Name literally one weapon superior to this rifle.
>protip: you can't.
Gewehr 98
>>34189145
Ar-15
>>34189159
trash tier
>>34189163
get real faggot KYS
HI cunts
SLR
literally anything from Europe
M39 EMR
Arisaka 98 No i/m not a weaboo
Lee Enfield
>>34189185
lol what are you doing with your life
>>34189189
See above response, like seriously.
>>34189202
lol
Long bow
Everything that came after it.
>>34189230
/Thread
>>34189145
SVT-40
>>34189145
One weapon?
>>34189220
Close but m1 is basically just the lee enfield upgraded using a superior caliber
>>34189216
>No im not a weaboo
lol just fucking leave
400 pound war crossbow, pierce straight through armour
Martini Henry
Colt Revolving Rifles
Fat man
>>34189261
>not using the fallout 3 mirv
>fallout 4 ever
kys.
>>34189247
>implying you cant but .308 ap ammo
lol
if youre talking about mobile armor such as tanks or APC's then why the fuck are you trying to use small arms anyways. thats literally all the chairforce is useful for anyways destruction of enemy armored elements, might aswell put those overly expensive jets to use.
Trebuchet
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
A pointy stick
Literally a fucking stick could beat that inaccurate piece of shit
>>34189253
>battlefield 1 fag detected
get arma faggot
>>34189259
>only 6 shots possible 9 depending on variant
lol ill still be on my same mag while youre (if youre smart) changing cylinders.
>>34189145
literally nothing. they don't call it the greatest battle implement ever devised for nothing.
>>34189279
>inaccurate piece of shit
lol aim better faggot. gitgud
Gewehr 43
>>34189294
>literally nothing
this man deserves a fucking trophy, he gets it.
>slowclap.gif
>>34189288
>>34189145
BM-59, when the Spaghetti can make better improvements on the rifle.
Or to be real, any fucking modern auto-loading rifle that doesn't weigh over 11 pounds and can carry more than 8 rounds of 7.62 REAL FN NATO. That being said, MAS-56.
>>34189299
>litteraly lost to the M1 Carbine
>M1 tries and fails to be garand
>says gewehr is superior
>couldnt even beat M1 Carbine
get real. you may aswell be one of these faggots suggesting sharpened sticks like some nigger.
>>34189341
answer me faggot
>>34189310
>>34189238
>>34189340
>any modern auto-loading rifle that doesn't weigh over 11 pounds
>weigh more than 11 pounds
>11 pounds
do you even lift bro? every day is arm day with M1 garand.
BM-59
>>34189349
alright
>davey crocket
>only one shot before reloading
>cant fucking aim so chooses AOE isntead of precision
>has to reload each round by hand
"HERP DERP BUT MUH AOE"
>cant do shit when enemy over runs position
>tactical doggo
>still better than cat
>no arguments
that dog is missing his fucking MTV to carry my extra clips but still no arguments.
>>34189238
Someone somewhere thought this was a great idea.
Some faggot somewhere said it wasn't and cancelled it.
>>34189388
I bet you don't even fuck deer do you faggot
>>34189145
M-14
>>34189170
The garand is a jam fest waiting to happen. Go ahead, get some mud on the closed action and see if it runs after the first round goes off.
Ross rifle
>>34189442
Men a hell of a lot better than you used the Garand to great effect shooting people in arctic, desert, jungle, forest, etc conditions. Its fine.
>>34189145
This maybe?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RfcZHca8gw
>>34189405
>deer
>doggos
>traps
anything i can fit my dick in really
>>34189412
lol nopeengineer.jpg
>>34189491
another gentleman of culture and history i see
>>34189145
1903 Springfield
a glock 18 full auto.
Power armor
>>34189511
>too bulky
>cant be viable in CQC
"but garand barrel length"
>affixable bayonet
>still viable in cqc to bash your enemies face
>get upper hand in combat
>draw glorious M1911
>shoot down cqc foe
>garand still superior
pic related MFW
a seal club.
>>34189531
>not the nanosuit 2.0
Not even trying
>>34189527
nope still useless in cqc
>>34189530
>9mm
lmao
>>34189531
>power armor
>armor
>"one weapon"
>weapon
>armor
just stop
>>34189145
While you were busy shitposting, I studied the blade.
And now that mud is in your action and your gun won't cycle you have the audacity to ask me to name a better weapon?
>>34189640
>>34189491
^ once again dont slather your gun in fucking mud like savage fucking slav and youre fine. the garand worked fine in the pacific theater
>>34189412
I second this
>>34189664
no one cares
its crap and the caliber is tiny
>>34189145
The AR-10 in any of it's original configurations
>>34189145
>Name literally one weapon superior to this rifle.
