>>34175814
The StuG is not a tank.
>>34175825
by that shitty definition of yours the mark 1 would neither be a tank you fucktard
>>34175840
Incorrect. An assault gun is an assault gun and a tank is a tank.
>>34175867
autism folks
>>34175879
Go back to whatever shithole site you came from.
>>34175814
Square tanks can pivot. Also the stug isn't a tank.
>>34175879
what is tank and what is spg is determined by country using it you nigger cum guzzling retard. Stug is spg because German said so same way. m18 is tank destroyer despite having turret,burgers Just decided to call it td
>>34176271
>m18 is tank destroyer despite having turret
Because it's doctrinally a tank destroyer and not effective in any other role thanks to its paper armour. It's a really fucking fast gun, designed to kill tanks, so it's a tank destroyer.
>>34176271
>what is tank and what is spg is determined by country using it you nigger cum guzzling retard.
This is a very persuasive argument which also happens to be completely wrong.
>>34175879
They're both armor. Just keep calling it a tank to mess with the spergs though
>>34176645
Yes, non-Germanen will never understand. You don't need to either.
>>34176539
M10 in US service was a tank destroyer. M10 in British service was self propelled artillery. Because they said it was.
>>34175825
Yes it is, armored, even lightly armored self-propelled gun carriages that are designed to fight with the crew mostly inside are tanks.
>>34175814
Probably because sloped armour didn't exist as everyone was trying to design tanks. Have you looked at other countries before the Russian tanks? Everything has to start somewhere, in 1939 they didn't have the knowledge of 2017 anon.
>>34176539
Look at >>34176751
you loved-to-be-cucked retard. Literally the only thing that detrmines what is tank and what is td is army using it.
>>34175814
Your answer can be found here.
https://youtu.be/LB5YkmjalDg
I want a VW thing to convert into a kubelwagon so bad.
>>34177522
Sloped armor had been around for a while when they designed the tiger, and every tank in OPs pic has sloped armor implemented in a few spots.
it's hip to be square
https://youtu.be/x6tTLjjIGp0
>>34175814
What's wrong with square?
The best cars are also square
>>34178320
>check the youtube comments
>it's full of bateposting
everythings as god intended
>>34175814
Curved forms are a Jewish leftist lie.
The spirit of Fascism lives in the purity of the right angle and the straight line.
>>34182515
>>34182515
So I guess this French ww2 design is degenerate.
>>34175814
>Slavic
>Watch German Blitzkrieg time and time again
>Still not see the use for a radio.
>>34175867
So what's the difference? Is it primarily that the tank has a turret instead of a fixed gun?
>>34185490
Don't remind me of this tank...
>>34185581
quack