Does anyone else want to see a rifle with a simplified version

>>34334295

>Kraut Spess Magic

IIRC Shit's so complicated that supposedly, the initial doctrine wanted the whole action/assembly to be swapped in field with a new one.

>>34334318
This is correct. They were hermetically sealed to prevent anything from getting in, and they were 'not supposed' to fail. If it did, you'd go to the armory, and they'd just hand you a box with a new one you just slap right in.

>>34334341
>>34334318
I mean honestly that doesn't really seem like all THAT bad of a system, i mean yeah sure you can't fix a malfunction during a firefight but with a system that well sealed i doubt it would have malfunctioned very often.

>>34334387

That means when you purchase the G11 you have to procure more assembly/action parts than rifle count.

File: G41_2014-02-01_18-02.jpg (33KB, 640x388px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x388px

Here's something better.

>>34334576
>bulky
>unaesthetic
>heavy

How about no.

>>34334471
Well i mean isn't that the case with every rifle? you've gotta have some replacement parts.

>>34334471
Bits on guns break.

You replace those bits with new bits. That are not in existing rifles.

Any large order of weapons will require a certain number of spares anyway. No one 'just' orders 5,000 AR15s for example. There would be a whole logistics and maintainance package too.

>>34334610
Think you got that mixed up with that shit block you actually consider a "viable rifle".

>>34334664
I mean cmon wasn't one of the main selling points of roller delayed blowback that it makes for a light gun? How does the G41 manage to weigh 9 goddamn pounds then?