Coming from /p/ I know Nikon has probably forgotten more knowledge

>>34100163
I have a Nikon p223 or whatever. It's as good of a scope you're going to find in that $125-$200 price range.

>>34100179
yea it is solid as fuck. the eye relief is kinda tight, but everything else feels like $500 glass.

I own a Simmons sportsman 4x32 and a Leopoldo vx2 3-9x40 feel free to ask any questions.

>>34100179
The fixed 3x one?

>>34100298
That's the one.

Nikons are great, optically speaking, but I'm not a fan of their AR-15 specific reticle. Also Vortex has dat no BS warranty.

>>34100163
My Nikon 4-12 is awesome for the price very clear glass

>>34100163
>Not getting a Vortex for the warranty alone.

>>34100163
>Coming from /p/
Then you should know you get what you pay for.
What is your intended purpose for the scope?

>>34100163
I buy/trade/sell every Prostaff I can get my hands on at pawnshops.

amazing bargains considering the quality of the coatings and general robustness as long as the seal hasn't been broken.

Are Nikons good in shitty conditions?
None of my Luepolds have ever failed me. Even in -40F.

>>34101929
Nikon had the exact same warranty faggot

>>34103716
>had

I have two Nikons - a P-Rimfire attached to my 10/22 and a Buckmasters II attached to my CVA Wolf. So far so good with both - they're way above the quality level I'd expect for the price.