg yet, not many cops have done it either, or at least when they did it had nothing to do with a lack of safety and everything to do with shitty training

>>34389410
This is by far the most specific use case I've ever heard for a firearm feature. As if hitting the mag release with the offhand is even that difficult compared to actually exchanging the mag and then pulling the slide back.

>>34389458
>>34389429
>What is sarcasm

>>34389389
>he said in a thread about european firearms

>>34389451

>the British adopted the standard glock a couple of years ago and nobody has shot themselves in the leg yet,
Source this

>not many cops have done it either, or at least when they did it had nothing to do with a lack of safety and everything to do with shitty training
I have counter examples which prove this to be wrong

>>34389332
Do you not have two hands?

File: 1473659761121.jpg (199KB, 962x640px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 962x640px

>>34389500
>Source this

>>34389256
>being this autistic over front serrations

>>34388388
Gross

File: tom.jpg (332KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1080x1080px

>>34388388
>Glock
>Manual safety

God, they are lost as Apple...

>>34389512

I'm still waiting.

>>34388888
it takes the same amount of strength to do a press check on the rear serrations, you mental midget

>>34389500
http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/23797.aspx

Googling "British army soldier shoots self glock 17" brings up no links about the army, the only one on the front page about British use is a cop shooting himself in the leg because he had his finger partially in the trigger guard

What sourced counter example do you have that shows that lack of a manual safety on a safe action pistol is a serious problem for properly trained users? seeing as you're being autistic about super basic shit

>>34389552

The goal in sourcing a claim isn't to fail to prove the negative, you retard.

>>34389588
>I'm a faggot who can't be bothered opening google to check something incredibly basic or have the common courtesy to respond in kind

>>34389042
He's right tho. Glock hasn't innovated shit for the last 30 yrs.

>>34389609
>it's not my job to educate you

>>34389183
>Why is the US military so fucking retarded /k/?
It's filled with americans

>>34389463
Something that doesn't typically work in text format without extreme hyperbole due to a lack of audible inflection and body language.

>>34389609

>make claim
>can't back it up
>blames others

Nice.

File: ye olden tymes Glocke.jpg (121KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x600px

>>34389610
>He's right tho. Glock hasn't innovated shit for the last 30 yrs.

there is nothing to innovate. all those innovations are stylish fad of the year addons that don't actually make the pistol better, quite to the contrary.

>>34389647
I made a claim and backed it up, how exactly am I blaming others?

>>34389650

What's it like being part of the new fudds?

Considered suicide yet?

>>34389656

Your delusion is noted.

File: sms2-on-Glock-multi-small.jpg (282KB, 1711x1140px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1711x1140px

>>34389657
>What's it like being part of the new fudds?
dunno. you tell me.

>>34388388
>>34388395
No wonder they lost. It's like someone read them the MHS specs over the phone while they were arguing with a coffee shop barista, and they only remembered the bullet points vaguely.

>>34389682

There's no way you can be this stupid.
But on the other hand, your post has no bait in it.
So maybe you are?

>>34388388
If they lost the safety, made it in black, and lost the lip at the base of the magwell, itd be perfect. I'd buy one regardless of already owning a g19.

>>34388725
>>34388911
>>34389151
>>34389160
>>34389530
The safety was a requirement because the US military is a bunch of retards

>>34389706
wouldn't it be a g19 then?

>19 slide/barrel on a 17 frame
>no finger grooves

I'm okay with this

It's a shame they didn't bother to add an actual backstrap system that changes the profile of the grip. If they were too lazy to do it for a major military contract, it's safe to say they'll never do it for the commercial market.

fuck I hope whoever takes over after Gaston dies has better sense and isn't afraid to take a couple risks to improve their guns

>>34389697
just because I don't think ambi slide catches and front serrations are useful, doesn't make me a fudd. I'd rather have a red dot on my gun. that's what's really important and what really makes you shoot better.

