> hi point doesn't make good firea-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2o5cq7nuAE&list=UUr_euVWzAlgHJMeXg-33ovw&index=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_U_utYxY0o&index=3&list=UUr_euVWzAlgHJMeXg-33ovw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYUpcCacTNA&index=1&list=UUr_euVWzAlgHJMeXg-33ovw
>>34160983
They need to redesign their shit to accept doublestack magazines.
It goes bang.
Jamal goes to the morgue.
What more do you want from a 200 gun?
I'll call it good when those niggers figure out double stack magazines, but before that, it's shit.
>>34161013
this. I'd totally grab a carbine but the capacity is laughable, and changes my mind.
I thought it's kinda agreed upon that, for what they cost at least, hi-points aren't that bad. I've considered buying a hi-point carbine because I can't buy a handgun. that or maybe a 10/22 or an AR-7
I mean honestly just make a version that accepts glock magazines (or any other widely available double stack magazine) while still maintaining the $200 and i might actually buy it.
>>34161013
the guns were designed by a guy whose daughter got raped. his goal was to make a gun that was cheap as fuck and invulnerable to gun control laws. pretty ironic that the guns became popular with the same gangbangers who attacked his daughter
>>34161105
A ten round doublestack would be fine for the C9.
>>34160983
lol an ar15 would be destroyed after that gravel test
>>34161105
got a source for that
>>34161013
how are they supposed to make money without selling proprietary magazines? pretty sure thats where most of their margin comes from.
>>34161105
Adapting it to double stack would not increase the price at all.
>>34161198
well they should make proprietary doublestacks then with a 12 and 25 round capacity.
and a drum built sorta like the x-products one (there's an m1911 drum that works in a similar way) just to make people happy
>>34161105
Is this a meme now? I saw someone say the same thing about keltec a little bit ago
>>34161386
Are you a nigger
>>34161393
Go to the handgun tier list thread and see for yourself
>>34161105
This is bullshit.