Damn near every weapon designed after it.
Wow, that was hard.
>>34189672
>too afraid to name any
>cant check the thread to see bunch of dumbasses already posted some generic bullshit
believe it or not there is one correct answer to this question
>>34189670
>ar-10
>try hard m16
>m16 still trash
atleast you chose a weapon using .308 for the most part
>>34189170
>>34189732
look out guys we got a badass over here
stfu and go back to stroking your cock to your shitty trash tier slavic weaponry
Streetsweeper, obviously
>>34189159
who won the war?
C7a1 chambered in 6.5 Creedmore
>>34189145
SKS
>>34189775
holy shit what is that a pic for amoeba?
>>34189145
Mauser, oh let's say m96?
>>34189145
Krag
>>34189813
bully to you too, old chap.
>>34189849
Right oh! These Spaniards are quite the menace!
>>34189716
>too afraid to name any
Lets see, any hk clones, any fal, any ak & clones, vz58, sks, ar15 & clones, and pretty much any 1950's or newer magfed gun I forgot to mention.
Autism
>>34189145
BM59
>>34189442
>>34189640
where the fuck did this "get mud on it and it jams" meme come from? The garand is battle proven to work in alot of shitty conditions. It isn't an AR
>>34191453
Mud tests.
AR's function far better in the mud, despite the memes.
>>34189767
Communists and Jews.
>>34189775
>>34189412
The M14 is a product improved M1.
-Uses .308, allowing for shorter action while retaining roughly identical ballistics. Ammunition is far cheaper and more available.
-Detachable box magazine holds more than twice the ammunition. No aesthetic ping but you're reloading half as often and not pinching your fingers or banging on the op rod.
-Due to box magazine can mount optics. Not very well by modern standards, but better than the full retard M1-D setup.
-Short stroke gas piston system improves versatility with different loadings, eliminating bent op rods and decreasing vibration.
-Point of balance further back, allowing for better offhand shooting.
-Shoulder thing that goes up.
-Flash hider or muzzle brake.
-Can also be built with a shorter barrel without causing problems.
-Originally had F/A capability. Not super useful but better to have and not need.
All the deficiencies it had were present and worse on the M1. Of course times change. M1 was ahead of it's time. M14 was quickly eclipsed by the XM16. But it's still a damn good rifle and definitely an improvement on the M1. Cooler? That's subjective. M1s have serious credentials because muh WW2, but the Vietnam aesthetic is real fucking NATO as well.
>>34191481
>muh mud tests!
I have yet to see a mud test video where they put the AR in mud with the bolt open or otherwise get mud inside the action. Even then- ARs will only function with
>the right mags
>the right ammo
>a correctly tuned gas system
>if its from a good factory
>if its a good parts kit assembled just so
otherwise its prone to failures
>>34189388
The fuck is AOE
>>34191680
DESU you see the same thing with any gun. I've seen some really screwed up AK builds, plus the el-cheap-o cast trunnion hand grenades. Also god help the poor fool that tries to kitbash an M14gery. They're almost like revolvers, one little thing not set just right and you'll get any number of weird malfunctions. It takes a lot of fitting and troubleshooting to do it right. Cheap magazines make em eat shit too.
These seem to be universal problems.
>>34189238
Why didn't they just mount the system on a fast vehicle, like a jeep?
The whole problem with it was that the blast radius and fallout was dangerous to its stationary operators. Why not just fire it while mobile and drive in the opposite direction as quickly as possible?
>>34189170
Well he ain't wrong.
>20/30 rounds vs 8 rounds
>shit ton of parts for cheap prices vs lol that'll be half a stack plz
>modern and constantly updated tech vs industrial era technology
>large range of ammo choices ranging from the tiny .22 to the comfy .300 Winchester Magnum
>easily modified vs how dare you
Not to jizz on anyone's parade floats but this is either obvious bait or mecha-autism judging by just how many top gun hat reaction pics he has
Stg44 is superior to be honest.
>>34192238
this is gonna be good
>>34191693
You have google.
Garand in .458 winmag.
>>34191501
Easy enough.
>>34189145
>>34192249
But it is.
>>34192333
That is far more sexy then it has any right to be.
Oh and this one too.
>>34192376
A E S T H E T I C
>>34189145
>>34191778
Why do so many fucking people put the buckle facing inwards so it digs into your shoulder?
worse rifle of ww2 easily, watch the mud test.
>>34191857
But it was. They were all deployed either with an APC for the crew or a jeep.
I'd take my chances in the APC which might have at least rudimentary NBC protection
>>34192376
That is a sexy raifu what is it?
>>34192969
A mas 49
>>34191857
Because adding +50 mph won't do shit to protect you from a blast wave moving at 800 mph