>>34388388

Looks better in black and grey than tan. No, I would not buy it because glocks are boring.

>>34388388
Why are all glocks so damn ugly? Is it on purpose? Or do they just not know?

Look at a Walther, next to an H&K, next to a Sig, next to a Beretta, next to a Steyr, next to an M&P, next to a Ruger, next to a Glock. Steyr and Ruger aren't so pretty either but HOLY FUCK do glocks look simply retarded.

Crap ergos too.

>>34388388
>.40
They didn't test it in 9x19?

>>34389706
God damn you kids are retarded. At least google the fucking MHS specs before smearing your shit all over the internet, will you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM17_Modular_Handgun_System_competition#Requirements

>>34389734
>19 slide/barrel on a 17 frame
please explain because i don't get it at all

>>34389735

Holy fuck do you have schizophrenia or something?

File: 1460237914110.jpg (16KB, 365x346px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 365x346px

>>34389656
>I made a claim and backed it up

>>34389751
They're ugly because they put 0% effort into aesthetics. They spend all their time designing a simple, inexpensive, efficient, and reliable pistol instead. Glocks may be plain looking and boring but they're still the standard everyone else is measured against and, for whatever reason, nobody has yet to make an equivalent gun as light as compact. All the competition is heavier, larger, and lower capacity for the same size. Glock's doing something right, it just isn't aesthetics.

>>34389778
You get pretty much nothing ballistically for going over 4" in a 9mm pistol. That's why all the new "full size" pistols like the VP9, APX, PPQ, etc. all have 4" barrels and full size frames. It keeps the gun lighter and shorter in exchange for a marginal decrease in sight radius.

>>34389797

I wish it was possible for you to see how delusional and autistic you seem to normal people.
But you're incapable of this due to mental deficiencies.

>>34389816
>not running a G17L barrel in a G26 gun

kek. step on the gas mate.

File: IMG_20170525_194154.jpg (63KB, 446x368px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 446x368px

>>34389753
In fact they did. We just have limited pictures available.
>>34389778
19 length barrel and slide but with the 17 length grip. Pic related.

>>34389821
Care to explain what was wrong with what I said? Or did you just come to shitpost about the absolute least important aspect of a military handgun and then call everyone who disagrees autistic.

>>34388388
Holy fucking shit they actually got glock to put a manual safety on it.

>>34388785
>no 1913 rail
Good. Every single handgun with a 1913 rail looks like shit. It completely kills aesthetics.
>still pig noses
Doesn't happen to every glock, is barely noticeable compared to fuck ugly 1913 rail, and is easily and permanently fixable.
>same shitty trigger that's outclassed by every other wonder-nine striker handgun
No other trigger except vp9 is better. (Ppq and p320 a shit)
>no front serrations
Good. Pointless, raise the cost, and look like shit.
>no change to tumor-like backstrap setup
Good. It's comfortable and there's Backstraps available for people like you who can't shoot.
>safety looks like it was tacked on last second
Obviously it's an afterthought. Safeties are pointless on striker guns and it's only there to meet an arbitrary requirement. Hopefully it's done away with if these are released.
>still have to pull trigger to disassemble
So?

>>34389879
that safety is ten+ years old. they had another type for the spanish trials which was a push trough cross bolt type safety.

>>34389873

See, and now you expect me to get into an argument with you, like we're equals.
But you don't have the brain structure to be able to evaluate any information I give you anyway.
You don't even really have thoughts. Not on the level that normal people do.

File: joke.png (200KB, 490x355px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 490x355px

>>34389497

>>34389901
No. That wasn't the joke.

>>34389893
Okay.

>>34388932
Probably because the manufacturing process for civy wasn't adequate for military. Glock probably has certain specifications down to .0000 something of an inch for fitting parts as well as free play and such on some of the machines that make them. The military could need to tighten down on some of the tolerances given that they will need so many of them and given the operational circumstances as far as use. Blaf blah

>>34389726
Without finger grooves, basically yeah.

