>anon posts a large c'ollection' of his pistols

The sights comment is retarded, not all pistols are glocks. Last i checked you don't need a holster for a range gun and frankly just shooting a firearms won't really lead to very much finish wear. Of course that depends on the gun your firing.

Shit thread OP, shit thread

Only one I've yet to fire out of the seven I own. That's the CZ P-07 I picked up about 2 weeks ago. Just about all of my other pistols are pretty well worn and run like butter because I've had all of them for years. Been too busy to go fire the new CZ as of late. But I'm intending to do that this week since I've just been put on call at my night job. Built up a pretty good stash of 9x19 in the time I've not been firing the new CZ or my 92FS

>>34309288
Which do you prefer cz75 or beretta? I personally find the ergonomics, trigger, m9 two dot sights and the overall aesthetic of the beretta better, but that's just me

Sure I do, I just can't afford accessories for any of them, and live in the DPRC, so they go from my safe, to the range, then back to my safe.

>>34309272
>The sights comment is retarded, not all pistols are glocks.

Case and point: retard thinks white three dots are any good then tries to call others retarded.

>>34309243
>>they still have the stock sights on them or the fancy smancy """"upraded"""" night sights
There's no fucking winning with you, is there?

>>34309528
>Case and point
The expression is *case in point, you illiterate mongoloid.

>>34309536
>Using sights at all

>>34309243
If you think people carry every pistol that they own, then you know nothing about guns, and need to sit down, shut up, and lurk more.

>>34309528
What the fuck are you even on about, you noguns idiot? There is nothing wrong with three dot sights. I still can't figure out what you are saying.

>>34309557
Just stop. You don't know what you're doing. What you perceive to be "le epic troll" just comes off as a cringey, underage vidyatard who got in over his head.

>>34309243
who is that i want to breed her

File: 1484637703417.jpg (92KB, 613x1024px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 613x1024px

>>34309536
>There's no fucking winning with you, is there?

You are probably think that I am talking about things like photoluminescent night sights such as Trijicon HD's or the number of ones Ameriglo makes.

I am speaking about pic, Trijicon Bright & Toughs, the multitude of night sights that come stock on HK, Sig and CZ handguns that are marketed as a "plug" when all you're paying for is the same shitty white 3 dots but with tritium vials.
>>34309549
>The expression is *case in point, you illiterate mongoloid.

You can't construct a logical counterpoint to the topic at hand, suck my dick.
>>34309568
>What the fuck are you even on about, you noguns idiot? There is nothing wrong with three dot sights. I still can't figure out what you are saying.

Which is why you're a fucking retard and need to sit down as adults are conversating about a topic that is obviously something out of your knowledge of. Stay in your lane faggot. You don't need to post in order to participate in a thread.

Remember that scene in The Big Lebowski where Donny tries to butt into a conversation to which Walter replies "Shut the fuck up, Donny"? You should be more like Donny. Shut the fuck up.

>>34309589
>"plug"

*plus

>>34309243
Lmao sorry you cant afford to have a nice collection besides your carry gun/guns.

>>34309589
>photoluminescent night sights such as Trijicon HD's or the number of ones Ameriglo makes.
Like I said, you're in over your head. You don't even know what that word means or what those brands of sights use to illuminate the dots. Go back to /v/ or whatever shithole spawned you before this gets ugly for you.

>>34309607
>You don't even know what that word means

Specify "that word"

>thinking guns have to have wear on them to show off that they've been used
Do you happen to be a instructor at Tactical Response?

File: 2 piece 12ga and Slav .45.jpg (1MB, 2954x2083px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2954x2083px

>gun came with trijicon suppressor height night sights
Your move, OP

>>34309613
Lol. You'll figure it out eventually.

>>34309644
Please, tell me. And if you think I'm the guy who suggested not using sights at all, you are wrong.

>>34309647
Do your homework before posting a shitty troll thread next time, idiot.

File: 1490374186593.jpg (27KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x600px

>>34309656
>Do your homework before posting a shitty troll thread next time, idiot.

I'll keep making them. Just because my delivery hurt your feelings doesn't invalidate any of my facts. You still haven't specified that word that I don't know "what it means".

Was it "photoluminescent"? Why are you so apprehensive of simply telling me the word? Are you scared you're going to get your ass handed with facts again?
>he's going to resort to another ad hominem
>again!

>>34309549
It's a doggie dog world out there

File: 1492475540155.png (265KB, 497x370px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 497x370px

Not OP but-

Easiest board to troll

>>34310656
Yup. Remember, gents. 'sage' goes in the options field.

>>34309243
>they still have the stock sights on them or the fancy smancy """"upraded"""" night sights

Wait, so you have a problem with people who have both stock sights and people who have upgraded their sights?

Would you just prefer them to have no sights?

File: P30L LEM 5 18 17 1.jpg (564KB, 929x747px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 929x747px

>>34309243
I'm going dawson fiber optic with blocked out rears when I can be assed to do it.

>>34309589
Stock sights are fine if you are actually good at shooting.

>>34311852
>>34310787
>>34310880
Stop bumping the thread.