Is the tactical version of the cz 75 sp 01 worth $180 more than

>>34091511

Do you feel that a decocker is worth 180 dollars? That is the only thing that separates the manual from the decocker version.

>>34091538
Seems neat but i could always spend that $180 on ammo

>>34091538
Also i like the sig p226s decocker, never tried this one though

decockers are for retards with twitchy fingers on the hammer

File: GUN-000858_2.jpg (19KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x400px

Sp 02 shadow worth $400 more? Doesn't seem like it

>>34091511
I'd rather carry cocked and locked personally.

Also, the Omega system lets you switch back and forth and is a more robust design. Why isn't everyone buying the Omega versions?

File: CZ.jpg (34KB, 800x515px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x515px

If you want a range toy, don't get a decocker. Decockers, no matter what the gun, will add to the trigger weight. So there's no point to have one if all you want is a range toy.

Avoid the CZ Omega. The design is not more robust and parts for a trigger job are not out there. Just get a normal 75 and upgrade with Cajun Gun works parts for a sweet CZ range toy.

Pic related

>>34091657
>"i can't decock a pistol so neither can anyone else" - the post

>>34093282
why bump this shit thread tho

>>34092087
I felt the older version of the shadow a while ago. It was pretty nice and I'd probably pay an extra 400 for it just so I don't have to buy parts to get mine feeling the same way. Single action trigger was great and double action was just as smooth as normal but much lighter. Plus the shadow 2 has those gucci aluminum grips and bigger beaver tail.

>>34091511
Dude, do a fucking Google search.

File: 1455283961250.gif (2MB, 200x182px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x182px

>>34091511
>looking to get a CZ-75 SP-01
>don't know if I want to just get the Tactical or the Shadow
>I prefer decocker because it's a double action pistol, no need for a safety
help