File: 498679144009.jpg (7KB, 197x135px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 197x135px

>>34388388
>that little bit of frame that extends out in front of the magwell
FINALLY.

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (65KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1280x720px

>>34388388
thank god this piece of shit never made it

glock fanbois now can only grasp on straws "MUH MARSOC ADOPTED DIS"

>>34388592
I'd love to but I don't have the shop tools to drill out the other 20%. I don't even have a dremmel. I have a vice though...

>>34389710
>US military is a bunch of retards
If we're so retarded how come now one can challenge us and we rule the 7 oceans, all sea trade routes, all skies, and all space? Jelly faggot in denial that's what you are lil girl.

File: lolgif61.gif (291KB, 294x225px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 294x225px

>>34390037

>If we're so retarded how come now one can-
>now one

lol
What a terribly unfortunate time for you to fuck up

>>34388388
That would be a MA compliant Glock.

>>34390000
Why is that desirable, in your eyes? It seems to me that it just makes it slightly harder to remove a stuck mag like one might see in a double feed.

>>34389751
> Look at Walther
Only polymer striker gun walther makes that looks good is the gen 1 p99. Glock is better looking than the gen 2 and ppq/variants.
>next to an H&K
Vp9 is their only striker, and looks like shit next to a glock.
>next to a Sig
P320 is their only striker gun and it looks like shit except for the subcompact version.
>next to a Beretta
Berettas only striker gun is the apx, looks like shit
>next to a Steyr
Steyr m9 looks cool except for the massive dust cover. Gen 1 is best.
>next to an M&P
Looks like shit next to glock
>next to a Ruger
Looks like, you guessed it, shit

I'm not saying that glocks are the best looking handguns, far from it. But I do think they're the best looking polymer striker guns currently in production.

>>34390219
How can you state your opinion of what is "good looking" as a fact? Besides Glocks are just striker fired bricks. Gen 1 -4 gave barely changed and while some like you may sing that praise after decades it's basically a fudd entry level striker

>>34390219
literally all of those striker guns you mentioned look better than the glock you deluded queer

>>34390004
>MUH USSOCOM STANDARDIZED AROUND DIS

ftfy

>>34389865
17 grip length is easier to handle with gloves and of course gives you better flush mag capacity

I'd also guess it's better balanced, and MAYBE offers more positive extraction at the cost of slightly greater felt recoil.

>>34390307
I meant why bother with the overhang. The grip is already 17 length, but that toe in the post I replied to is a new thing.

>>34390320
Dunno. Seems to be the trend in pistol design these days. Only advantage I could see is to give your pinky just a little bit of extra grip area.

>>34390189
It looks better. The frame should really have cut-outs or bevels, like you see on the VP9 (and many other handguns) to let the user rip magazines out easier, but Glock decided not to put that on the gun because their magazines are too perfect in how they drop freely from the gun.

>>34390169
Not if they never send it in to get approved by the AG it isn't.

File: 1373086428982.gif (2MB, 260x152px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 260x152px

>>34389893

>>34390339
A pinky extension on a 17 length grip is idiotic unless we have an unusual number of polydactyl soldiers getting issued the things.

>>34390380
Probably so general-grade officers can teacup/golf club grip it better.

After all, they're the ones testing these things at Aberdeen, giving their profound insight on what makes a good fighting pistol for today's Warfighters :^)

>>34390358
Thing is, the typical Glock has the entire baseplate available to grab. This stupid little extension just obstructs things. I don't particularly care about the aesthetics of a military side arm.
>>34390428
Maybe.

