I'm looking for a 1000 yard bolt action rifle chambered

>>34116766
>under 1k
might as well look in the >>>/trash/ for gold.

>>34116766
Savage axis 2, buy a high quality scope (burris, vortex ect.)

>>34116775
I've seen youtube videos of a guy ringing steel at 1000 yards with a Savage Axis. I think that there are absolutely rifles capable of that range for less than $1000. Just looking for options because it will end up being an expensive build when it's all said and done.

>>34116781
I'm really giving thought to a Savage, mainly because of the trigger. The accu-trigger on my buddy's .17HMR is godly.

File: 1394331101966.jpg (1MB, 2250x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2250x1500px

bumping

>>34116821
Just swap out the stock, the axiseses stocks have a lot of bend in them, the kind that makes the stock touch the barrel if you have a bipod and put any weight whatsoever on the rifle.

>>34116821
Also what's your budget on an optic? There's a Steiner one the Canadian sniper YouTube man reviewed that was a good buy.

>>34116999
There's an article on them in the latest American Rifleman that I haven't read yet. I'll have to check it out. And as far as my budget I'd like to have both rifle and optic for less than 2k.

>>34116766
You didn't google this, did you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hVDu1EARBc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGroqvya_is

>>34117027
Just found this trying to find the name of the guy, he knows his stuff. I'd advise just getting a better optic with that setup if you want something better.
http://youtu.be/iK_xQ1X9sCg

>>34116821
muh trigger.
just get a stevens, and spend the extra on a nice scope.

>>34117239
>Just get a stevens
Stevens was bought by Savage years ago you stupid twat. Why would I not buy the rifle with a companies best trigger, which also happens to be a trigger that like?

>>34117034
No I didn't, thanks for the videos though. They definitely put me on the right track.

File: Capture.png (190KB, 1616x856px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1616x856px

>>34116766
get a remington 700 sps tactcial aac-sd, or a savage fcp-sr. i'd go for the remington tho because of aftermarket support and savage is shit

>>34117293
>Stevens was bought by Savage years ago
derp

>>34117441
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevens_Arms

You're a fucking dumbass. If you're not going to contribute to the thread, go somewhere else. I'm sure there's a nice mech/battleship/shitty /pol/ thread just waiting for you in the catalog.

File: IMG_2734.jpg (20KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 443x332px

>>34117402
>buys a Remington in this day and age
>calls Savage shit

>>34117293
>stupid twat.
>>34117477
>fucking dumbass.
i was trying until assalted by you.
maybe take your own advice(If you're not going to contribute to the thread, go somewhere else).

>>34117402
I'm not a fan of Remington, especially their newer stuff. I've always been partial to Savage or to Winchesters. Unfortunately Model 70s are wicked expensive so I'll probably go for the Savage.

>>34117500
the remington is shit too but it's easier to fix