Add some little stamped steel inserts to strengthen the receiver

>>33970342
Looks fuckin hot

I love space gats

>>33970342
It's cheap though, Hi-point cheap. But without the ugly.

yea dogg, dis a brothas thread now. Ayo, who else gots a glock 40?

File: 1493828068601.jpg (18KB, 248x189px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 248x189px

>>33972412

You're objectively retarded.

$675 msrp and even after the cut down on the msrp (which any good lgs does) it's no where near highpoint prices

>>33970342

My biggest issue with it is that it doesn't seem like the bipod would be very usable in shooting.

Anyone have one that can comment on the bipod?

File: 1494791199085.gif (415KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 480x238px

>>33972976
Dunno where you buying your guns, but I can get one for $300 to $500.

>>33973254
it sucks. no locking mechanism, the tabs that lock it up in hand guard mode are a fucking pain to use, etc

shitty rifle

>>33970342
It looks like it was built in a Puerto Rican Pharmaceutical factory that was repurposed for guns.

I have one, it's ok.
Shoots fine, extremely lightweight and folds in half. The polymer receiver does not inspire confidence though.
For the specific purpose as a pack rifle, I think it's fine. But for any other use I'd say just stick with an AR

>>33973331

Site literally gives an msrp of 676 and gun broker doesn't show anything new for high point prices either, so go eat a dick

>>33973331

Msrp is 676

500 isn't close to highpoint prices

Not seeing any new ones to buy for around 300 online

>>33973618
>M S R P
>S
it doesn't mean that's what it's being sold for

>>33974106
>I can't read

>>33973461
>It looks like it was built in a Puerto Rican Pharmaceutical factory that was repurposed for guns
Well, you're not wrong there if such a thing were to happen.

>>33970342
at one time it was approachable but now basic ARs are to cheap. Still want one tho

>>33973508
this

I got a C model for cheap, and I like it enough to stave off buying a Mini-14. Forget about the bipod though, it's basically useless.

What is this? Never seen one.

File: 18382375_850895935063091_2908198690575351808_n.jpg (191KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1080x1080px

>>33970342
The SCR is superior in every way.

>>33975497
Literally another AR. Sorry bro but at least the kel-tec is interesting.
I live in a cuck state, but I would rather buy a featureless stock, or go fin grip.

>>33972412
I want a hightpoint side loading 556 delayed blowback rifle that can switch between left and right ejecting simply by rotating bolt head 180 degrees and using eject port as magwell. It would be a gun that would put the simplicity and reliability meme of the AK to shame

File: IMG_0381.jpg (114KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1600x900px

>>33975335
jUsT gEt An Ar15 bRo

>>33970342
I wish someone would get rid of the retarded stock and design it with a sheet metal reciever and the ability to feed straight into the mag from the stripper clips that American eagle packages their shit on.

Getting rid of that shitty bipod hand guard would be an improvement as well.