>>34390294
>How can you state your opinion of what is "good looking" as a fact?
Did you not read the post I was replying to?
>Besides Glocks are just striker fired bricks.
And yet theyre lighter and thinner than all their competitors.
Gen 1 -4 gave barely changed and while some like you may sing that praise after decades it's basically a fudd entry level striker.
>Every special forces group in the world is entry level

Not to mention, the only ways that other brands have "changed" is to become more glocklike themselves. Look at the evolution of the p99 to the ppq. Look at the evolution of the cz po9/P07 to the p10c. The development of the usp to the p2000, to the p30, to the vp9. They all realize people just want glocks, but they want more "features". More than that though, they want to appeal to special snowflakes who want glocks, but don't want their handgun to say glock on it because then they're not special anymore.

>>34388388
Why cant anyone recreate true coyote brown? It curry poop brown for fucks sake. I laugh at people who buy new Tacomas in this.

File: UMX-GBB-VP9-2L.jpg (10KB, 204x118px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 204x118px

>>34390456
It doesn't do you any good to grab it if you can't get leverage on it.

>>34390482
I concur. Having used that feature, I can tell you that stock Glock mags are easy enough to rip free if needed. I prefer the 320's grip cuts or the vp9's relief divots, yes, and an extended mag is even better.
That is actually my biggest gripe with those ridiculous Check-Mate mags the DoD bought for the M9. They have tiny sheet metal floorplate and are a pain to remove.
>I carry Mec-Gar mags with my Beretta

>>34390367
Exactly, We have begged them for years to make one. I doubt they will submit it. Because they are faggots like that. They would recoup their R&D cost and make a nice profit from MA alone. But they don't give a shit about us.

>>34388727
Racist

>>34390037
look dude I get it, you're American and you're proud and that's all well and good but you have to face reality, but here's the truth from someone who's actually seen The Green Weenie at work: The marine corps and probably the other services is 100% without a doubt stock full of knuckle dragging drooling retards from top to bottom. ask any vet and they'll tell you the same. no one joins the service unless they're desperate, looking for college money, or deluded. I was deluded, then I saw people doing things so unspeakably stupid it scared me, things anyone with the barest hint of common sense would know better than to do.

Off topic
Do they plan on releasing civilian versions of the glock 19m any time soon?

File: sherriff Trump.jpg (55KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1024x680px

>>34390051
What is auto-correct you retard. Picking at my grammar mistake proves you got nothing on the cold hard fact I dropped on yo ass.

>>34390459
Colors can be reserved by patent. Wouldn't be surprised if Dow Chemical or some other massive company owns that particular shade of tan and the 100 shades surrounding it on the visible spectrum

File: Ian_worried.jpg (74KB, 377x323px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 377x323px

>>34388388
>19 round magazine
>19 barrel
>26 curved front
>tan
>external safty
can't wait for Ian to make a video about it

>>34391131
That's pretty fucking stupid if that's real. They can probably patent a certain recipe for a certain shade maybe I just don't see how they could actually say "nahuh you can't use that color we own it".

>>34391198
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

>>34389166
Schrodingers Round

>>34389880
Autism, the post

>>34389256

Yes, press-checks are a meme.

>Are you demonstrating the firearm to someone?

>Are you about to clean the firearm?

If the answer is no it should be loaded. If you need to preform a press-check you're unloading the gun too much.

>>34388388
They actually submitted a pair, a full size and a compact, when the winner actually submitted a modular model as requested.

>>34389543
I don't understand what this post means in context. Did you reply to the wrong person?

>>34389656
>I made a claim and backed it up
Wut
How

>>34388592
Those look like shit and cost more than a file or a dremel

File: WallofText_zpse04f6526.jpg (53KB, 375x523px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 375x523px

>>34391080

>>34389410
>use left hand
>use index finger to drop mag
>use literally any joint/gear to retain gun
>insert mag
>use literally any surface/joint/edge/gear to to disengage slide or slide release

Sure was hard. You would probably call me a sorcerer if you say me do a one handed reload using my thumb on the back strap and my fingers on the slide

>>34389852
>not grip chopping a 9x25 G40 to G29 spec
>using KRISS extensions

Are you at least a power bottom?

File: glock-1024x679.jpg (133KB, 1024x679px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1024x679px

>>34389879
Yeah and?

File: muh aesthetic.jpg (35KB, 502x319px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 502x319px

>>34388458
>>34388888
who needs slide serrations?
also
>>34388577
checked

>>34389031
No but I still have all 10 fingers after shooting my pistol

>>34390037
Because othe companies spend a shitload of money building aircraft, ships, munitions, and infrastructure that allow for certain degrees of superiority over sand people, due in part to logistics and the US economy. Throw $80k-$100k at any other grunt in the world and see how it works out. You may end up with a damp fine slav conscript, but it isn't shit without the whole train of technology backing him up

File: 1495843847050.png (1MB, 874x874px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 874x874px

>>34388388
>Safety
>No threaded barrel
No sir I would not.

>>34390219
>glocks only striker gun is the glock
>which is mechanically identical mechanically to ever glock

>>34389451
a lot of countries carry without a round in the chamber.

US policy has long been "round in chamber, safety on".

Just different SOPs.

File: IMG_0535.gif (1MB, 290x189px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 290x189px

>>34388388
Is that a fucking manual safety? Holy dog balls glock perfection BTFO!

>>34389650
A rail is a very real improvement, as are replaceable and adjustible sights

so the same unimproved gun since the 1982....nice


glocknade a shit.

>>34392429
Jesus Christ do I hate long nails. It's 1 or 2 things I really don't like about my girl but everything else is great and I get away with plenty of shit so I can't actually complain. It's like lip plates and penis gourds for women

>>34389169
Go shoot and FNX / FNS, they full ambi and mag release is the berries.

>>34388388
Looks like a glock with a safety and a lanyard ring. I couldn't be more bored.

>>34388388
Oooh lookie, a Glock 19 with a manual safety!

>>34389880
>Good. Every single handgun with a 1913 rail looks like shit. It completely kills aesthetics.

Eat a dick, elmer. Functional and modular is sexy.

>>34389816
How true is this becuase I wanna cc a glock 34 since my clothes let me?? I always wondered why all the new fullsize 9s were only 4inch barrels.

File: blue hair catgirl.png (136KB, 427x482px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 427x482px

>>34389169
>It gets in the way of your grip
Is this what poorfags actually believe?

Whatever, I would love a 19MHS.

Full size frame + compact slide is always best combo

>>34388388
>.40S&W
>>34388416
>9x19

So which one was it that they submitted? Because the .40 would most certainly have fucked them over during the process.

>>34390358
you lost me at "looks better"

Some firearms are for show/safe queens. Some are, at their core, tools. Glocks are the latter.

Looks like glock doesn't even know how to read, what they submitted doesn't even fit the specified requirements.
what a POS.

>>34392752
That's the thing though, 1913 provides no additional functionality or "modularity" compared to the glock rail. Every light, laser, etc. worth owning is designed with glocks in mind first and foremost. You just have a cheese grater on the front of your gun for no reason.

>>34388854
>It meets only one of these

Glock has all of those things though, they just aren't pictured.

>modularity
just replace the frame, slide, and barrel, and BAM, new gun in whatever caliber/size you choose, just like the p320 but more options.

>>34388388
>finger groves gone
>actual fucking safety
All the reasons I hated glocks are now gone.

>>34389657
>>34389697
you are misusing the word fudd.

File: oh snap.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>34388477
>>34388492
heh....#rekt

>>34394478
I dislike the finger grooves but would HATE a safety, so it's one step forward and one step back for me.

>>34389166
>How do you KNOW there's a round in there, can you see it? HUH?

I'll take loaded-chamber indicators for $500, Alex!

File: 1459618905830.jpg (126KB, 439x526px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 439x526px

Just a friendly reminder glock failed the mud test

>>34394609

You're right, they do cost $500. They also add weight. Front serrations remove weight and let you do the same thing.

>>34394841
Yeah, if you're not carrying around a P08, you're gambling with your life.

>>34394846
You are now aware that the extractor is Glocks LCI.
>Juat like most guns with external extractors

>>34388388
I hope you're trolling. I am in awe of the fucking stupidity.Why the actual fuck would they ever want to complicate things further by ADDING A FUCKING SAFETY!!!!!!!!!?

>>34395021
Because apparently if you don't then every US service member would shoot themselves overnight.

>>34388388

No wonder they lost, that color is ugly as fuck. The darker coyote color is tolerable on some guns but glock needs to be black

>>34389880
>he thinks the 320's trigger is shit
Lol, you've never even held one have you?

>>34389957
>Probably because the manufacturing process for civy wasn't adequate for military.
>The military could need to tighten down on some of the tolerances given that they will need so many of them and given the operational circumstances as far as use.
>military
>precision close tolerance equipment
are you high or just fucking retarded?

>>34390000
>>34390189
i wish the 26 had this, i have to shoot with my pinky out because if i try to wrap it around down there it gets pinched between the mag and the frame when shooting and gives me blood blisters

>>34389226
Yeah, it's called p320.

WOW it's a Glock.

>>34389300
link to video?

>>34388785

Glock is a joke and they haven't innovated in 35 years and they just won an FBI competition that was tailor-made for the Sig P320.

>>34395550
The civilian version doesn't have the safety retard.

>>34395624
But it's the same him, retard.

>>34388458
Is your pinch grip that weak?

>>34389880
TP9SF trigger blows Gen4 G19 out of the water. I own both.

>>34388388
>program requirement was for a modular handgun
>literally called the modular handgun system
>glock submits a non-modular handgun

christ alive, why

>>34394197
they did both calibers, the test allowed .40 and .357 SIG iirc. the army is low-key thinking about transitioning someday. JHP rounds as a possible stopgap.

>>34395674
Hey you can change the backstraps and switch around the mag release. Totally modular.

>>34395674
Glock perfection blinded them with pride.

What's absolutely bonkers is that they have always been salty about US military contracts going to Beretta and Sig, yet they put mediocre effort into this. meanwhile Sig went balls-deep and offered literally what the Army told everyone it was looking for, at $207/gun.

That's a hard deal to pass on. Glock shot themselves in the leg here.

>>34388872
Press checks are the easiest way to know someone has no real firearms experience.

You should fucking know your gun is loaded you dumb teenager

>>34395629
>it's the same him

What did he mean by this?

>>34391673
It doesn't matter if you handle the weapon like it's loaded if it goes click when it needs to go bang, retard.

File: 1496793907165.gif (4MB, 425x425px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 425x425px

>>34389893
>getting rekt this hard
The only thing worse than Glock fanboys is their haters.

>>34394325
>Every light, laser, etc. worth owning is designed with glocks in mind first and foremost.
haha no

Should just stock up on High-Points and be done with it.

>>34396661
>wanting the military to become nothing but niggers

>>34389451
If you have to ask why you must not have been in the military.

>>34388785
Glock made a small number of pistols with pic rails, but apparently they tended to get stuck in holsters so were quickly discontinued

>>34392495

>Completely redesigned FCG from the 42/43, yet still retains legacy magazines.
>Not been improved

>>34395624

Yes it is fucktard

File: 2017-06-22 00.19.08.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34396906
No, it doesn't.

Here's the picture of the one I own, I think I would know.

>>34395400
I dunno, I think a dark leather brown/coyote wouldn't look bad on a Glock.

>>34396689
>thinks the military isn't nothing but niggers
Doh-hoh-hoooh

>>34396900
I don't know much about the 42/43, what'd they do there?

>>34395797
Kek, saw their chance blow up right in front of them

>>34388388

Fossilized dog shit brown